Survey for Zanata platform
Hi guys, As part of our plan to improve Zanata translation platform, it is important for us to constantly collect feedback from users to understand problems and needs. It would be appreciated if you guys can spent few minutes to complete the survey https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lcbmbJ1snljrd5t_ nRyGgDTH7SRWpp6PBKJaq7UiQkM PS. The survey will be closed on 6/MAY. <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lcbmbJ1snljrd5t_nRyGgDTH7SRWpp6PBKJaq7UiQkM> Regards, -- ALEX ENG SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER, TEam lead Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd <https://www.redhat.com/> Level 1, 193 North Quay Brisbane 4000 aeng@redhat.com M: +61423353457 IM: aeng <https://red.ht/sig>
Guys, Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Alex Eng <aeng@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
As part of our plan to improve Zanata translation platform, it is important for us to constantly collect feedback from users to understand problems and needs.
It would be appreciated if you guys can spent few minutes to complete the survey
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lcbmbJ1snljrd5t_nRyGgDTH7S RWpp6PBKJaq7UiQkM
PS. The survey will be closed on 6/MAY.
<https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lcbmbJ1snljrd5t_nRyGgDTH7SRWpp6PBKJaq7UiQkM> Regards,
--
ALEX ENG
SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER, TEam lead
Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd <https://www.redhat.com/>
Level 1, 193 North Quay
Brisbane 4000
aeng@redhat.com M: +61423353457 IM: aeng <https://red.ht/sig>
-- ALEX ENG SENIOR SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd <https://www.redhat.com/> Level 1, 193 North Quay Brisbane 4000 aeng@redhat.com M: +61423353457 IM: aeng <https://red.ht/sig>
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ... -- Thanks, Robert
On 20 April 2017 at 16:15, Robert Simai <robert.simai@suse.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...
That is general strategy of designing survey. Since many time users spam survey by just giving 7 to all. This way, it is insured that user has read and then completed survey :) - Pravin
Hello Pravin, Wow - I have seen such strategy for the 1st time and also thought something similar with Robert. But now I quite agree that it will prevent from unintentional spams. Hello Alex, I have shared the survey to openstack-dev and openstack-docs mailing lists :) - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115736.html - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2017-April/009939.html Of course, I will answer the survey soon :) With many thanks, /Ian pravin.d.s@gmail.com wrote on 4/20/2017 7:51 PM:
On 20 April 2017 at 16:15, Robert Simai <robert.simai@suse.com <mailto:robert.simai@suse.com>> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
> Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey: > > https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz> > T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...
That is general strategy of designing survey. Since many time users spam survey by just giving 7 to all.
This way, it is insured that user has read and then completed survey :)
- Pravin
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Done with the survey. It's a little bit annoy for so many selections, haha:) On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:26 PM Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Pravin,
Wow - I have seen such strategy for the 1st time and also thought something similar with Robert. But now I quite agree that it will prevent from unintentional spams.
Hello Alex,
I have shared the survey to openstack-dev and openstack-docs mailing lists :) - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115736.html - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2017-April/009939.html
Of course, I will answer the survey soon :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
pravin.d.s@gmail.com wrote on 4/20/2017 7:51 PM:
On 20 April 2017 at 16:15, Robert Simai <robert.simai@suse.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...
That is general strategy of designing survey. Since many time users spam survey by just giving 7 to all.
This way, it is insured that user has read and then completed survey :)
- Pravin
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing listOpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- --------------------------------------------- 周正喜 Mobile: 13701280947 WeChat: 472174291
Hi Robert, It was intentional. :) On 20 Apr. 2017 20:46, "Robert Simai" <robert.simai@suse.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:
Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link
Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...
-- Thanks, Robert
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
participants (6)
-
Alex Eng
-
Alex Eng
-
Ian Y. Choi
-
pravin.d.s＠gmail.com
-
Robert Simai
-
Will Zhou