Hi, team We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release. Please let us know your opinion. ------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon ) a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________ 2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. ) a> Yes b> No Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
Hi, On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
I will say again either all languages whichever percentage they got completed or 100% translated. But, my vote goes to d.
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Older versions of translations if in the past had become part of any release should be kept.
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi, Question about the second question: are those translations imported into Transifex? If so, answer to question 1 pretty much decides. If not IMHO they should be imported and go under question 1 rules. The second question is only valid (IMO of course) if there's no language coordinator... Regards, -- DeeJay1 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi, 1. B. 90% translated. 2. A. But 100% translated. If Long term support version, All keep. :) Thanks, Sungjin Gang Sep 25, 2013, 6:03 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> 작성:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi Daisy, 1. Which importing policy do you choose? e> 100% translated, or language coordinator decided (maybe not 100%) 2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? If no language coodinator b> No, Else language coordinator decided Thanks, -- KATO Tomoyuki
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
Hi all, I am with Sungjin with this one: 1. B only if 90% translated is possible, otherwise A 2. A yes Working hard to get the Spanish rolling! Marian On 25 September 2013 12:04, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo@dream.daynight.jp> wrote:
Hi Daisy,
1. Which importing policy do you choose?
e> 100% translated, or language coordinator decided (maybe not 100%)
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon?
If no language coodinator b> No, Else language coordinator decided
Thanks, -- KATO Tomoyuki
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Marian
Hi Team, Same as Kato. 1. e> 100% translated, or language coordinator decided (maybe not 100%) 2. If no language coordinator b> No, else language coordinator decided Best Regards, Gabriel Wainer. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Marian Tort <marian.tort@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I am with Sungjin with this one: 1. B only if 90% translated is possible, otherwise A
2. A yes
Working hard to get the Spanish rolling!
Marian
On 25 September 2013 12:04, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo@dream.daynight.jp> wrote:
Hi Daisy,
1. Which importing policy do you choose?
e> 100% translated, or language coordinator decided (maybe not 100%)
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon?
If no language coodinator b> No, Else language coordinator decided
Thanks, -- KATO Tomoyuki
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Marian
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi again, So my answers are: 1. c) 2. a) if no coordinator, else see 1. -- DeeJay1 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi, Some people here suggested 90%. I want to know what difference does it make if a translation is 85% completed and not got included? The Language co-ordinator works hard to get the required translations gets completed. Why we want to ignore their efforts? I see "language co-ordinator decided" is also good option if many people here prefers that. Thanks, Parag.
I think the Horizon needd to be as clean as possible. 1. a), but if around 95-100%, coordinator decided. 2. b). Regards, Marcelo Dieder On 09/25/2013 06:03 AM, Ying Chun Guo wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
1. Language coordinator decided Why: - Some uncompleted translations are more useful in combination with English fallback than others. - A strict percentage *always* leads to discussion. Why 90% and not 85% or 95%? And what if it's 90% and we are at 88%? I recommend having a coordinator that makes an educated judgment and give that person a guideline (e.g. aim for 90%) - Languages with a lot of contributing translators can have a high "translated" and low "reviewed" percentage.This means it could be of poor quality or very inconsistent. I think it's better to force users to use the product in a secondary language that is consistent than their primary language which is inconsistent. An inconsistent Horizon interface can have substantial negative effects on user satisfaction and you only get one chance for a first impression. Again, the coordinator is best suited to judge quality. 2. No Set and announce a date in the near future (e.g. 3 months or so) for removal which allows translators to copy/paste the useful stuff. I expect there is a high correlation per language in completion of old and new translations. No need to keep the old stuff for languages that have already completed the new translation and no use in keeping an old translation that's no where near complete. 2013/9/25 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com>
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Hi, Thanks for leading the vote.
1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
100% translated or coordinator decided (or active translator if no coordinator)
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
"Yes" in general, but **NO** for Havana. This is from the technical reason. During Grizzly translations, several number of fuzzy strings in the source lang is uploaded to Transifex and as a result Transifex was confused and produced wrong translations. I found several number of wrong translations in Japanese (over 20 or 30 strings) when I imported translations for Grizzly point release (2013.1.1 or .2). Regards, Akihiro On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Akihiro MOTOKI <amotoki@gmail.com>
Hi 1a I think 100 %translated should be our goal 2 No Regards Stephane 2013/9/25 Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@gmail.com>
Hi,
Thanks for leading the vote.
1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
100% translated or coordinator decided (or active translator if no coordinator)
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
"Yes" in general, but **NO** for Havana.
This is from the technical reason. During Grizzly translations, several number of fuzzy strings in the source lang is uploaded to Transifex and as a result Transifex was confused and produced wrong translations. I found several number of wrong translations in Japanese (over 20 or 30 strings) when I imported translations for Grizzly point release (2013.1.1 or .2).
Regards, Akihiro
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Akihiro MOTOKI <amotoki@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Stéphane EVEILLARD Responsable Système et Développement IBS NETWORK Coordinateur Version Française Openstack
Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@gmail.com> wrote on 2013/09/25 17:16:49:
Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@gmail.com> 2013/09/25 17:16
To
Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN,
cc
openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org
Subject
Re: [Openstack-i18n] Call for vote: translation importing policy
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote: Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
I will say again either all languages whichever percentage they got completed or 100% translated. But, my vote goes to d.
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No Older versions of translations if in the past had become part of any release should be kept.
The old version were be kept in the old release. Is it needed to keep them in the new release? Commonly speaking, the old version were pulled from Transifex in the past. But I don't know if there is a very little possibility that there may be some translations in Github but not in Transifex.
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
Commonly speaking, the old translations in Transifex Git repository were pulled from Transifex in the past. But I don't know if there is a very little possibility that there may be some translations in Github but not in Transifex. Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Łukasz Jernaś <deejay1@srem.org> wrote on 2013/09/25 17:20:39:
Łukasz Jernaś <deejay1@srem.org> 2013/09/25 17:20
To
Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN,
cc
"openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org>
Subject
Re: [Openstack-i18n] Call for vote: translation importing policy
Hi, Question about the second question: are those translations imported into Transifex? If so, answer to question 1 pretty much decides. If not IMHO they should be imported and go under question 1 rules. The second question is only valid (IMO of course) if there's no language coordinator...
Regards, -- DeeJay1
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
My opinion: 1. c> language coordinator decided 2. b-No if there is such a technical reason as Akihiro mentioned. I think in the future we should keep Github and Transifex synchronized. Github and transifex can help to save the old translations. Github has the ability to keep old versions. Transifex can save the old translations in Translation memory. Thus we don't need to worry about the possibilities to lost the old translations. Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@gmail.com> wrote on 2013/09/26 00:09:53:
Akihiro Motoki <amotoki@gmail.com> 2013/09/26 00:09
To
Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN,
cc
"openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org>
Subject
Re: [Openstack-i18n] Call for vote: translation importing policy
Hi,
Thanks for leading the vote.
1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
100% translated or coordinator decided (or active translator if no coordinator)
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
"Yes" in general, but **NO** for Havana.
This is from the technical reason. During Grizzly translations, several number of fuzzy strings in the source lang is uploaded to Transifex and as a result Transifex was confused and produced wrong translations. I found several number of wrong translations in Japanese (over 20 or 30 strings) when I imported translations for Grizzly point release (2013.1.1 or .2).
Regards, Akihiro
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
Hi, team
We are just before the translation importing, and we haven't gotten a consensus to the importing policy. Let's do a vote then. The vote will be opened for 24 hours. I only open this vote to i18n mail list yet. But I will publish the vote results to public mail list and ask for comments. The result of this vote will be used for Havanna RC1. If we got strong opposition from the public mail list, we still have chance to change it in Havanna RC2 and Havanna offical release.
Please let us know your opinion.
------------------------------------------------- 1. Which importing policy do you choose? (the policy to be used to import translations from Transifex to Horizon )
a> 100% translated b> 50% translated, ( or you can specify another percentage number ) c> language coordinator decided d> All languages in Transifex e> others ____________
2. Whether to keep the old translations in Horizon? (There are some old translation po/mo files in Horizon. They are old version. Most of them are not completed. )
a> Yes b> No
Regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
-- Akihiro MOTOKI <amotoki@gmail.com>
participants (11)
-
Akihiro Motoki
-
Gabriel Wainer
-
KATO Tomoyuki
-
Marcelo Dieder
-
Marian Tort
-
Parag N(पराग़)
-
Stephane EVEILLARD
-
Sungjin Gang
-
Tom Verdaat
-
Ying Chun Guo
-
Łukasz Jernaś