On 2015-11-25 15:48, KATO Tomoyuki wrote:
On 25 Nov 2015, at 03:41, KATO Tomoyuki <tomo@dream.daynight.jp> wrote:
My idea at now is to use "code-block" directive as possible as we can,
As far as I know, docs team guides mainly use "code-block". So, I'm okay to unify to "code-block" directive.
but I am not sure it is the right direction as "::" is widely used.
In my understand, most of developers like “::”, which is simple RST format :)
Maybe we could add a gate check that looks for “::” in the end of the strings (original and translated)? It would enable developers to use whatever they are used to.
Nice idea! Sounds good to me, as a non-vote job.
Regards, KATO Tomoyuki
But who will monitor this and correct it? We already see warnings in translated code that everybody ignores, let's find a good way to monitor and fix these problems first before we add more tests... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126