29 Oct
2014
29 Oct
'14
2:47 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Hi John/all,
it turned out that [1] broke DHCPv6, fixed by [2] (I've backported [2] to Juno). [1] was also backported to Icehouse [3], and I wonder whether we need to backport [2] to the branch. Though the code from [1] is present in the branch, I'm not sure whether we should consider DHCP port not created for IPv6 networks as a bug in Icehouse where we probably didn't have the feature implemented yet. Still, there may be other issues with not backporting the fix to Icehouse, so if you have some bad scenarios in mind, please tell me.
[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116832/ [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123671/ [3]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123074/
Cheers, /Ihar
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUUO/cAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57wmAH/AvTXZ8d7GqMz094V+GbRWGF
ZnRC/rRSwVQe47+YffvLDsGmf4NArUj/ThN2VXWWHiCuDUXXf/G902ZsZV8G6mF5
mSNX4bEF8alp5HUgIaj7yUSNUHqw5gOO24ZxLlPpSOaKKGfPV2qzf7BZl4HVOjfs
pWizKD6eRH24nNwrhfdXezJ0ZuSQFqN5A3lQ3GqVgL/hTbnKr2mL+JsGZyoAlGuP
3dmQAo/zBCW1Z1KOI3JyKBY78iiTy26FFwg1HCftht4NfO7RXS6G7qHYVOGf08Oc
/EDhwzThcIYSn+lxFhFUP27kAPhCKeiP62m55wAv1c2mDdw2NBe786C9QjW5oQc=
=Yqtb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3559
Age (days ago)
3559
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Ihar Hrachyshka