On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Richard Fontana <rfontana at redhat.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:12:16PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > > On 03/20/2014 01:06 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > The Nova project is looking to move the content of design > specifications > > > to a git repository for the Juno development cycle [1]. The contents > of > > > this repository will not be code. It will primarily be documentation. > > > > > > Right now we put the Apache 2 LICENSE file in the repository and have > > > the same license header in the template used for specifications. > > > > > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/LICENSE > > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/template.rst > > > > > > Is this licensing the proper choice here? If not, what should we use > > > instead? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030576.html > > > > > > > To possibly answer my own question ... > > > > I found in a previous thread that the board officially approved using > > CC-BY for documentation here: > > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/15Oct2012BoardMinutes#Approval_of_the_CCBY_License_for_Documentation > . > > > > So perhaps we should be using that since this is effectively > > documentation? I also expect that this content be used heavily when > > developing the official project documentation based on the features > > described in these specifications. > > Perhaps something that the Foundation staff should decide as part of > implementing the CC BY policy for documentation. > +1 I know a draft memo is started but it hasn't made it on a Board meeting agenda to my knowledge. Anne > > - RF > > _______________________________________________ > legal-discuss mailing list > legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/legal-discuss/attachments/20140320/e57eb9a7/attachment-0001.html>