Stable check of openstack/keystone failed
Build failed.
- periodic-keystone-docs-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-docs-havana/e43a... : SUCCESS in 2m 33s - periodic-keystone-python26-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python26-havana/... : FAILURE in 20m 37s - periodic-keystone-python27-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-havana/... : FAILURE in 13m 09s
Hi Dolph and Jamie,
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-havana/... : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
Cheers, Alan
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:53 +0200, Alan Pevec wrote:
Hi Dolph and Jamie,
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-havana/... : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
Cheers, Alan
Alan,
I went back through the stevedore changelog (http://stevedore.readthedocs.org/en/latest/history.html ) and ran the tests i have (not all committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work just fine.
Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global requirements.
Jamie
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-havana/... : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
I went back through the stevedore changelog (http://stevedore.readthedocs.org/en/latest/history.html ) and ran the tests i have (not all committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work just fine.
Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global requirements.
It needs to be added to Keystone Havana deps, keystoneclient master is checked out directly from git and running in Keystone's venv.
https://review.openstack.org/106974
Cheers, Alan
Hi, I anyone actually reviewing stable patches. They seem to just be languishing endlessly. Thanks Gary
On 7/15/14, 12:47 PM, "Alan Pevec" apevec@gmail.com wrote:
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana
http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-hav ana/7db0b28 : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
I went back through the stevedore changelog
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://stevedore.readthedocs. org/en/latest/history.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZ o8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=9rh16MRiRDYykAoB27f%2BWTVXO YjeOsoHQDSsMxkF60Y%3D%0A&s=d0d83d74dc63b7644d450b796f0d156ff8c21d262f0861 ba0a9c40410c86c87e ) and ran the tests i have (not all committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work just fine.
Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global requirements.
It needs to be added to Keystone Havana deps, keystoneclient master is checked out directly from git and running in Keystone's venv.
https://review.openstack.org/106974
Cheers, Alan
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 15/07/14 11:50, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi, I anyone actually reviewing stable patches. They seem to just be languishing endlessly.
+1. Reviews for stable branches are not actively reviewed, even those that unbreak branches. I had a bad experience with havana glance backports that fixed sporadic test failures, that were not reviewed by anyone from stable cores for months, and I just abandoned those reviews.
How can we push review process? I know everyone is passionate about master and new features and developments, but stable branches are what is actually consumed by downstream distributors, and they majorly define the way our product looks to our users.
Is current stable maintainers' group overflowed with things to do? If so, should I consider sending a request to add me to stable maintainers?..
/Ihar
Thanks Gary
On 7/15/14, 12:47 PM, "Alan Pevec" apevec@gmail.com wrote:
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana
http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-hav
ana/7db0b28 : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
I went back through the stevedore changelog
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://stevedore.readthedocs.
org/en/latest/history.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZ
o8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=9rh16MRiRDYykAoB27f%2BWTVXO
YjeOsoHQDSsMxkF60Y%3D%0A&s=d0d83d74dc63b7644d450b796f0d156ff8c21d262f0861
ba0a9c40410c86c87e ) and ran the tests i have (not all committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work just fine.
Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global requirements.
It needs to be added to Keystone Havana deps, keystoneclient master is checked out directly from git and running in Keystone's venv.
https://review.openstack.org/106974
Cheers, Alan
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
I am not sure what to say. It would be nice if people review, if not then maybe we should just reconsider the stable idea all together...
On 7/15/14, 1:45 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" ihrachys@redhat.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 15/07/14 11:50, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi, I anyone actually reviewing stable patches. They seem to just be languishing endlessly.
+1. Reviews for stable branches are not actively reviewed, even those that unbreak branches. I had a bad experience with havana glance backports that fixed sporadic test failures, that were not reviewed by anyone from stable cores for months, and I just abandoned those reviews.
How can we push review process? I know everyone is passionate about master and new features and developments, but stable branches are what is actually consumed by downstream distributors, and they majorly define the way our product looks to our users.
Is current stable maintainers' group overflowed with things to do? If so, should I consider sending a request to add me to stable maintainers?..
/Ihar
Thanks Gary
On 7/15/14, 12:47 PM, "Alan Pevec" apevec@gmail.com wrote:
- periodic-keystone-python27-havana
http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-keystone-python27-h av
ana/7db0b28 : FAILURE in 13m 09s
"Plugin loading from config objects" was merged to keystoneclient master which adds stevedore dependency not present in Havana Keystone test-requirements. Havana global-requirements has stevedore>=0.10 is that enough or we need to bump Havana global to 0.14 ?
I went back through the stevedore changelog
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://stevedore.readthedoc s.
org/en/latest/history.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZ
o8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=9rh16MRiRDYykAoB27f%2BWTV XO
YjeOsoHQDSsMxkF60Y%3D%0A&s=d0d83d74dc63b7644d450b796f0d156ff8c21d262f0861
ba0a9c40410c86c87e ) and ran the tests i have (not all committed) and as far as i can tell the 0.10 version will work just fine.
Out of interest though how do we manage this? I can't submit to keystoneclient master a version that is not in the global requirements.
It needs to be added to Keystone Havana deps, keystoneclient master is checked out directly from git and running in Keystone's venv.
https://review.openstack.org/106974
Cheers, Alan
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-mai nt
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-main t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTxQY8AAoJEC5aWaUY1u57vp8H/33VESix2Blrq9153xBceriP Jzm+GTU/ZftiRUvwkEGTkRNnA3dCWKT3kLkTskqH00KHLsEoTBZje1c0FUyZD367 4MR+jpQNXBCndzJmYJNhb6tQI79QKLo1nR3H2l+ISSTYYsSizAoyHfD9+VbgmvRu 7aGtfLX2e9G5vCVSEUd/Gg9d53YKg2cfOukwKiEF1QLoG+S3DWqMnT4MI4ypdk5D 4+RFZb9auclpJI+OfoB1b5qa3uyDErpMsw8B2gKSoC4qZzVtwUPgBrsz53qYP+iG zGLApPpGtgO/WFdl3W/5jgAo3nY20nFYDNvMVuOly1JnSJVEmWmdeIqRdQyaHes= =AVJr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
gkotton@vmware.com napisao je:
I am not sure what to say. It would be nice if people review, if not then maybe we should just reconsider the stable idea all together...
We need stable/* at least for security fixes so I don't think abandoning them is an option. Membership review is long overdue, so everybody can consider this as a friendly warning to improve their stats :) Note that project PTLs are always included and should care about their project's stable branches.
On 7/15/14, 1:45 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" ihrachys@redhat.com wrote:
Is current stable maintainers' group overflowed with things to do?
I'd give benefit of doubt and assume so.
If so, should I consider sending a request to add me to stable
maintainers?
Yes, please do!
Cheers, Alan
participants (5)
-
Alan Pevec
-
Gary Kotton
-
Ihar Hrachyshka
-
Jamie Lennox
-
jenkins＠openstack.org