[legal-discuss] Licensing of documentation
Richard Fontana
rfontana at redhat.com
Wed Dec 11 07:15:16 UTC 2013
Hi,
Certain manuals available at docs.openstack.org contain this legal
notice:
Copyright © 2013 OpenStack Foundation
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you
may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may
obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied. See the License for the specific language governing
permissions and limitations under the License.
followed immdiately by a box that says:
Except where otherwise noted, this document is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
This github repository suggests at quickest glance that Apache License
2.0 is the license: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals
Some docs writers at Red Hat were previously under the impression that
CC BY was the license of OpenStack documentation, which I assume is
incorrect except for material specifically on wiki.openstack.org.
Can anyone clarify? We'd like to adapt some portions of the upstream
documentation in our product documentation and we want to make sure we
get the licensing right.
Thanks!
Richard Fontana
Legal
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the legal-discuss
mailing list