Open Stack

On 12/26/2016 07:27 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> PSF is ok per (https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/licensing.html)
> Though the overriding the _read() seems like something that could
> break easily

Yah - you can't relicense it - but you can include it with the PSF
license. It might be worth adding a PSF license header to that file and
a note that the code is copied from [0]

That said - I agree with dims, overriding the _read() method like that
seems prone to sadness.

> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Michał Jastrzębski <inc007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Added all and tc tags, as it might affect everyone really.
>>
>> On 25 December 2016 at 23:04, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Recently, Kolla project has requirement to modify[1] the python's
>>> ConfigParser.py code[0].
>>>
>>> Python is using PSF license[3], which is GPL compatible. But OpenStack
>>> is using Apache License.
>>>
>>> Here is the diff view[2].
>>>
>>> I want to make sure: is it OK to re-license ConfigParser.py? If not, what
>>> the solution?
>>>
>>> [0] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/2.7/Lib/ConfigParser.py
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/412101
>>> [2]
>>> https://gist.github.com/jeffrey4l/2258b276cbd038e73797cfa0952da371/revisions?diff=split
>>> [3] https://docs.python.org/3/license.html
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Jeffrey Zhang
>>> Blog: http://xcodest.me
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> legal-discuss mailing list
>>> legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> legal-discuss mailing list
>> legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss
> 
> 
>