Open Stack

On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:49 -0400, David Kranz wrote:
> Mark, I am perfectly OK with that. Please don't read too much into the 
> location. I just wanted to move from the randomly-named etherpad to a 
> more stable place and discovered there was a similarly-themed proposal 
> from a while back in that wiki location. I used the template there 
> because it was easy but this  is still just a working document. The PPB 
> doesn't need to be involved with the details of the guidelines.
> 
> With regard to your point (1), I think the major disagreement about 
> whether OpenStack has a commitment to API stability comes from outside. 
> An official statement from the PPB would help. As you said, we need to 
> flesh out the guidelines to help us actually implement that commitment. 
> I would also add:
> 
> (3) Reinforce for every one that API stability is a priority for 
> OpenStack as a whole, not individual projects.

Ok, great. I've added it to the PPB page ... hopefully that's the right
way to get it onto their agenda :)

http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/PPB

Cheers,
Mark.