[OpenStack-DefCore] Draft Response to TC about Designated Section
Mark McLoughlin
markmc at redhat.com
Fri Mar 21 07:12:30 UTC 2014
Thing single most helpful thing so far IMHO was the etherpad that
demonstrated the granularity that DefCore expected. I think that came as
a great surprise to the TC. It would be odd for the response from
DefCore to not mention that.
Mark.
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 03:40 +0000, Rob_Hirschfeld at Dell.com wrote:
> DefCore,
>
> We've had several discussions about the TC's questions for designated sections and have draft response. Our response does not have a specific action, but identifies several options that we could choose. There are still unanswers questions from the TC and we are meeting next week to resolve those in a phone meeting.
>
> Before we send to the TC on Monday, we'd like to get comments and additions to the draft from the DefCore committee.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HYwxVjVDhLYD4zE8MraT-3l5lKoOCV8AKXfPRmW_ASc/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Feel free to use the comment feature in Google docs. If you have extensive edits, we can add you to the editor's list,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rob
> ______________________________
> Rob Hirschfeld
> Sr. Distinguished Cloud Solution Architect
> Dell | Cloud Edge, Data Center Solutions
> cell +1 512 909-7219 blog robhirschfeld.com, twitter @zehicle
> Please note, I am based in the CENTRAL (-6) time zone
>
> _______________________________________________
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> Defcore-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
More information about the Defcore-committee
mailing list