[legal-discuss] [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Why is marconi a queue implementation vs a provisioning API?
Radcliffe, Mark
Mark.Radcliffe at dlapiper.com
Thu Mar 20 14:17:04 UTC 2014
We need to carefully consider the scope of the waiver, its enforceability and whether it could be modified in the future.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Fontana [mailto:rfontana at redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 6:46 AM
To: Van Lindberg
Cc: legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [legal-discuss] [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Why is marconi a queue implementation vs a provisioning API?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Van Lindberg wrote:
> Such a policy needs to be made on a project-by-project basis, as well,
> especially w/r/t AGPL code. MongoDB/10Gen has communicated very
> clearly where they consider their copyright boundary to exist, and I
> believe that legally that functions as a waiver/license if they would
> ever end up being wrong (which I don't think they would, as I believe
> a network communication creates a copyright boundary).
I agree with this.
There really isn't enough AGPL code in existence to necessitate a non-case-specific policy (apart from a policy that calls for case-specific treatment).
- RF
_______________________________________________
legal-discuss mailing list
legal-discuss at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-discuss
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster at dlapiper.com. Thank you.
More information about the legal-discuss
mailing list