Build failed. - glance-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/38/38f199507aff8bfcaf81ad9ea58ea326224faf5f/releas... : FAILURE in 1m 44s - glance-tarball http://logs.openstack.org/38/38f199507aff8bfcaf81ad9ea58ea326224faf5f/releas... : FAILURE in 1m 49s - glance-tarball-signing glance-tarball-signing : SKIPPED - glance-announce-release glance-announce-release : SKIPPED
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:44:18AM +0000, jenkins@openstack.org wrote:
Build failed.
- glance-docs-ubuntu-xenial http://logs.openstack.org/38/38f199507aff8bfcaf81ad9ea58ea326224faf5f/releas... : FAILURE in 1m 44s
This boils down to [1] which is a known problem with newer cryptography (and the interaction with openssl). What I don't understand is how we got there with constratints working[2]. Perhaps it's the openssl on the release sigining node is "newer" than general nodepool nodes? Yours Tony. [1] http://logs.openstack.org/38/38f199507aff8bfcaf81ad9ea58ea326224faf5f/releas... [2] http://logs.openstack.org/38/38f199507aff8bfcaf81ad9ea58ea326224faf5f/releas...
participants (2)
-
jenkins@openstack.org
-
Tony Breeds