[legal-discuss] license issue with barbican

Richard Fontana rfontana at redhat.com
Fri Jul 29 04:47:02 UTC 2016


Thomas Bechtold <tbechtold at suse.com> writes:

> Barbican has a plugin called dogtag[1]. This plugin imports "pki".
> While I tried to add pki as an extras requirement[2] I realized that
> it's dogtag-pki[3] that is required and not pki[4]. Using pki leads to
> an import error because there is code from dogtag-pki needed that is not
> in pki.
> So I started to look into dogtag-pki and wanted to add it to the global
> requirements repository but while doing that I realized that
> dogtag-pki's license is GPLv2. And according to[5] this is
> incompatible.
>
> How to handle this? Should the dogtag plugin be removed from barbican's
> source tree?

The Dogtag project is looking into relicensing dogtag-pki under the
LGPL.

Richard



More information about the legal-discuss mailing list