Hello Pravin,

Wow - I have seen such strategy for the 1st time and also thought something similar with Robert.
But now I quite agree that it will prevent from unintentional spams.


Hello Alex,

I have shared the survey to openstack-dev and openstack-docs mailing lists :)
- http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115736.html
- http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/2017-April/009939.html


Of course, I will answer the survey soon :)


With many thanks,

/Ian

pravin.d.s@gmail.com wrote on 4/20/2017 7:51 PM:


On 20 April 2017 at 16:15, Robert Simai <robert.simai@suse.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017, 12:43:33 CEST, Alex Eng wrote:

> Sorry for this, but the updated link for the survey:
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeqxia866yOv1GZEmCqCenz
> T31RO6gzndJ1w7QetRr6NvGvfQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

Just an observation from my side, not sure if that was intentional. The rating
from 1-7 is not consistent so that "1" may mean "very bad" for one question
and "very good" for another. That's a bit confusing ...

That is general strategy of designing survey. Since many time users spam survey by just giving 7 to all.

This way, it is insured that user has read and then completed survey :)

-
Pravin


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-I18n mailing list
OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n