Open Stack

On Sat, Nov 17 2012, Doug Hellmann wrote:

> I'm not sure we can tell, from the inside of ceilometer, what a unique
> identifier for a resource described by a given meter event should be. I
> think the intent was that the sender would do whatever was necessary to
> ensure it was unique. If the sender is concerned about collisions, it could
> prefix the resource id with some constant identifying the sender.

Ok. I'm fine with that too, but somehow think we should emphasis a bit
somewhere in the documentation, because I really though that source
assured isolation between resource IDs.

-- 
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker & freelance
-- http://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20121117/89703f79/attachment.pgp>