Open Stack

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlowja at yahoo-inc.com>wrote:

> They all are?
>
> https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/openstack/
>
> Seems like some partial support for japanese/chinese, but that¹s about it.
>
> Wouldn't a agreement be better to have, instead of grandfathering the past
> in (and the weight it entails). Just cause something was initially done
> one way doesn't mean its the right way or the best way to go forward.
>

+ 1


>
> On 11/29/12 12:06 PM, "Sean Dague" <sdague at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >On 11/29/2012 02:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I was just remembering a code review recently
> >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15394/) where it was brought up by me
> >> about how it'd be nice to finally get around to having some type of vote
> >> or official decision about using I8LN for LOG messages.
> >>
> >> Is there any type of agreed upon system for doing this (say restricting
> >> the allowed vote to openstack commiters?) Is it possible to re-use the
> >> election voting system for this purpose?
> >>
> >> Seems like this kind of vote could be used for other cross-purpose
> >> coding decisions as well where everyone should get an input.
> >>
> >> For further background on this whole discussion (so we can avoid
> >> repeating it yet again).
> >>
> >>  1.
> >>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openstack/dev/11821?search_string=i
> >>18n%20of%20log%20message;#11821
> >>  2.
> >>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openstack/dev/7764?search_string=i1
> >>8n%20of%20log%20message
> >>
> >> Seems like reviews like the above would not be 'abandoned' if we had
> >> some official consensus on the path forward.
> >
> >So, since then, I think a follow up review did go through with the same
> >effect - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/16414/
> >
> >At this point, log messages are basically all translated. There was
> >never an official decision either way as far as I can remember, but
> >their is now defacto precedence that they are.
> >
> >So we should either declare that to be the official stance (which would
> >be basically, accept the status quo), or someone should write a patch
> >that reverts them all to untranslated.
> >
> >Once a decision is made either way, we should probably put in a gating
> >job to enforce the behavior we want so that we don't end up with things
> >landing or getting kicked because of the day of the week they get
> >submitted. :-)
> >
> >       -Sean
> >
> >--
> >Sean Dague
> >IBM Linux Technology Center
> >email: sdague at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> >alt-email: sldague at us.ibm.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20121129/c675e275/attachment.html>