Open Stack

Okay, thanks Mark for giving us some good food for thought. I would
like to propose a different set of 3rd and 4th paragraphs in the
"direction motion" for us to consider. The first two paragraphs are
great.

---

We see Incubation as a category for projects who would like to have a
trial period to share resources and integrate with other OpenStack
projects. While we as a technical committee need time to evaluate
projects for inclusion in the OpenStack shared resource set (for
example, release management, integrated testing and releases,
continuous integration, documentation, Summit discussion time, and so
on), there should be an end-result for an Incubation period to result
in a final destination that is not related to all the current
privileges given to Core projects.

We see trademark privileges as unrelated of the day-to-day work needed
to create and maintain related, integrated OpenStack projects. Because
trademark is irrelevant to the other privileges given to a Core
project, having the term "Core OpenStack Project" in section 4.1.b of
the bylaws related to trademark is unnecessary.
---

I'm also having trouble with "the devil's in the details" and choosing
a vague first direction, apologies for that.

Thanks -
Anne

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> The TC should have an agreed direction when we talk to the Board and
>> when a decision is reached with the Board, that should come back and be
>> voted on by the TC.
>>
>> i.e. the TC should vote on a direction now and then vote on the detailed
>> decision later.
>>
>> Here's a first attempt at a "direction motion" for the TC to vote on:
>> [...]
>> Please feel free to suggest changes to this motion or, indeed, propose a
>> motion describing a different approach.
>
> So far, this is the only complete direction proposed. I know it's
> supported by a number of TC members but not all of them... and we'll
> have to decide at the next TC meeting on Tuesday on this "direction" and
> members to represent it. Time is running short to propose alternate
> "directions", so if you're not happy with this one, please post
> alternatives and variants asap so that they can be properly discussed here.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Chair, OpenStack Technical Committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev