On 06/17/2015 05:40 PM, Ying Chun Guo wrote:
Hi, Lyz
In my mind, "active members" here are especially useful when distributing free registration codes for the summit. As a code/document developer, 1 patch may be deserved for a free code. As a translator, translating or reviewing a certain number of words may be deserved for that.
"Core members" just like the leading/core team of I18n team. "Core members" are especially useful when we need to vote for something, just like code/doc developers vote for a patch. I don't have specific situations in mind when we need a vote, but sometime there would be a need for the vote.
The infrastructure team member do enough to get a free ATC, this shouldn't be a problem for Lyz or others. What I take from this discussion is that you need to experiment. Start with an initial set of rules and change them when we learn more. We'll all figure things out. And I expect that even if Lyz or myself would not be cores, you would still ask for our feedback in some areas and consider it.
Of course, I hope the infrastructure could support these requirements. But it may need time to figure out how to get the list of active members or how to vote for a decision in I18n team. Your suggestions ?
With Zanata up, we should be able to get some list of contributors, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126