[Elections-committee] Draft Condorcet Briefing Paper for Committee Review

Doug Hellmann doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com
Tue Oct 15 14:04:42 UTC 2013


Under "Benefits of Condorcet/Schulze" the phrase "The fact that STV is in
use by the OpenStack Technical Committee" should say "Condorcet/Schulze"
not "STV", right?


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:

> I shameless copied the document that Simon put together, because he's
> better at documents than I am, and put in information about Condorcet.
>
> If anyone want me to put more math in it, I'm happy to do the.
>
> Monty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elections-committee mailing list
> Elections-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/elections-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/elections-committee/attachments/20131015/c171aa43/attachment.html>


More information about the Elections-committee mailing list