Open Stack

> On October 17, 2014 at 8:27 AM Troy Toman <troy at tomanator.com> wrote:
>   
>  My concern is that if the capability is defined as ‘images-v1’ and the
> resolution is ‘images-v2’, we need to make sure that becomes a replacement
> capability vs. a superset. Similarly, the floating IP and security groups
> capabilities are defined based on API extensions and implementations in Nova.
> If the resolution comes through Neutron only improvements, that needs to be
> reflected in the required capabilities. The problem comes when we have a goal
> of not removing capabilities easily on a going forward basis.
> 

Would it help if we kept some of these capabilities as advisory in Icehouse?  We
could promote the consensus ones to approved and then continue discussing these.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20141017/6e13baf7/attachment.html>