Open Stack

I'd like to get some +1s on the list about the new guidelines concept.

I was planning a write up tomorrow (Thurs) morning.  If you were on the 
call today and liked what we talked about, please send a +1 on this 
thread and we'll accelerate reporting to the board.

Let's plan to tell the board on Friday that we'll present capabilities 
for a vote.


On 02/25/2015 05:11 PM, Van Lindberg wrote:
> Should we forward this on to the board?
>
> From: Van Lindberg <van.lindberg at rackspace.com 
> <mailto:van.lindberg at rackspace.com>>
> Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 1:51 PM
> To: "defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org>" 
> <defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
> Cc: Egle Sigler <egle.sigler at rackspace.com 
> <mailto:egle.sigler at rackspace.com>>, Adrian Otto 
> <adrian.otto at rackspace.com <mailto:adrian.otto at rackspace.com>>
> Subject: [OpenStack-DefCore] Draft 2015.03 Spec
>
> Hello all
>
> Per the discussion today and at the face to face meeting last week, we 
> have the following draft 2015.03 spec for comments and approval:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/defcore-draft-spec-2015.03
>
> Notes:
> - There are two advisory sections: auth-token (which we created a 
> placeholder for) and compute-servers-metadata (which didn’t exist in 
> havanacore, but was in icehousecore). Because the point of this doc is 
> “havanacore - anything possibly troublesome,” we suggested moving 
> compute-servers-metadata to advisory for action in 2015.04.
> - This is .rst formatted and designed for human consumption. There is 
> a linked (and also authoritative) .json file for machine consumption.
> - The .json file (draft in gdoc for easy multi-editing right now) has 
> everything that is not mandatory or advisory removed.
> - We updated the versioning of the .json file (to 1.1), removed 
> “status” from the top-level, and added “advisory” flags for those two 
> items that were advisory. We also updated “core” to false for the two 
> advisory items.
> - We need designated sections for keystone.
>
> Thanks,
> Van
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee

-- 
   

Rob
____________________________
Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522

I am in CENTRAL (-6) time
http://robhirschfeld.com
twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20150226/1ed0e974/attachment.html>