Yes, Gary is taking the lead as the maintainer of the stable branch in Quantum, so having him be part of the team is very valuable.<div><br></div><div>Dan</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Eoghan Glynn <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:eglynn@redhat.com" target="_blank">eglynn@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
&gt; Hey,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I figure I&#39;d abuse our new mailing list even though we set it up for<br>
&gt; Jenkins notifications :)<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Gary has been doing a tonne of work identifying fixes to backport to<br>
&gt; Quantum&#39;s stable/folsom:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;   <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:stable/folsom+owner:garyk,n,z" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:stable/folsom+owner:garyk,n,z</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I think he&#39;s showing good judgement about what constitutes a suitable<br>
&gt; fix for the stable branch. Any objections to adding him to<br>
&gt; stable-maint?<br>
<br>
</div>+1 ... IMO the more domain-expertise available to stable-maint, the better.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Eoghan<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org">Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>Dan Wendlandt <div>Nicira, Inc: <a href="http://www.nicira.com" target="_blank">www.nicira.com</a><br><div>twitter: danwendlandt<br>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br></div></div><br>
</div>