Search results for "canceled meeting" - openstack-discuss

[baremetal-sig][ironic] Future of baremetal-sig

by Jay Faulkner

Stackers, An item came up in the Ironic meeting today regarding the future of the baremetal sig. Essentially, Arne was doing great work sourcing talks for it, but now he's going to be unable to continue hosting it and proactively sourcing talks. (A seriously big thanks is owed to Arne for doing a great job on this!) This led us to wonder if BM SIG in its current form remains sustainable. Some options we can consider include: - Keep the BM SIG as-is, cancel it months where there's not a talk available. - Change the BM SIG meetings to more of a meetup style for operators to talk about Ironic - Something else entirely we haven't thought about yet. What do you all think? - Jay Faulkner

2 years, 8 months

[oslo] Schedule for the rest of 2019

by Ben Nemec

Hi, I said in the meeting I would send this out Monday, but then I didn't. Sorry. :-) I mentioned I was probably going to be out some this week and it looks like I'll be taking the afternoons off. How many? Who knows! Planning is really hard right now. Probably at least the rest of this week, and possibly into next week. So TLDR: If you need to get ahold of me, do it in the morning. I may not be available after that. I also expect the 20th to be my last working day for the year, so I'm going to take this opportunity to cancel the Oslo meetings on the 23rd and 30th. We'll resume in the new year on the 6th. Thanks. -Ben

5 years, 5 months

RE: FW: 2020 OSF Events & coronavirus

by Arkady.Kanevsky＠dell.com

Agree that going virtual makes most sense given current status From: Emilien Macchi <emilien(a)redhat.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 5:46 PM To: Mark Collier Cc: openstack-discuss; Jonathan Bryce Subject: Re: FW: 2020 OSF Events & coronavirus [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Hi Mark, Thanks for the transparency, as usual. I have a few thoughts, please read inline. On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:04 PM Mark Collier <mark(a)openstack.org<mailto:mark@openstack.org>> wrote: upcoming event in Vancouver is no exception. The OpenDev tracks > each morning will be programmed by volunteers from the community, and the project > teams will be organizing their own conversations as well each afternoon M-W, and > all day Thursday. > > But the larger question is here: should the show go on? > > The short answer is that as of now, the Vancouver and Berlin events are still > scheduled to happen in June (8-11) and October (19-23), respectively. > > However, we are willing to cancel or approach the events in a different way (i.e. > virtual) if the facts indicate that is the best path, and we know the facts are > changing rapidly. One of the most critical inputs we need is to hear from each of > you. We know that many of you rely on the twice-annual events to get together and > make rapid progress on the software, which is one reason we are not making any > decisions in haste. We also know that many of you may be unable or unwilling to > travel in June, and that is critical information to hear as we get closer to the > event so that we can make the most informed decision. I believe that we, as a community should show the example and our strengths by cancelling the Vancouver event and organize a virtual event like some other big events are doing. There is an opportunity for the OSF to show leadership in Software communities and acknowledge the risk of spread during that meeting; not only for the people attending it but for also those in contact with these people later. I'm not a doctor nor I know much about the virus; but I'm not interested to travel and take the risk to 1) catch the virus and 2) spread it at home and in my country; and as a community member, I feel like our responsibility is also to maintain ourselves healthy. In my opinion, the sooner we cancel, the better we can focus on organizing the virtual meetings, and also we can influence more communities to take that kind of decisions. Thanks Mark for starting that discussion, it's a perfect sign of how healthy is our community; and hopefully it will continue to be. -- Emilien Macchi

5 years, 2 months

Re: [Watcher] confused about meeting schedule

by info＠dantalion.nl

Hello Licanwei, I understand, we will continue irc meetings when it is possible. Your and other contributors health is naturally more important. Stay safe, Kind regards, Corne Lukken On 2/3/20 8:17 AM, licanwei wrote: > Hi Corne, > Sorry for the confusion, it's my fault. i don't realised that the week changed with the new year. > There were the Chinese new year holiday in the last two weeks, so we cancelled the irc meeting. > Because of the 2019-nCov, we had told to stay at home, i don't know if i can go to work next week, if i can, we will have the irc meeting on 12th Febr. and if not, i will send a notification mail. > > Thanks, > licanwei > > > > > > | | > licanwei_cn > | > | > 邮箱：licanwei_cn(a)163.com > | > > 签名由网易邮箱大师定制 > > On 01/22/2020 16:07, info(a)dantalion.nl wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The documentation for Watcher states that meetings will be held on a > bi-weekly basis on odd-weeks, however, last meeting was held on the 8th > of January which is not an odd-week. > > Today I was expecting a meeting as the meetings are held bi-weekly and > the last one was held on the 8th of January, however, there was none. > > Can someone clarify when the next meeting will be held and the > subsequent one after that? > > If these are on even weeks we should also update Watcher's documentation. > > Kind regards, > Corne lukken >

5 years, 4 months

Re: [Interop][Refstack] this Friday meeting

by prakash RAMCHANDRAN

Typo:Wallaby not Vote. Tha's a different topic related to TC voting and who are contesting for TC? Plus PTG plans on 19th and beyond, coverage and was planning to attend besides Interop, possibly Airship and Triple-O changes wrt Ironic. It's impact on Zun and COEs in OpenStack K over O. ThxPrakash Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 7:37 AM, prakash RAMCHANDRAN<pramchan(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Hi all, Have a vaccine apptmt at 9.40 PDT. Depending on the schedule may get late or may miss. Wanted to get some feedback on testing results but still have 1 more week and next one will depend on where I am and try catch up if I miss on etherpad as what is the results and where we are Wallaby on way next week and Xena release planned for Ocober https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html#w-final What's new in Wallaby and what Tempest testing get impacted in vote and add-ons. ThanksPrakashFor InteropWG Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:11 AM, prakash RAMCHANDRAN<pramchan(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Looks like we can skip this Friday call and sure Arkady - lets cancel it. If you have something urgent we can talk offline - Thanks Prakash On Thursday, April 1, 2021, 11:06:25 AM PDT, Vida Haririan <vhariria(a)redhat.com> wrote: Hi Arkady, Friday is a company holiday and I will be ooo. Thanks,Vida On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:10 AM Jimmy McArthur <jimmy(a)openstack.org> wrote: I forgot this is a holiday. Same on my side. Thanks, Jimmy > On Apr 1, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Ghanshyam Mann <gmann(a)ghanshyammann.com> wrote: > > > ---- On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 09:15:21 -0500 Kanevsky, Arkady <Arkady.Kanevsky(a)dell.com> wrote ---- >> >> Team, >> This Friday is Good Friday and some people have a day off. >> Should we cancel this week meeting? >> Please, respond so we can see if we will have quorum. > > Thanks Arkady, > > I will be off from work and would not be able to join. > > -gmann > >> Thanks, >> Arkady >> >> Arkady Kanevsky, Ph.D. >> SP Chief Technologist & DE >> Dell Technologies office of CTO >> Dell Inc. One Dell Way, MS PS2-91 >> Round Rock, TX 78682, USA >> Phone: 512 7204955 >> >> >

4 years, 1 month

Re: [Watcher] confused about meeting schedule

by Mohammed Naser

Thanks for updating licanwei :) On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:23 AM licanwei <licanwei_cn(a)163.com> wrote: > Hi Corne, > Sorry for the confusion, it's my fault. i don't realised that the week > changed with the new year. > There were the Chinese new year holiday in the last two weeks, so we > cancelled the irc meeting. > Because of the 2019-nCov, we had told to stay at home, i don't know if i > can go to work next week, if i can, we will have the irc meeting on 12th > Febr. and if not, i will send a notification mail. > > Thanks, > licanwei > > > > > licanwei_cn > 邮箱：licanwei_cn(a)163.com > > <https://maas.mail.163.com/dashi-web-extend/html/proSignature.html?ftlId=1&n…> > > 签名由网易邮箱大师 <https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail88> 定制 > > On 01/22/2020 16:07, info(a)dantalion.nl wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The documentation for Watcher states that meetings will be held on a > bi-weekly basis on odd-weeks, however, last meeting was held on the 8th > of January which is not an odd-week. > > Today I was expecting a meeting as the meetings are held bi-weekly and > the last one was held on the 8th of January, however, there was none. > > Can someone clarify when the next meeting will be held and the > subsequent one after that? > > If these are on even weeks we should also update Watcher's documentation. > > Kind regards, > Corne lukken > > -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost ----------------------------------------------------- D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mnaser(a)vexxhost.com W. https://vexxhost.com

5 years, 4 months

Re: [kolla][ptg] virtual PTG

by Mark Goddard

On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 15:36, Pierre Riteau <pierre(a)stackhpc.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 11:06, Mark Goddard <mark(a)stackhpc.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> For Victoria we will again be having a virtual PTG, however this time >> due to "you know what" we will be holding it at the same time as the >> other teams. >> >> The PTG will take place from 1st - 5th June, with various slots [1] >> available throughout the day from which we can select. Looking at >> previous events [2][3], we had two four hour slots. For Train this was >> 12:00 - 16:00 UTC, and for Ussuri 14:00 - 18:00 UTC. Note that Train >> was during daylight savings, Ussuri was not. We also held a mid-Train >> planning session for Kayobe [4], which took two hours. >> >> Based on the above, I suggest we go with the same as Ussuri: >> >> Monday 1st: 14:00 - 18:00 UTC (kolla) >> Tuesday 2nd: 14:00 - 18:00 UTC (kolla) >> Wednesday 3rd: 14:00 - 16:00 UTC (kayobe) >> >> This is just a proposal - if you would like to attend these sessions >> and the above time slots do not work for you, please get in touch. In >> particular, please speak up if these slots are significantly out of >> your working day - with sufficient interest we could split sessions >> across timezones. >> >> [1] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/126u8ek25noy >> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-ussuri-ptg >> [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-train-ptg >> [4] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kayobe-train-planning >> >> Cheers, >> Mark > > > Thanks Mark for setting this up! > > I suppose the Kolla IRC meeting would be cancelled that week? It conflicts with the proposed Kayobe slot. Thinking ahead as always Pierre :) I expect we'll be seeing enough of each other that week and will cancel the IRC meeting. > > Cheers, > Pierre

5 years, 1 month

Re: FW: 2020 OSF Events & coronavirus

by Sagi Shnaidman

Hi, all I think the Openstack community has more virtual collaboration experience than any other community and maybe it's a good chance for us to establish an efficient way to make a virtual summit. I'm not alone thinking virtual summits/webinars/whatever are much less efficient than in-person meetings and hanging out together. But in current circumstances, it doesn't seem like an option, so why not try brainstorm about how we still can do a virtual summit and get most of it? Main issues with virtual meetings that I can see are: - topics discussions in a big group of people, while virtual meetings often less convenient and sometimes are tough[1] - the important things happen also *between* sessions, not during them - what would replace booths (and swags of course)? - PTG project rooms which are used both for internal discussions and collaboration between various projects - informal mingling I'm not sure all of these and other issues can be easily replaced virtually, but who knows, maybe we can still make it work. Like maybe constant open video sessions which mimic rooms and booths, some of the discussions moved to dedicated IRC channels. On the flip side, the offline summit had restrictions as well, so we can do things in a virtual summit we couldn't (or couldn't do so much) in offline ones. Maybe more presenters will have a chance to make sessions since we are not so limited in time online and all sessions can be recorded as well. And we don't need a projector in every PTG room now :) I'd propose creating a page where people can put their ideas on how to make good things we have in the offline summit to be virtual or add something new, which couldn't be done in the offline summit. Since we created recently "Ideas for OpenStack" page[2], maybe it's a good candidate to hold these ideas in. Just reminding that Openstack is not the only project that cancels offline meetings and efficient virtual collaboration is a very hot topic right now all over the world. I think the Openstack community has all the resources to contribute from its experience to many other projects and companies and be leading in this area. WDYT? [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYu_bGbZiiQ [2] https://governance.openstack.org/ideas/index.html On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:13 PM <Arkady.Kanevsky(a)dell.com> wrote: > Agree that going virtual makes most sense given current status > > > > *From:* Emilien Macchi <emilien(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2020 5:46 PM > *To:* Mark Collier > *Cc:* openstack-discuss; Jonathan Bryce > *Subject:* Re: FW: 2020 OSF Events & coronavirus > > > > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > > Hi Mark, > > > > Thanks for the transparency, as usual. I have a few thoughts, please read > inline. > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:04 PM Mark Collier <mark(a)openstack.org> wrote: > > upcoming event in Vancouver is no exception. The OpenDev tracks > > each morning will be programmed by volunteers from the community, and > the project > > teams will be organizing their own conversations as well each afternoon > M-W, and > > all day Thursday. > > > > But the larger question is here: should the show go on? > > > > The short answer is that as of now, the Vancouver and Berlin events are > still > > scheduled to happen in June (8-11) and October (19-23), respectively. > > > > However, we are willing to cancel or approach the events in a different > way (i.e. > > virtual) if the facts indicate that is the best path, and we know the > facts are > > changing rapidly. One of the most critical inputs we need is to hear > from each of > > you. We know that many of you rely on the twice-annual events to get > together and > > make rapid progress on the software, which is one reason we are not > making any > > decisions in haste. We also know that many of you may be unable or > unwilling to > > travel in June, and that is critical information to hear as we get > closer to the > > event so that we can make the most informed decision. > > > I believe that we, as a community should show the example and our > strengths by cancelling the Vancouver event and organize a virtual event > like some other big events are doing. > > There is an opportunity for the OSF to show leadership in Software > communities and acknowledge the risk of spread during that meeting; not > only for the people attending it but for also those in contact with these > people later. > > > > I'm not a doctor nor I know much about the virus; but I'm not interested > to travel and take the risk to 1) catch the virus and 2) spread it at home > and in my country; and as a community member, I feel like our > responsibility is also to maintain ourselves healthy. > > > > In my opinion, the sooner we cancel, the better we can focus on organizing > the virtual meetings, and also we can influence more communities to take > that kind of decisions. > > > > Thanks Mark for starting that discussion, it's a perfect sign of how > healthy is our community; and hopefully it will continue to be. > > -- > > Emilien Macchi > -- Best regards Sagi Shnaidman

5 years, 2 months

[tc][all] OpenStack Technical Committee Weekly Summary and Meeting Agenda (2025.1/R-23)

by Goutham Pacha Ravi

Hello Stackers, This week, the OpenStack community is convening virtually to set the agenda for the 2025.1 "Epoxy" release and beyond [1][2]. As of today, there are 33 different discussion tracks spread over five days. Now's as good a time as ever to review the Community Code of Conduct as we step into this event [3]. In the past week, the North American section of the OpenInfra community gathered in Indianapolis (and virtually) for a two-day conference. I had the privilege to attend in person and chat with numerous users, operators, and contributors. The community is as energetic as ever, as evidenced by the participation we saw in the leadership meet-and-greet event [4]. Amy Marrich (spotz) organized this event, and we had representation from the OpenInfra Board, Zuul, OpenStack TC, SIGs, and PTLs. The audience learned the essence of our "Open Community," how elections are conducted, what different community leadership roles are, and how one can participate in OpenInfra governance. We brainstormed how to revive projects with dwindling contributors and recapped takeaways from the "Bridging the Gap" and Security SIG-related discussions. Prof. Corey Leong (profcorey) from Valencia College volunteered to propose a "Higher Education" Special Interest Group focused on increasing awareness and creating learning material for university students interested in joining the OpenStack community. I'll share a link with video recordings of this conference in a future post. === Weekly Meeting === Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) chaired the weekly IRC meeting [5] of the OpenStack Technical Committee last week. We had fewer attendees than usual, but it was a productive discussion nevertheless. We prepped the TC's PTG etherpad [6] with topics and timings for the discussion. As is tradition, please allow flexibility in terms of the discussion schedule. Discussions may start a bit later (or earlier) than planned, and we'll have to be dynamic to accommodate scheduling conflicts, as many contributors are involved across multiple topics. In lieu of the PTG, the weekly IRC meeting scheduled for 2024-10-22 has been canceled [7]. We briefly discussed the leadership appointment patches concerning the Watcher and Mistral project teams. These are still being reviewed, and we'll try to get them closed out after the PTG week. We also discussed grenade job changes that Ghanshyam Mann (gmann) and other community members have been pursuing [8]. Concerns were raised about projects (like Kolla and Loci) publishing container images under the OpenStack name without a clear security policy. The need to clarify OpenStack's support and security posture on such deliverables was discussed. We have more to discuss on this topic at the PTG and beyond. The next weekly IRC meeting for the OpenStack Technical Committee is on 2024-10-29. The agenda is up early [9], but I'll write to you once again before it is formalized. I look forward to seeing you all at the PTG and possibly seeding more topics for this weekly meeting afterward. === Governance Proposals === ==== Open for Review ==== Add Cinder Huawei charm | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/867588 Appoint Ke Chen as PTL for Watcher | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/932419 Adding Axel Vanzaghi as PTL for Mistral | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/927962 Retire kuryr-kubernetes and kuryr-tempest-plugin | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/922507 Propose a pop-up team for eventlet-removal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/931978 Propose to select the eventlet-removal community goal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/931254 === Upcoming Events === 2024-10-21 to 2024-10-25: OpenInfra Project Teams Gathering: https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ 2024-10-27: All Things Open: https://allthingsopen.org/ 2024-11-04: OpenInfra Board Meeting: https://board.openinfra.dev/ 2024-11-15: KubeCon + CloudNativeCon: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/kubecon-cloudnativecon-north-america/ Thank you very much for reading! On behalf of the OpenStack TC, Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr) OpenStack TC Chair [1] 2025.1 "Epoxy" Release Schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html [2] "Epoxy" PTG Schedule: https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html [3] OpenInfra Community Code of Conduct: https://openinfra.dev/legal/code-of-conduct [4] OpenInfra Leadership Meet-and-Greet: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/leadership-na [5] TC Meeting IRC Log, 2024-10-15: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2024/tc.2024-10-15-18.00.log.html [6] TC PTG Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/oct2024-ptg-os-tc [7] TC IRC meeting 2024-10-22 is canceled: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [8] Grenade Job changes: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [9] TC Meeting Agenda, 2024-10-29: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting

7 months, 2 weeks

[blazar] PTL away

by Pierre Riteau

Hello, I'll be away for the next couple of weeks for paternity leave. All Blazar meetings are cancelled in the meantime. Pierre Riteau (priteau)

4 years, 7 months

openstack-discuss search results for query "canceled meeting"