+1 Read only .... 2016-02-24 18:37 GMT+09:00 Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc@cn.ibm.com>:
Support to continue open openstack-manuals. I still have translation bugs pending to fix. Don't close it.
Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
"Kato, Tomoyuki" <kato.tomoyuki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote on 2016/02/24 17:22:43:
From: "Kato, Tomoyuki" <kato.tomoyuki@jp.fujitsu.com> To: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> Cc: "openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org" < openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org> Date: 2016/02/24 17:24 Subject: RE: [Openstack-i18n] Closing Liberty translations?
+1 to read-only.
Is this all resources? program components only? documentation?
I think install guides for Liberty is still useful, and should translate for many languages as possible. Therefore, I'd like to open openstack-manuals.
Regards, KATO Tomoyuki
-----Original Message----- If we delete them, translation memory and translators contribution statistic data will be affected. So I don't support deleting. I think we mark them as read only.
If no objections, we can do it by the end of this week.
Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote on 2016/02/24 16:16:37:
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> To: "openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org" <openstack- i18n@lists.openstack.org> Date: 2016/02/24 16:18 Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Closing Liberty translations?
Since Mitaka translations start next week, I propose we close the Liberty translations now as discussed last autumn.
How should we do this?
Is there a need to keep the liberty branches for some time as
read-only?
Or should we delete them directly?
Andreas
_______________________________________________ Openstack-i18n mailing list Openstack-i18n@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n