Hello Andreas,
I am copying & pasting from Andreas's comment to this thread:
+++
"Sorry, let me clarify this again:
* ATC is one year (voting rights for i18n)
* Free passes for OpenStack conference is 6 months
For ATC, you could take a one time snapshot as well now - going
back to 1st of April, instead of saving it for later,"
=> Thank you so much for your nice clarification on ATC status
and summit free passes.
We would vote this issue (removing on Transifex site) on today's
IRC meeting, and yes.
We need contribution statistics data from Transifex, and I agree
that
we can query and save Transifex statistics data (from April 1 2015
to now) and later
we would merge this data with Zanata statistics data on next
April.
And I am not sure exactly, but we might use openstack/i18n repo to
store Transfex related data
into a specific branch, not a master branch.
With many thanks,
/Ian
Ying Chun Guo wrote on 12/17/2015 1:21 AM:
If we don't need the contribution data in Transifex, I
think we could remove it.
As to the back up, it's a personal habit. I just want to
keep it as the history.
I will use a repo in github to store the documents,
including an Excel file with the contribution statistic data.
Best regards
Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
-----Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote: -----
>To: "Ian Y. Choi" <ianyrchoi@gmail.com>,
Robert Simai
><robert.simai@suse.com>
>From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com>
>Date: 12/16/2015 09:59PM
>Cc: openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Transifex
>
>On 2015-12-16 14:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> On 2015-12-16 14:34, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
>>> Hello Robert,
>>>
>>> As far as I remember, on the last i18n irc meeting
(Dec 03 2015 +6
>UTC),
>>> we discussed this issue.
>>>
>>> During the meeting, meeting attendees found that
querying to
>Transifex
>>> statistics data
>>> is needed to check ATC status for the next
OpenStack release,
>Mitaka.
>>
>> ATC status is handed out only for people active in the
current
>release,
>> so for the next summit in Austin, only for people that
were active
>in
>> Mitaka time frame. And since we used Zanata for all of
Mitaka,
>there's
>> no need to query transifex IMO.
>>
>> Katamo is wrong with ATC status for one year, this has
changed,
>
>See
>https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/45531/atc-pass-for-the-openstac
>k-summit/
>with information for Tokyo summit (1st of April was
cut-off-date),
>
>Andreas
>--
> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org}
Twitter: jaegerandi
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C
C272
>A126
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openstack-i18n mailing list
>Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
>