On 09/19/2016 06:15 PM, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
Hello,
Actually I do not know exactly how I see a list of stable/newton versions in Zanata. (Should I click all the projects and check corresponding versions currently?)
Yes, that's the only way ;(
But yes, there are also many server-side projects, such as nova and neutron.
Exactly - and for those I've setup the sync.
Job to sync translated projects:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365872/
Please review - and if I missed some repos, create a new change, I noticed that more projects have stable-newton branches in Zanata then
On 2016-09-16 17:45, Andreas Jaeger wrote: those that I added - and thus far more than are mentioned on the front page.
Do you really want to allow translation of all of these - or focus like it's written on the Zanata front page and as Ian states in "To language team coordinators: Let's speed up for Newton translation" on a few Horizon projects?
I suggest to focus and remove stable-newton branch from those projects you're not handling.
Should that list be the list of repos I enabled in infra? Or only the dashboard ones?
So, basically, what I'd like to know: * Which projects should have stable-newton in Zanata? That is why I intended first to check whether there will be more IBM
Andreas Jaeger wrote on 9/19/2016 9:07 PM: translations or not, since IBM contributed translations on server-side projects a lot.
As http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073942.htm... shared about one year ago, and at Austin I18n meetup, server-side projects were not included in our priority. ( Austin I18n meetup Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/austin-i18n-meetup )
Those were done in the past and if you change it, you should tell the server side projects and release team. They might expect it. Personally, I would focus on user side content: Dashboards, openstackclient, documentation - and then comes server side projects - but your call. I just ask for proper communication.
Non-prioritizing would mean non-consideration of stable/newton branches for server projects in Zanata?
You could leave them in case somebody wants to translate them - or remove them completely.
I do not clearly remember it, but if it is okay, currently I am okay to remove those projects which are not handled.
But still, I would like to know to IBM's translation contribution plan, and also listen to language coordinators and translators by this mailing list or later I18n IRC meeting.
IBM translated some server projects.
For documentation projects (e.g., openstack-manuals), creating stable versions after release data is needed.
Yes, indeed. openstack-manuals has not branched yet.
* Which should be synced to git (IMHO the same ones)? IMO same as the 1st * Do you want to point out further repos besides the dashboard ones? If yes, how? I think current decision for Newton is up to Kato-san, since he is now Newton PTL :) Kato-san, do you have idea on that?
And of course, I really want to point out documentation projects for stable/newton branch after the release date during Ocata cycle.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126