Hello, all

Till now, I got responses from 5 translators in Japanese, Korean, Spanish, French and Chinese translation team.
4 of them clearly described their preferences is Zanata.

Here are some comments from them to support Zanata:

• "Using Zanata, cooperation with other translators is easier: chat room, listing translators who are translating at the same time, comments if a translation is rejected."
• "The role management of Zanata is powerful. It clearly defines translators, reviewers, and project maintainers."
• "I like the Project-wide search and replace feature in particular. It allows translators or maintainer to search for a word, a phrase, a sentence, or a paragraph and replace it across multiple files within a single project. It is extremely useful when you do the final editing or reviewing."
• "I guess the impression a translator can have is that Zanata is more user friendly, whilst Pootle looks a bit quirky makinf finding info or the right links a bir more difficult. I think Zanata is very easy to use and also promote s translator engagement."

• The support of CJK (Chinese font, Japanese font and Korean font) is poor, for example: saved translations in Korean font is ???;  saved translations in CJK fonts do not seem to be recognized by the TM.
• No official client till now. Our current translation process (uploading, downloading and reviewing) could not be implemented.