-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, there is a series of Neutron backports in the Juno queue that are intended to significantly improve service performance when handling security groups (one of the issues that are main pain points of current users): - - https://review.openstack.org/130101 - - https://review.openstack.org/130098 - - https://review.openstack.org/130100 - - https://review.openstack.org/130097 - - https://review.openstack.org/130105 The first four patches are optimizing db side (controller), while the last one is to avoid fetching security group rules by OVS agent when firewall is disabled. AFAIK we don't generally backport performance improvements unless they are very significant (though I don't see anything written in stone that says so), but knowing that those patches fix pain hotspots in Neutron, and seem rather isolated, should we consider their inclusion? Should we come up with some "official" rule on how we handle performance enhancement backports? /Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUUMAvAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57ZkMIAJmae7GdQ3rhRZVpUZkCGAUK 7i2qPqjVh0Qu++kgcMmbM6YPnT4p//OuOAiU9ak8l46TWdeqw9cC0vsGO4Es4MKC rX8pAT/KBgX4FPzTGxhHBk8g5XpD9i6SutGfdFBmoFwj0eV8BAxNTD2A+hmM2ZHO QLBAcNFYhh/9QSnfpdx885z6M+iQ8n91oo1lqugZEdtmpNdrY2nW0ovFHTfj/9ku qznykok80JBNl1KO15Aaru3aHJUoj8/C8ek+UzLN0VP0W+H2zJQJVbGBny1BIVYm odvijGbxvq2rN90HbtUUqNwcM6Mfbc76fDT/agJo4hIDxXfvzsQpKY8iegiEiOc= =bBLb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----