Open Stack

On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Rob Hirschfeld <rob at zehicle.com> wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> It was proposed by the Foundation because it mirrors the marketing messaging that they use in describing OpenStack.
> 
> A long time back, we were having some debates about programs vs projects.
> 
> Overall, the "programs" that we are talking about here appear to line up consistently with the technical team programs.

It looks like most of the things on the diagram listed as part of the “Compute” program are actually managed by several different programs as defined by the TC [1]. We’re discussing dropping the use of the word “programs” for teams [2], but I still think the difference in the two uses is going to be potentially confusing.

[1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125783/

Doug

> 
> Rob
> 
> On 10/16/2014 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Did you choose the word “Program” to mirror the team structure? Because the program teams don’t line up the way the programs in the diagram do, and that might end up being confusing if we have another case of 2 meanings for the same word.
>> 
>> Other than that, I like the direction this is going!
>> 
>> Doug
>> 
>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:02 AM, rob at zehicle.com wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>>  Please review the following graphic as part of our board meeting.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rob
>>> ____________________________
>>> Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522
>>> 
>>> I am in CENTRAL (-6) time
>>> http://robhirschfeld.com
>>> twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt
>>> <Untitled drawing.png>_______________________________________________
>>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>>> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
> 
> -- 
>  
> Rob
> ____________________________
> Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522
> 
> I am in CENTRAL (-6) time
> http://robhirschfeld.com
> twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt
>