[openstack-dev] [Quantum] [LBaaS] Weekly Meeting
Dan Wendlandt
dan at nicira.com
Wed Nov 28 21:14:59 UTC 2012
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at radware.com>wrote:
> I also agree.
> The key thing is that if we need this "special" meeting we should give
> enough time for everyone to be aware of this.
>
yes, announcing it on the ML and or at the main team meeting (as occurred
yesterday), or ideally both, should be sufficient.
dan
>
> Thanks,
> -Sam.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sachin Thakkar [mailto:sthakkar at vmware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 6:00 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [LBaaS] Weekly Meeting
>
> I agree with this approach. Let's schedule these as a one-off in the event
> that specific unresolved items are uncovered. This will let the team focus
> on the implementation as the primary effort.
>
> -Sachin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anand Palanisamy" <apalanisamy at paypal.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 6:35:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [LBaaS] Weekly Meeting
>
>
>
> Sure Youcef. I hope, this is fine with everyone.
>
>
> --Anand
>
>
> From: Youcef Laribi < Youcef.Laribi at eu.citrix.com >
> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org >
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 00:29:21 +0000
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List < openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [LBaaS] Weekly Meeting
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Anand,
>
>
>
> I think the implementation/blueprint progress should continue to be done
> in the Quantum IRC meetings as is the case now, but for any design issues
> that are not completely clear or agreed over the ML, or if you want to
> raise a specific topic (e.g. project process), then we should schedule an
> ad-hoc LBaaS meeting with a clear agenda (preferably over phone conf call
> and screen sharing). The mailing list should also be updated afterwards
> with notes from the meeting to give the absents a chance to understand what
> was discussed and voice their opinions.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Youcef
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Palanisamy, Anand [ mailto:apalanisamy at paypal.com ]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:56 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] [LBaaS] Weekly Meeting
>
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
>
>
> I feel that LBaaS needs a separate weekly meeting (possibly with phone
> call conference as we did earlier) on top of the wider Quantum meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please let me know your suggestions.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Anand _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev
> mailing list OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20121128/320cf882/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list