-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Wow. I haven't seen this review before. Probably only one of those changes should be applied. If the patch you've mentioned is enough to make logs more thin, then I revoke the backport requests. Also I wonder whether I need to revert my patch in master now... :| Cheers, /Ihar On 07/05/14 14:31, Doug Hellmann wrote:
How does the logging change you propose relate to the ones merged yesterday?
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I86b41f20342b4080859ee036220ddffa200f0562,n...
Doug
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys@redhat.com> wrote: Hi all,
please consider [1] for stable/icehouse to unblock merge for [2] that is already approved and was pushed to gate. Gate checks failed due to large sub_unit.log files generated for neutron.
I've also cherry-picked [3] the patch to reduce logs to stable/havana though I haven't seen similar failures there yet.
Cheers, /Ihar
[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92533/ [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90096/ [3]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92569/
_______________________________________________ Openstack-stable-maint mailing list Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTaisZAAoJEC5aWaUY1u576MMH/Ax9vh/EVE0LYPbW4ISAJBrJ 9KI0hbhU4ooX1p7R0Llaq62Y2o2ZgcgHzeNeZ8skJ2gz318OTC+yt5SjTo8k6A/R gf0NgSP4YEPBt06LoKCaF5j5F3pC0ZEgO87/7VLN+G6UuxeQJju6wo74Tr4x6TgT rU0vLec9qvuY1nx3ZfZY2TW/o1mz0OQcFGfpH8grSPOqKli38g5hvOoXd1C/3pzg iOHNBnIBibk/f7IjrCeP2f8azV7lhSI8w8uE4FDqxG/Yhl08SIlO+EcTsOUjxJej qhnrBjEyK1DFBncfseazHiH7Haj/BLabzBraf0Lnc0BE3qz9/OqWw3h3eZr0zvM= =cq7A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----