9 Apr
2015
9 Apr
'15
12:22 p.m.
On 09/04/15 15:19, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 04/09/2015 09:03 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
At a quick glance, I think the rst2pot tool probably needs some work to reduce the amount of markup that comes through.
One low-hanging-fruit would be strings like:
**Determine which flavor to use for your database**
**Restore using incremental backups**
We use upstream Sphinx tools here and nothing self-written, changes for that tool might impact other projects using it.
Simply: the lack of ability to make a simple modification like this is a significant regression from the existing documentation toolchain that needs to be fixed. Regards, Tom