Re: [OpenStack-I18n] stackalytics translation stats API is broken????
Hello Remo! Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :) [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html With many thanks, /Ian Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote: I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics stats.
I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate different results.
For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, but the send API generates 29490 for the same period.
I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project API be different? Hi all,
Previously Stackalytics uses API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope someone to help.
Stackalytics will get the results every week. And 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the change is possible. What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
!DSPAM:5738aa786031686312732!
Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated. What needs to be done to have this fixed? Remo
On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Remo!
Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html> [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html>
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote: I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics stats.
I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate different results.
For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, but the send API generates 29490 for the same period.
I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project API be different? Hi all,
Previously Stackalytics uses API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope someone to help.
Stackalytics will get the results every week. And 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the change is possible. What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n>
!DSPAM:5738b8456031016916443!
Hello, On 5/16/16 4:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated. What needs to be done to have this fixed? What are your launchpad and Zanata ID? If they are different, Stackalytics will not find your translation counts.
I am asking because your translated words are zero on Stackalytics, which may be different from Akihiro-san and Kato-san's case because their counts are not zero. If you are in the case I mentioned, then you need to add your user data into detault_data.json in the Stackalytics repository, similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284638/1/etc/default_data.json . Fortunately(?), my launchpad, gerrit and Zanata IDs are all the same, so I do not need to add my date on this file :) With many thanks, /Ian
Remo
On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Remo!
Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
[1]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html [2]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote: I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics stats.
I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate different results.
For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, but the send API generates 29490 for the same period.
I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project API be different? Hi all,
Previously Stackalytics uses API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope someone to help.
Stackalytics will get the results every week. And 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the change is possible. What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
!DSPAM:5738b8456031016916443!
my id is the same on launchpad and zanate which is Remo@rm.ht This should be also usable on OpenStack. Any other suggestions
On May 16, 2016, at 04:02, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 5/16/16 4:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated. What needs to be done to have this fixed? What are your launchpad and Zanata ID? If they are different, Stackalytics will not find your translation counts.
I am asking because your translated words are zero on Stackalytics, which may be different from Akihiro-san and Kato-san's case because their counts are not zero.
If you are in the case I mentioned, then you need to add your user data into detault_data.json in the Stackalytics repository, similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284638/1/etc/default_data.json .
Fortunately(?), my launchpad, gerrit and Zanata IDs are all the same, so I do not need to add my date on this file :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo
On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Remo!
Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
[1]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html [2]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote: > I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics > stats. > > I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' > and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate > different results. > > For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, > but the send API generates 29490 for the same period. > > I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. > Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project > API be different? Hi all,
Previously Stackalytics uses API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope someone to help.
Stackalytics will get the results every week. And 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the change is possible. What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
!DSPAM:5739a7fa6035783461134!
Ian, as you can see Launchpad Id: remo-o Email: Remo@rm.ht Thanks
On May 16, 2016, at 12:01, Remo Mattei <remo@rm.ht> wrote:
my id is the same on launchpad and zanate
which is Remo@rm.ht <mailto:Remo@rm.ht>
This should be also usable on OpenStack.
Any other suggestions
On May 16, 2016, at 04:02, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 5/16/16 4:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated. What needs to be done to have this fixed? What are your launchpad and Zanata ID? If they are different, Stackalytics will not find your translation counts.
I am asking because your translated words are zero on Stackalytics, which may be different from Akihiro-san and Kato-san's case because their counts are not zero.
If you are in the case I mentioned, then you need to add your user data into detault_data.json in the Stackalytics repository, similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284638/1/etc/default_data.json .
Fortunately(?), my launchpad, gerrit and Zanata IDs are all the same, so I do not need to add my date on this file :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo
On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Remo!
Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
[1]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html [2]http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM: >> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com <mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com>> wrote: >> I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics >> stats. >> >> I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' >> and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate >> different results. >> >> For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, >> but the send API generates 29490 for the same period. >> >> I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. >> Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project >> API be different? > Hi all, > > Previously Stackalytics uses API > 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. > But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/ > > I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope > someone to help. > > Stackalytics will get the results every week. And > 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return > everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work. > > To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses > Zanata's API. Based on > 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the > 'savedDate' to display > on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the > change is possible. > What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently. > > But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n>
!DSPAM:573a19236031948371752!
I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate different results.
There's a slight difference between "stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and ' stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' as Patrick explained. To sync with what shown in the user profile page in Zanata, 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' is use for Stackalytics. To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's
API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics.
Yes. Zanata does returns daily statistics based on search query(last parameter in the api request). Depending on how you want to show in Stackalytics, you can just manipulate the results to daily, weekly. --------------------------------------------- Alex Eng Senior Software Engineer Globalisation Tools Engineering DID: +61 3514 8262 <callto:+61+3514+8262> Mobile: +614 2335 3457 <callto:+614+2335+3457> Red Hat, Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd Level 1, 193 North Quay Brisbane 4000 Office: +61 7 3514 8100 <callto:+61+7+3514+8100> Fax: +61 7 3514 8199 <callto:+61+7+3514+8199> Website: www.redhat.com On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Remo Mattei <remo@rm.ht> wrote:
Ian, as you can see
Launchpad Id:remo-oEmail: Remo@rm.ht
Thanks
On May 16, 2016, at 12:01, Remo Mattei <remo@rm.ht> wrote:
my id is the same on launchpad and zanate
which is Remo@rm.ht
This should be also usable on OpenStack.
Any other suggestions
On May 16, 2016, at 04:02, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 5/16/16 4:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Well I just checked and no there are no diff on this list but I still do not have any words translated. What needs to be done to have this fixed?
What are your launchpad and Zanata ID? If they are different, Stackalytics will not find your translation counts.
I am asking because your translated words are zero on Stackalytics, which may be different from Akihiro-san and Kato-san's case because their counts are not zero.
If you are in the case I mentioned, then you need to add your user data into detault_data.json in the Stackalytics repository, similar to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/284638/1/etc/default_data.json .
Fortunately(?), my launchpad, gerrit and Zanata IDs are all the same, so I do not need to add my date on this file :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo
On May 15, 2016, at 10:55, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com < mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Hello Remo!
Your translation count on Stackalytics is zero? If then, I think [1] and [2] will help to solve your problem :)
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087537.html [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/087659.html
With many thanks,
/Ian
Remo Mattei wrote on 5/16/2016 2:22 AM:
The last 2 months I translated about 400 words but stack does not even show any. It will be great to get this fixed.
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 15 mag 2016, alle ore 09:56, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com < mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>>> ha scritto:
Hello,
I might have found the problem.
The problem is that there can be several 'Translated' results within a week, however, those results are saved with the same primary key.
I have just proposed https://review.openstack.org/316460 .
I am not sure whether 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, but at least, generating the primary key for translation records on record_processor.py does not use 'savedDate' field, as Shengjing mentioned. If 'date' field is used on other Stackalytics sources, please tell me, then I will change the review :)
With many thanks,
/Ian
SJ Zhu wrote on 5/16/2016 12:14 AM:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Ian Y. Choi <ianyrchoi@gmail.com < mailto:ianyrchoi@gmail.com <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>>> wrote: I have a question, although it is not mainly related to wrong Stackalytics stats.
I have found that API 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' and API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s' generate different results.
For example, from Apr 1 2016 to today, my count is 34320 with the first API, but the send API generates 29490 for the same period.
I do know why the two APIs generate different numbers. Can statistics numbers on user API and the sum of results from each project API be different?
Hi all,
Previously Stackalytics uses API 'stats/project/%s/version/%s/contributor/%s/%s..%s'. But I change it to 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288871/
I may find the BUG but I have no time to fix it these days. So I hope someone to help.
Stackalytics will get the results every week. And 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' will return everyday's count. However Stackalytics seems not to sum a week's work.
To fix it, I think we can change the way how Stackalytics uses Zanata's API. Based on 'stats/user/%s/%s..%s' we can get 'savedDate'. So just use the 'savedDate' to display on Stackalytics. I haven't read the code carefully but I think the change is possible. What's more we can debug the wrong results on Stackalytics more conveniently.
But there's another question. How can we fix the old results on Stackalytics?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org < mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org < mailto:OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org <OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
!DSPAM:573a19236031948371752!
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-I18n mailing list OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
participants (3)
-
Alex Eng
-
Ian Y. Choi
-
Remo Mattei