-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 20/08/14 10:05, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
[...] I hope I've described the existing oral tradition correctly. Please comment on that, and if we're ok with the way it's written above, I'd like to update our wiki pages ([1] and [2]) with that.
That matches my version of the oral tradition.
One point to note is that we should refrain from doing gratuitous oslo-incubator syncs, since the process is so painful :) Once oslo libraries graduate, they are handled through usual dependency version updates, which are not really encouraged in stable either. So this process should IMHO really be limited to critical bugs and security issues.
Hm. My (short) personal experience shows that in most cases synchronizations do not result in any pain. At least for modules that have settled a bit. I also think that spending time to cope with updates in oslo-incubator is beneficial for both oslo and affected projects. If anything, it reveals issues with underlying oslo code before we encounter a security issue or a major failure mode in incubator and then realize that we cannot easily sync the update to projects because they are too far from incubator reality. But, that's my envisioned ideal world. And it seems it's not the same as for other (more experienced) OpenStack developers. :) /Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT9FhsAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57yH8IAObVX86zq75u81dfern6e3bK P34f8uDlDLSj/jbTvQUwyB17AaN4z0uvh+qxvc3R9p281Qu+RtZhdOgYJUn2szDi jvRq7ULyrIIiFFlQmChiik2+g8u3SK6HsiZzP+GBr86oJS7VUy0iDfHj+oz51LdI ZBxyzc/cL32uhoqKNUw0VRUS4EU2UXyCp4+opkQl+hxHT8PczG/spOA/d8P8W+F9 cPxGNdYiERv9rySshGk27X65Xh1ouqeAcLbAzO1HK57cLqXD+Y7HOJ8yM3thDcMP w16n6iyr88OIjW0igB/8R9pY83vK4CEaBhTvm7C4hhGre2RsqGCk6ZcOMIWvTtU= =b7CW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----