Hello, team I have handled all the team join requests to OpenStack in Transifex, sending emails to inform the tool change and then rejecting them. I noticed there was no translations happened in Transifex after Oct. I think we could start to remove Openstack projects from Transifex. We may find a place to back up firstly, and then remove. Any objections to the remove ? Any suggestions about the back up ? Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
Hi Daisy, On Friday 27 November 2015, 15:58:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
I have handled all the team join requests to OpenStack in Transifex, sending emails to inform the tool change and then rejecting them.
I noticed there was no translations happened in Transifex after Oct. I think we could start to remove Openstack projects from Transifex. We may find a place to back up firstly, and then remove.
Any objections to the remove ?
Not at all!
Any suggestions about the back up ?
I wonder if the old stuff is still relevant. If we're sure all current text has been migrated to Zanata (and is backed up :-) why would we need a backup of Transifex? -- Thanks, Robert
Hello Robert, As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 UTC), we discussed this issue. During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to Transifex statistics data is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, Mitaka. Please see the following link (meeting log) for more details : http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2015/openstac... With many thanks, /Ian Robert Simai wrote on 12/11/2015 9:46 PM:
Hi Daisy,
On Friday 27 November 2015, 15:58:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
I have handled all the team join requests to OpenStack in Transifex, sending emails to inform the tool change and then rejecting them.
I noticed there was no translations happened in Transifex after Oct. I think we could start to remove Openstack projects from Transifex. We may find a place to back up firstly, and then remove.
Any objections to the remove ? Not at all!
Any suggestions about the back up ? I wonder if the old stuff is still relevant. If we're sure all current text has been migrated to Zanata (and is backed up :-) why would we need a backup of Transifex?
On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
Hello Robert,
As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 UTC), we discussed this issue.
During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to Transifex statistics data is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, Mitaka.
ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current release, so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active in Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka, there's no need to query transifex IMO. Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed, Andreas
Please see the following link (meeting log) for more details : http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2015/openstac...
With many thanks,
/Ian
Robert Simai wrote on 12/11/2015 9:46 PM:
Hi Daisy,
On Friday 27 November 2015, 15:58:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
I have handled all the team join requests to OpenStack in Transifex, sending emails to inform the tool change and then rejecting them.
I noticed there was no translations happened in Transifex after Oct. I think we could start to remove Openstack projects from Transifex. We may find a place to back up firstly, and then remove.
Any objections to the remove ? Not at all!
Any suggestions about the back up ? I wonder if the old stuff is still relevant. If we're sure all current text has been migrated to Zanata (and is backed up :-) why would we need a backup of Transifex?
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
Hello Robert,
As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 UTC), we discussed this issue.
During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to Transifex statistics data is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, Mitaka.
ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current release, so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active in Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka, there's no need to query transifex IMO.
Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed,
See https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstack-summi... with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was cut-off-date), Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On 12/16/2015 02:57 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
Hello Robert,
As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting (Dec 03 2015 +6 UTC), we discussed this issue.
During the meeting, meeting attendees found that querying to Transifex statistics data is needed to check ATC status for the next OpenStack release, Mitaka.
ATC status is handed out only for people active in the current release, so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that were active in Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of Mitaka, there's no need to query transifex IMO.
Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has changed,
See https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstack-summi... with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was cut-off-date),
Sorry, let me clarify this again: * ATC is one year (voting rights for i18n) * Free passes for OpenStack conference is 6 months For ATC, you could take a one time snapshot as well now - going back to 1st of April, instead of saving it for later, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
participants (4)
-
Andreas Jaeger
-
Ian Y. Choi
-
Robert Simai
-
Ying Chun Guo