Open Stack

Yes not acceptable 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 9, 2016, at 11:53 AM, Ade Lee <alee at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just a quick question:
> 
> Is AGPLv3+ an acceptable license for a third party library that is a
> dependency for an Openstack project?
> 
> I read: 
> (from http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html)
> 
> In order to be acceptable as dependencies of OpenStack projects,
> external libraries (produced and published by 3rd-party developers)
> must be licensed under an OSI-approved license that does not restrict
> distribution of the consuming project. The list of acceptable licenses
> includes ASLv2, BSD (both forms), MIT, PSF, LGPL, ISC, and MPL.
> Licenses considered incompatible with this requirement include GPLv2,
> GPLv3, and AGPL.
> 
> Is AGPL the same as AGPLv3 (and therefore not acceptable)?
> 
> Thanks, 
> Ade Lee
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-discuss mailing list
> legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster at dlapiper.com. Thank you.