-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi John/all, it turned out that [1] broke DHCPv6, fixed by [2] (I've backported [2] to Juno). [1] was also backported to Icehouse [3], and I wonder whether we need to backport [2] to the branch. Though the code from [1] is present in the branch, I'm not sure whether we should consider DHCP port not created for IPv6 networks as a bug in Icehouse where we probably didn't have the feature implemented yet. Still, there may be other issues with not backporting the fix to Icehouse, so if you have some bad scenarios in mind, please tell me. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116832/ [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123671/ [3]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/123074/ Cheers, /Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUUO/cAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57wmAH/AvTXZ8d7GqMz094V+GbRWGF ZnRC/rRSwVQe47+YffvLDsGmf4NArUj/ThN2VXWWHiCuDUXXf/G902ZsZV8G6mF5 mSNX4bEF8alp5HUgIaj7yUSNUHqw5gOO24ZxLlPpSOaKKGfPV2qzf7BZl4HVOjfs pWizKD6eRH24nNwrhfdXezJ0ZuSQFqN5A3lQ3GqVgL/hTbnKr2mL+JsGZyoAlGuP 3dmQAo/zBCW1Z1KOI3JyKBY78iiTy26FFwg1HCftht4NfO7RXS6G7qHYVOGf08Oc /EDhwzThcIYSn+lxFhFUP27kAPhCKeiP62m55wAv1c2mDdw2NBe786C9QjW5oQc= =Yqtb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
Ihar Hrachyshka