>
> --
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 8 March 2017, 15:59:01 CET, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>> Hi I18n team,
>>
>> Do we want to move this forward or abandon it?
>>
>> When I sent the original mail last October, we mainly discussed the
>> threshold values themselves and the approach itself was not discussed
>> well. Most feedbacks I received are positive though.
>>
>> I would like to know we agree the original idea "to publish release
>> notes translation based on per release progress" or not.
>>
>> I kept my patch implementing this idea for a long time [1]. If there
>> is no agreement, I will abandon it.
>>
>> [1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383622/
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Akihiro
>>
>> 2016-10-08 18:55 GMT+09:00 Akihiro Motoki <
amotoki@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi i18n team,
>> > CC: Doug from the release team.
>> >
>> > We are now preparing translated version of release notes.
>> > I would like to discuss the import criteria of release notes translation.
>> > If there is a better way, it would be great.
>> >
>> > == Problem ==
>> >
>> > Release notes translation is imported when 75% of a PO file is translated.
>> > 75% is calculated as a whole.
>> >
>> > If a language team wants to translate release notes of a specific release,
>> > the team needs to translate release notes of other releases.
>> > This comes from the fact that the translation percentage is calculated as
>> > a
>> > whole.
>> >
>> > The development teams started to use reno for translation at the beginning
>> > of Mitaka cycle
>> > and Liberty release notes are converted into reno-based release notes.
>> > This mean if we want to publish Newton release notes translation, we need
>> > to translate
>> > release notes for Liberty and Mitaka at the same time.
>> >
>> > == Proposal ==
>> >
>> > I hope we can publish translated release notes per release.
>> > If Newton release notes translation completes, I want to publish Newton
>> > release notes.
>> > My proposal is to change the import criteria for release notes translation
>> > to 75% at least for a specific release.
>> >
>> > If translation progress of release notes are less than 40% for all
>> > releases, a corresponding PO file will be removed from the repo.
>> >
>> > I proposed an infra scirpt change to implement the above.
>> >
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383622/
>> > Proposed threshold 75% and 40% might need to be revisited.
>> >
>> > == Open question ==
>> >
>> > Do we publish translated release notes for a release with <75% progress?
>> > This is about publishing rendered release notes.
>> >
>> > For example, assume my lang team have translated release notes
>> > 90% for Newton, 10% for Mitaka and Liberty. In this case, which is better
>> > not to publish Mitaka and Liberty release notes translation or to publish
>> > all?
>> >
>> > My vote is not to publish less-translated version of release notes.
>> >
>> > == Note ==
>> >
>> > Question from Ian on the gerrit review.
>> > By the way, is it possible to see only Newton release note strings in
>> > Zanata?
>> > Answer: The current Zanata version we use does not support filtering by an
>> > original filename.
>> > You need to check English release notes like [1] or [2] and search strings
>> > on Zanata.
>> > [1]
https://releases.openstack.org/newton/index.html
>> > [2]
http://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/horizon/
>> >
>> > Akihiro
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-I18n mailing list
>>
OpenStack-I18n@lists.openstack.org
>>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n
>
>