Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-11-15 19:29:52 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...]
* openstack/ceilometer * openstack/cinder * openstack/glance * openstack/horizon * openstack/keystone * openstack/neutron * openstack/nova * openstack/swift [...]
I have created signed tags named folsom-eol on the tip of the stable/folsom branch in each of the above projects and then deleted those branches (after triple-checking they showed up correctly on our git mirrors).
Cool, thx for handling this.
* openstack-dev/devstack * openstack-dev/grenade * openstack/openstack-manuals * openstack/oslo-incubator * openstack/requirements * openstack/tempest
Any input as to what we should do about the stable/folsom branches on each of these? Contact the project teams responsible individually, or just treat them like the integrated release stable branches?
I would definitely contact the owners before removing the branches. Most of them are just supporting QA branches so they should cause no trouble. oslo-incubator should also be a no-brainer. openstack-manuals might be more complex, as there might be some job out there still publishing old doc versions, and might make some sense to keep that alive. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)