September 2015 - OpenStack-I18n - lists.openstack.org

I18n sessions plan in Tokyo summit
by Ying Chun Guo 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

Hello, team I plan to have two I18n working sessions and a half day I18n contributors meet up in Tokyo summit. Here are the descriptions of the two working sessions. Working session #1. Time: 4:40pm - 5:20pm on Oct. 27, Tuesday Title: Review of the tool support in Liberty translations Abstract: We just moved to the new translation tool in Liberty. In this session, we will review how Liberty translation went with Zanata. We will collect issues/problems we met in Liberty translation, talk about how to improve in the future, and figure out the next steps. The agenda will be tracked here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tokyo-translation-tool-support Working session #2. Time: 5:30pm - 6:10pm on Oct. 27, Tuesday Title: How translation schedule fits the development schedule? Abstract: In Liberty, we redefined the string freeze, split into soft string freeze and hard string freeze. In this session, we will collect the feedback to translation schedule from both translators and developers, refine the definition of string freeze, and figure out a better translation schedule for next release. The agenda will be tracked here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tokyo-translation-schedule The time of i18n meet up is not decided yet. It's a kind of round table, and doesn't have title and abstract. People could join and raise any discussions/questions related with i18n/l10n/translation there. We will use this page to track the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tokyo-i18n-meetup If you have any issues with these sessions, please let me know. Thank you. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

2 2

Re: [Openstack-i18n] [Openstack] OpenStack Kilo Release Note Translation
by Tom Fifield 17 Oct '15

17 Oct '15

Hi, I just clicked "Mark This Page for Translation", which should fix this, I think. """ The page ReleaseNotes/Kilo has been marked up for translation with 166 translation units. The page can now be translated. """ Regards, Tom On 01/05/15 10:40, Ray Sun wrote: > By the way, I found this in mediawiki translation plugin document: > > This page contains changes which are not marked for translation." if you > are not a translation administrator > > Best Regards > -- Ray > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Ray Sun <xiaoquqi(a)gmail.com > <mailto:xiaoquqi@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Stackers, > I try to translate OpenStack Kilo release note, but I don't think I > have permission to do that even if I added translation tag for it. > Any one who have that permission, please help. Thanks. > > Best Regards > -- Ray > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack(a)lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >

4 10

API Quick Start
by Anne Gentle 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

Hi all, I've got a patch in progress to convert the "API Quick Start" from Docbook to RST: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/217467/ Since it has quite a few translations completed, I want to make sure that converting that document is okay with the translators. So, is it okay to convert and build using RST instead of Docbook? Is the tooling available for files in the api-site repository? Thanks, Anne -- Anne Gentle Rackspace Principal Engineer www.justwriteclick.com

3 3

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Ying Chun Guo 01 Oct '15

01 Oct '15

Hi, Doug After testing, I figured out a best way which has the lowest impact. 1. Create Russian translation files with only the correct header and the pluralities translation items. 2. Create a new version named as russian-fix 3. Upload the source files and the Russian translation files created in #1 to the version russian-fix 4. Merge the stable version with version russian-fix 5. Rename stable version to stable-old, and rename russian-fix to stable. You could verify if the issues are fixed in russian-fix ? https://translate.openstack.org/iteration/view/horizon/russian-fix Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 09/24/2015 02:41:16 AM: > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > To: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM@IBMCN > Cc: ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org, openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 09/24/2015 02:41 AM > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > I don't think these kinds of structural edits are available through > the Zanata UI (I'm not expert and welcome any correction) > > I don't have a script to automatically do the updates but I did > outline my plan in the bug description. To repeat here: > cd openstack_dashboard/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES > cp django.po django.po-tmp > grep -v msgstr.2. django.po-tmp > django.po > sed -i s/msgstr.3./msgstr[2]/ django.po > and edit the plurality function to be > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n" > "%10<=4 && (n%100<12 || n%100>14) ? 1 : 2);\n" > was my plan to fix the openstack_dashboard ... django.po file. This > is the only one that results in bad behavior in Horizon today. > > However, since this is such a difficult process I think we should > update all 4 Russian PO file while we are doing this: > openstack_dashboard/horizon and django.po/djangojs.po for each part. > > Daisy - I'm happy to help work through this, including testing out > our proposed files in Horizon. Do you want to schedule a time and > coordinate this through openstack-i18n or some meeting IRC channel? > > Doug > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS@IBMAU > Cc: ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org, openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 11:25 AM > > Thank you for looking into it, Illya. > I think we need to fix it, although the manually process might be a > little complex. > > I'm going to: > 1. Create a new version in Zanata > 2. Mark master as read only > 2. Pull the source files and the translation files. > 3. Change the pluralities settings in Russian translation files. > 4. Upload the source files and translation files to the new version. > 5. Check if the all things are right, change master version name to > "master-old", > and then change the new version name to "master" > > How do you want to update these pluralities then? By program ? Or manually ? > Is it possible to make the changes through Zanata UI, other than > uploading po files ? > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 09/23/2015 04:38:19 AM: > > > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > To: ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org > > Cc: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com, openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 09/23/2015 04:38 AM > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > Thanks for looking at this! Unfortunately having 4 pluralities > > confuses Horizon. I've tested out stripping one of the pluralities > > and restoring the expected Plural-forms definition (just like the > > one you linked) and it works great. > > > > I had hoped to just repair the PO files in this way and upload the > > corrected translations to Zanata. > > > > Unfortunately, I understand from Daisy's research that once a > > language/project has been created in Zanata in this way we cannot > > just upload a PO file with corrected pluralities . More > > investigation will be needed to understand the process to fix this. > > > > Doug > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > From: Ilya Alekseyev <ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org> > > Sent by: ilya(a)phpcoder.ru > > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > Cc: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com>, "openstack- > > i18n(a)lists.openstack.org" <openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2015 2:39 PM > > > > Hi Doug and Daisy! > > > > Looks like we have wrong pluralities in current release: > > in https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/ > > openstack_dashboard/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/django.po > > > > we have: > > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=4; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n" > > "%10<=4 && (n%100<12 || n%100>14) ? 1 : n%10==0 || (n%10>=5 && n% > 10<=9) || (n" > > "%100>=11 && n%100<=14)? 2 : 3);\n" > > > > but in previuos releses we have: > > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n% > > 10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n" > > > > Last one is right for Russian. > > > > We can make translation in Zanata for 4 pluralities, but it can give > > in some cases bugs with wrong plural forms. > > > > Kind regards, > > Ilya Alekseyev. > > > > 2015-09-22 14:22 GMT+03:00 Douglas Fish <drfish(a)us.ibm.com>: > > Hi Daisy, > > > > I am certain this issue is caused by plural forms. The issue with > > missing menus is seen with the current 4 plural form translations; > > when I correct the PO file to have 3 forms Horizon properly > displaysthe menus. > > > > Doug > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > From: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM > > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS@IBMAU > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2015 12:49 AM > > > > Hi, Doug > > > > We need to consider it carefully. > > > > After working with Zanata dev team, I got to understand: > > > > 1. Zanata has its own plural forms. If po file has its own plural > > form, Zanata will use that. > > Otherwise, Zanata will use its own plural form. Pluralforms in Zanata: > > nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && > > (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2). > > So it looks like that OpenStack po files overrode the pluralforms in Zanata. > > > > 2. Zanata currently don't allow update of plural forms once the > > document has been uploaded to Zanata. > > Even with deletion of that source document and re-upload (in the > > same project-version, same doc name and same path), > > Zanata will still reuse the old pluralform. > > > > 3. If we want to update the pluralforms, we will need to do it in > > new project-version > > (don't use copy-from previous version function). > > > > I think we need to carefully design the steps to change pluralforms > > of Russian. > > At first, I want to confirm with you, are you sure this issue is > > caused by plural forms? > > > > Best regards > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > > > > Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 2015/09/18 23:38:22: > > > > > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > > To: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com > > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > Date: 2015/09/18 23:38 > > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > > > Hi Daisy, > > > > > > Yes, I understand - I don't think I can even propose my branch > > > unless I am added as a translator by the Russian team. > > > > > > My proposal would include removing one plural form for > > > 4 messages in horizon django.po > > > 1 message in horizon djangojs.po > > > 144 messages in openstack_dashboard django.po > > > 0 messages in openstack_dashboard djangojs.po > > > plus the pluralization specification would be updated in all 4 files. > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > From: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com> > > > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 3:25 AM > > > > > > Are there a lot of changes in your proposed po files ? > > > I'm still waiting for Russian team's response. > > > > > > Best regards > > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > > > > > > > "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> wrote on 09/18/2015 05:37:07 AM: > > > > > > > From: "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> > > > > To: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > > Date: 09/18/2015 05:38 AM > > > > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > > > > > Hi translation friends, > > > > > > > > I'd like to contribute 4 PO files for the Horizon Russian > > > > translation to correct the issue > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+bug/1494819 > > > > > > > > These uploads won't contain any new translations, but instead will > > > > be an adjustment to the PO files so they have 3 pluralities, which > > > is standard > > > > http://localization-guide.readthedocs.org/en/latest/l10n/ > pluralforms.html > > > > > > > > Specifically, I plan to remove the msgstr[2] translation from the > > > > files (because msgstr[2] is blank for many cases), rename the msgstr > > > > [3] translation to msgstr[2] and adjust the plurality specification to > > > > nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && > > > > (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2); > > > > > > > > As discussed in the team meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/ > > > > meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2015/openstack_i18n_meeting. > > > > 2015-09-17-13.00.log.html > > > > please create a Zanata branch so I can propose these corrections > > for review. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > >

4 3

IRC meeting tomorrow
by Ying Chun Guo 30 Sep '15

30 Sep '15

Hello,team We will have the IRC meeting at UTC 0600 in the channel #openstack-meeting on October 1st. We could talk about the ongoing liberty translations: progress, importing, issues, and etc. If you have other topics, feel free to propose. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

Handling of translations for Liberty
by Andreas Jaeger 30 Sep '15

30 Sep '15

We had some IRC discussion today about how to handle the "other" projects with importing and here's a proposal based on discussions with Clark, Lyz, Steve, Daisy and Thierry. I'd like to prepare everything for this tomorrow if possible, so please speak up if you have questions or concerns, Andreas Challenge: We have translations for some projects like keystone that are not on the liberty branch. Master is already open for Mitaka. Proposal: Handle all projects that have currently translations of main files (so, not only LOG files) and liberty branches the same - like we do with horizon and nova. Details: This means, the following projects will get liberty branches: List of projects that branch with translations: openstack/ceilometer openstack/cinder openstack/designate openstack/designate-dashboard openstack/django_openstack_auth openstack/glance openstack/horizon openstack/keystone openstack/neutron openstack/nova openstack/swift openstack/zaqar List of projects branching later: openstack/openstack-manuals - to translate Install Guide The following projects will not be translated: List of projects that branch without translations in git : openstack/aodh openstack/ironic-inspector openstack/magnum openstack/magnum-ui openstack/manila openstack/sahara openstack/searchlight List of projects that branch with only LOG translations in git: openstack/barbican openstack/glance_store openstack/heat openstack/ironic openstack/trove List of projects not branching: openstack/api-site openstack/ha-guide openstack/operations-guide openstack/oslo.cache openstack/oslo.concurrency openstack/oslo.db openstack/oslo.i18n openstack/oslo.log openstack/oslo.messaging openstack/oslo.middleware openstack/oslo.policy openstack/oslo.reports openstack/oslo.service openstack/oslo.utils openstack/oslo.versionedobjects openstack/oslo.vmware openstack/python-magnumclient openstack/python-openstackclient openstack/security-doc Process 1. Before RC1 is cut, translators work with master version. 2. When stable branch is cut, branches get created in Zanata as well. Syncing will get enabled for them. 3. Translators focus on translation of stable branch. 4. Once translators are finished with translations, a copy of new translations from stable branch to master is done in Zanata . 5. Open master version to accept translations. Note: Around RC1 time, a patch to cleanup "old" translations gets proposed to both stable and master to remove any translations in git that are less than 50 % translated (we normally only delete less than 20 % to avoid to frequent deletion). What do we want to see in Liberty release: * Updated translations of files that are sufficiently translate (> 75 %) * Updated po source file that reflect state of repository * No empty/mainly untranslated language files (< 50 %) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

4 13

dashboard trans checksite
by KATO Tomoyuki 26 Sep '15

26 Sep '15

Hi team, A.I. from last IRC meeting. I updated translation check site spec. Any comments are welcome. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184559/ Thanks, KATO Tomoyuki

2 2

horizon, django_openstack_auth and other stable/liberty created
by Andreas Jaeger 26 Sep '15

26 Sep '15

Hi, translation team, horizon, django_openstack_auth, and other projects as mentioned in my email have now stable/liberty branches created [1]. Daisy and myself have created the corresponding version for liberty in Zanata. The version name is stable-liberty. So from now on, all translations/review should be made in the stable-liberty version. The master version of horizon and django_openstack_auth is now set "Read Only" and will be open to accept translations after Liberty is done. Andreas [1] Horizon is currently get prepared for branch, the git repo is not yet updated but our version will be the branch point -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

1 2

Re: [Openstack-i18n] [openstack-dev] [nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() inpython-novaclient?
by Matt Riedemann 25 Sep '15

25 Sep '15

On 9/6/2015 12:18 AM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > Isn't this just a matter of setting up novaclient for translation? IIRC > using _() is harmless if there's no translation bits set up for the project. > > Thanks, > > Steve Martinelli > OpenStack Keystone Core > > Inactive hide details for Matt Riedemann ---2015/09/04 01:50:54 PM---I > noticed this today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219Matt Riedemann > ---2015/09/04 01:50:54 PM---I noticed this today: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219768/ > > From: Matt Riedemann <mriedem(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev(a)lists.openstack.org>, openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 2015/09/04 01:50 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() in > python-novaclient? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I noticed this today: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219768/ > > And it got me thinking about something I've wondered before - why do we > even use _() in python-novaclient? It doesn't have any .po files for > babel message translation, it has no babel config, there is nothing in > setup.cfg about extracting messages and compiling them into .mo's, there > is nothing on Transifex for python-novaclient, etc. > > Is there a way to change your locale and get translated output in nova > CLIs? I didn't find anything in docs from a quick google search. > > Comparing to python-openstackclient, that does have a babel config and > some locale po files in tree, at least for de and zh_TW. > > So if this doesn't work in python-novaclient, do we need any of the i18n > code in there? It doesn't really hurt, but it seems pointless to push > changes for it or try to keep user-facing messages in mind in the code. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Yeah, doffm is working on enabling i18n for python-novaclient via bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1492444 -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann

5 6

Re: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients
by Ying Chun Guo 25 Sep '15

25 Sep '15

Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM wrote on 2015/09/25 10:17:52: > From: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM > To: Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> > Cc: Matt Riedemann <mriedem(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>, openstack- > i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 2015/09/25 10:17 > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients > > Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> wrote on 2015/09/23 15:06:56: > > > From: Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> > > To: Matt Riedemann <mriedem(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ying Chun Guo/ > China/IBM@IBMCN > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 2015/09/23 15:07 > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients > > > > On 2015-09-22 22:53, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 9/21/2015 10:49 AM, Ying Chun Guo wrote: > > >> Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> wrote on 09/21/2015 10:27:29 PM: > > >> > > >> > From: Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> > > >> > To: Matt Riedemann <mriedem(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>, openstack- > > >> > i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > >> > Date: 09/21/2015 10:28 PM > > >> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] translating python clients > > >> > > > >> > On 2015-09-21 16:09, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 9/18/2015 10:54 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > > >> > >> I have no comment on Liberty translation priority atm. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> I think a couple of different topics are discussed at the same > > >> here. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> * CLI translation priority > > >> > >> * Server side project translation priority > > >> > >> * (potential) usage of server side project translations in Horizon > > >> > >> > > >> > >> We need to have more contact with project teams in the next cycle > > >> > >> more deeply to decide translation priorties before starting > > >> translations. > > >> > >> In the past releases, i18n team tended to start discussions after > > >> > >> starting > > >> > >> translations and it is too late for the game in most cases. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Regarding client projects, I know openstackclient is our future and > > >> > >> the keystone team encourage to use openstackclient for Keystone v3 > > >> API. > > >> > >> However, regarding other projects like nova or neutron, > > >> > >> the progress of openstackclient integration is not well enojgh > > >> > >> and a new feature is implemented in each client. > > >> > >> Thus we need to consider the priority in the next cycle. > > >> > > > > >> > > I agree with this. We are nowhere near, as far as I can tell > > >> anyway, of > > >> > > deprecating python-novaclient. The reason we pushed the changes to > > >> > > translate the project is because people are pushing changes into > > >> > > python-novaclient to mark strings for translation, but there was > > >> never > > >> > > any infrastructure in place to do those translations (the project > > >> wasn't > > >> > > even configured with babel until a couple of weeks ago). > > >> > > > > >> > > So the feeling was, why not translate it? It's easy to setup. I > > >> agree > > >> > > that python-openstackclient is higher priority for the CLI, but > > >> > > python-novaclient is not going away anytime soon, especially now > > >> that we > > >> > > have microversion support in it for the compute API, which I don't > > >> think > > >> > > python-openstackclient has. > > >> > > > >> > But just the setup will not give you translations for free. Even if we > > >> > set it up, I fear no one will translate it. Therefore I wonder whether > > >> > it makes sense at all to enable the infrastructure if no translator > > >> > looks at it. > > >> > > > >> > Or in other words: Does the translation team want to have every > > >> possible > > >> > project in Zanata? Or only those they want to translate? And then the > > >> > question is which ones to translate? > > >> > > >> In my mind, translation platform should not block any people who want to > > >> translate > > >> any resources if the resources are available in Openstack community. > > >> So if dev team want to put their resources, put them there. > > > > > > This is my thinking as well. If the infrastructure is not in place, > > > people are definitely not going to translate it. I understand that > > > people might not translate it anyway, but I don't see the harm in having > > > it available for translation if someone wants that. And as pointed out > > > somewhere else on this topic, python-openstackclient and Horizon both > > > use python-novaclient, so unless those are completely handling all > > > errors that come out of novaclient, we should probably have novaclient > > > available for translations - at least of errors. > > > > > >> Andreas is right, putting projects in Zanata will not bring free > > >> translations. > > >> Based on my observation, translators prefer to translate UI projects > > >> more than other projects. > > >> For example, even I include Nova in the Liberty translation plan, the > > >> nova translation progress > > >> is not that good. > > >> In translation community, translation team, coordinators and even > > >> individual translators > > >> have the autonomy. > > > > So, policy sounds like: > > > > A project that wants translations - and is part of the big tent - can > > set it up. The i18n PTL suggests a priority and ask for translation of > > specific projects but translators are not limited on what to translate. > > > > Correct? > > > > Yes. > > > So, do you want to enable python-keystoneclient, python-novaclient, and > > python-neutronclient? Or only the later two since keystoneclient is > > deprecated and even throws warnings when used: > > > > Pending deprecation: Command-line interface to the OpenStack Identity API. > > This CLI is pending deprecation in favor of python-openstackclient. For a > > Python library, continue using python-keystoneclient. > > > > keystoneclient is only used for Python binding and the CLI in is deprecated. > So if there is no objections from keystone dev team, we could remove > keystoneclient. > Please enable openstack-novaclient because we get the request that > it needs translation. > I don't see neutronclient is deprecating. So please enable it too. > Thank you. > Just got inputs from keystone dev team. They said "openstackclient still receives strings from keystoneclient, (it uses keystoneclient to perform the requests) also, keystoneclient can be used by customer applications so they might want translated strings." So let's include python-keystoneclient in the translation projects. > > Andreas > > -- > > Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi > > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > >

2 1

What's Up, Doc? 25 September 2015
by Lana Brindley 25 Sep '15

25 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, First of all, thank you to everyone who has suggested sessions for docs at Tokyo. I'll keep the etherpad open for another week or so, just to give everyone a chance, and will start working on a draft schedule next week. I have spent most of this week on bug triage, which is repetitive work, but it's gratifying to see the numbers drop a little! == Progress towards Liberty == 19 days to go 534 bugs closed so far for this release. The main areas of focus we had during Liberty were the RST migration, paying down some of our technical debt, and improving our general communication issues. The RST conversion is well and truly complete, with just a couple of books waiting in the wings to be published. We have made some progress on improving our communication generally, with liaisons now more visible and involved, and some improved processes. Regarding old bugs, during Liberty we spotlighted a total of 24 bugs, exactly half of which have now been closed. == Mitaka Summit Prep == The schedule app for your phone is now available. This is a great tool once you're on the ground at Summit: https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=98721 6292&mt=8 (Apple) and https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.sched.openstacksummitm ay2015vancouver (Android) Docs have been allocated two fishbowls, four workrooms, and a half day meetup, so now is the time to start gathering ideas for what you would like to see us cover. Add your ideas to the etherpad here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tokyo-DocsSessions I'll create a draft session based on this feedback next week. == Bug Triage Process == The core team have been noticing a lot of people trying to close bugs that haven't been triaged recently. It is very important that you have someone else confirm your bug before you go ahead and create a patch. Waiting just a little while for triage can save you (and our core team!) a lot of work, and makes sure we don't let wayward changes past the gate. If you're unsure about whether you need to wait or not, or if you're in a hurry to work on a bug, you can always ping one of the core team on IRC or on our mailing list. The core team members are listed here, and we're always happy to help you out with a bug or a patch: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core This is even more important than usual as we get closer to the Liberty release, so remember: If it's not triaged, don't fix it! == Spotlight Bugs == During Liberty we spotlighted a total of 24 bugs, exactly half of which have now been closed. This is a great effort to clear out some old dusty bugs and pay down some technical debt. Thanks go out to Tom Fifield, Olga Gusarenko, Yusuke Ide, Brian Moss, Deena Cooper, and Alexandra Settle for taking them on! With Liberty and the Summit bearing down on us, though, let's focus back on what needs to be done for release. At Summit, we'll discuss how to expand and improve on this effort in future releases. == Doc team meeting == The US meeting was held this week. The minutes are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/MeetingLogs#2015-09-23 The next meetings will be the final meetings before the Liberty release: APAC: Wednesday 30 September, 00:30:00 UTC US: Wednesday 7 October, 14:00:00 UTC Please go ahead and add any agenda items to the meeting page here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_ meeting - -- Remember, if you have content you would like to add to this newsletter, or you would like to be added to the distribution list, please email me directly at openstack(a)lanabrindley.com, or visit: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/WhatsUpDoc Keep on doc'ing! Lana - -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWBNTTAAoJELppzVb4+KUyW6EH/2kYOYHa2DHfHJxN2XC1QcpD L3wwDWxu9B2G6M/hNzRJ/KELSVikfuK9+ChOA+kD2kXLs6dV1oLXXCbV2KIdHKWP +EYPG0G/CsMkoq8KIfzYwW6c2k+RzSXZAnI1ZhcRJiwhlIC5JlSZ118Y64GeLxmB jISEqsi7WdK76caMmEy+3+QrpBY/WNOVE5Dyu0TiwGTPtU1EuZEAXHkdFjczKEKM azlyyFIF4V28+BjrZpUybarEL2hZerHt2XiNd5dCRoQgE7b8ubJ0cidErPazI9AV mZNZO3VtLTfSC2ytNBwIBaN3ezJzC5mvba6ofDdej3jIvZf3o6IQihbMaYWyLDI= =uZBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

translating python clients
by Andreas Jaeger 25 Sep '15

25 Sep '15

We now have setup python-keystoneclient for translation and there're requests for python-heatclient and python-novaclient (https://review.openstack.org/224832 heat and https://review.openstack.org/224222 nova) Does it really make sense to translate these? Especially with the openstack client getting translated already? My proposal would be to concentrate on the openstack client and tell the teams to not mark the clients for translation. What do you think? Please see also http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073698.ht… Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

4 11

stable-liberty is created for nova project
by Ying Chun Guo 24 Sep '15

24 Sep '15

Hi, translation team Nova has its RC1 cut yesterday. Hard string freeze is happened. I have created the corresponding version for liberty in Zanata. The version name is stable-liberty. So from now on, all translations/review should be made in the stable-liberty version. The master version is set "Read Only" and will be open to accept translations after Liberty is done. Any problems, please let me know. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Douglas Fish 24 Sep '15

24 Sep '15

1 0

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Ying Chun Guo 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Thank you for looking into it, Illya. I think we need to fix it, although the manually process might be a little complex. I'm going to: 1. Create a new version in Zanata 2. Mark master as read only 2. Pull the source files and the translation files. 3. Change the pluralities settings in Russian translation files. 4. Upload the source files and translation files to the new version. 5. Check if the all things are right, change master version name to "master-old", and then change the new version name to "master" How do you want to update these pluralities then? By program ? Or manually ? Is it possible to make the changes through Zanata UI, other than uploading po files ? Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 09/23/2015 04:38:19 AM: > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > To: ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org > Cc: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com, openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 09/23/2015 04:38 AM > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > Hi Ilya, > > Thanks for looking at this! Unfortunately having 4 pluralities > confuses Horizon. I've tested out stripping one of the pluralities > and restoring the expected Plural-forms definition (just like the > one you linked) and it works great. > > I had hoped to just repair the PO files in this way and upload the > corrected translations to Zanata. > > Unfortunately, I understand from Daisy's research that once a > language/project has been created in Zanata in this way we cannot > just upload a PO file with corrected pluralities . More > investigation will be needed to understand the process to fix this. > > Doug > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Ilya Alekseyev <ilyaalekseyev(a)acm.org> > Sent by: ilya(a)phpcoder.ru > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com>, "openstack- > i18n(a)lists.openstack.org" <openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2015 2:39 PM > > Hi Doug and Daisy! > > Looks like we have wrong pluralities in current release: > in https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/ > openstack_dashboard/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/django.po > > we have: > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=4; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n" > "%10<=4 && (n%100<12 || n%100>14) ? 1 : n%10==0 || (n%10>=5 && n%10<=9) || (n" > "%100>=11 && n%100<=14)? 2 : 3);\n" > > but in previuos releses we have: > "Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n% > 10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n" > > Last one is right for Russian. > > We can make translation in Zanata for 4 pluralities, but it can give > in some cases bugs with wrong plural forms. > > Kind regards, > Ilya Alekseyev. > > 2015-09-22 14:22 GMT+03:00 Douglas Fish <drfish(a)us.ibm.com>: > Hi Daisy, > > I am certain this issue is caused by plural forms. The issue with > missing menus is seen with the current 4 plural form translations; > when I correct the PO file to have 3 forms Horizon properly displaysthe menus. > > Doug > > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Ying Chun Guo/China/IBM > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS@IBMAU > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2015 12:49 AM > > Hi, Doug > > We need to consider it carefully. > > After working with Zanata dev team, I got to understand: > > 1. Zanata has its own plural forms. If po file has its own plural > form, Zanata will use that. > Otherwise, Zanata will use its own plural form. Pluralforms in Zanata: > nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && > (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2). > So it looks like that OpenStack po files overrode the pluralforms in Zanata. > > 2. Zanata currently don't allow update of plural forms once the > document has been uploaded to Zanata. > Even with deletion of that source document and re-upload (in the > same project-version, same doc name and same path), > Zanata will still reuse the old pluralform. > > 3. If we want to update the pluralforms, we will need to do it in > new project-version > (don't use copy-from previous version function). > > I think we need to carefully design the steps to change pluralforms > of Russian. > At first, I want to confirm with you, are you sure this issue is > caused by plural forms? > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 2015/09/18 23:38:22: > > > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > To: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 2015/09/18 23:38 > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > Hi Daisy, > > > > Yes, I understand - I don't think I can even propose my branch > > unless I am added as a translator by the Russian team. > > > > My proposal would include removing one plural form for > > 4 messages in horizon django.po > > 1 message in horizon djangojs.po > > 144 messages in openstack_dashboard django.po > > 0 messages in openstack_dashboard djangojs.po > > plus the pluralization specification would be updated in all 4 files. > > > > Doug > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > From: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com> > > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 3:25 AM > > > > Are there a lot of changes in your proposed po files ? > > I'm still waiting for Russian team's response. > > > > Best regards > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > > > > "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> wrote on 09/18/2015 05:37:07 AM: > > > > > From: "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> > > > To: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > Date: 09/18/2015 05:38 AM > > > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > > > Hi translation friends, > > > > > > I'd like to contribute 4 PO files for the Horizon Russian > > > translation to correct the issue > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+bug/1494819 > > > > > > These uploads won't contain any new translations, but instead will > > > be an adjustment to the PO files so they have 3 pluralities, which > > is standard > > > http://localization-guide.readthedocs.org/en/latest/l10n/pluralforms.html > > > > > > Specifically, I plan to remove the msgstr[2] translation from the > > > files (because msgstr[2] is blank for many cases), rename the msgstr > > > [3] translation to msgstr[2] and adjust the plurality specification to > > > nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && > > > (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2); > > > > > > As discussed in the team meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/ > > > meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2015/openstack_i18n_meeting. > > > 2015-09-17-13.00.log.html > > > please create a Zanata branch so I can propose these corrections > for review. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Doug > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > > _______________________________________________ > Openstack-i18n mailing list > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n >

1 0

Re: [Openstack-i18n] IBM translations to contribute: update
by Ying Chun Guo 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Hi, team I have made enough tests on the test server with the help from Doug and his colleagues. In the test server, I created versions for nova, glance, cinder, swift, ceilometer, heat, keystone, and ironic. Doug and his colleagues uploaded their po files for languages de, es, fr, it, ja ko-KR, pr-BR, ru, zh-CN, and zh-TW. I tested merging two versions. Things are running well. The test server is still in good condition. So there is no technical issues block me to do the same in the production server. I even tried "Group" in the test server. The "Group" feature looks wonderful. So if there is no objections, I will go to production server, doing the same as what I did in the test server. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 09/18/2015 05:14:22 AM: > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > To: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 09/18/2015 05:14 AM > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] IBM translations to contribute: update > > Hi Daisy, > > We have translations to contribute for ceilometer, cinder, glance, > heat, ironic, keystone, nova and swift for languages de, es, fr, it, > ja ko-KR, pr-BR, ru, zh-CN, and zh-TW > > We are working to upload those to the Zanata test server to make > sure there are no technical issues. > > Doug > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com> > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: "Openstack-i18n Openstack-i18n" <openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] IBM translations to contribute: update > Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 11:04 AM > > Hi Doug, Hi team, > > In today's IRC meeting, we talked about the process to get IBM translations. > I'm going to normalize the process to contribute translations by > uploading po files. > > Here are some key points during the meeting: > > 1. It is strongly discouraged to use the offline editor other than web tool. > Because the offline editor could not take the advantages of > translation memory and glossary, > which might affect the translation quality. > 2. Simply uploading po files are not allowed because it has a risk > that the po files might contain bad translations. > 3. In some special cases, if people who want to contribute > translations by uploading po files, following below steps > 3.1 Send email to I18n mailing list, describing the source > documents and languages he/she is going to upload. > 3.2 Zanata admin will create a branch. Then contributors could > upload po files to the proposed branch. > 3.3 When the uploading is done, language coordinators could > review the translations. > The coordinators could have two kinds of review results: > agree to merge or deny to merge. > If the coordinators deny to merge, coordinators should > give some comments, either to delete this branch, or to suggestions > to improve. > 3.4 If the coordinators agree to merge to the master branch, > Zanata admin will make the merge. > A option could set during the branches merging to make sure not > overwrite translated/approved translations in the source branch. > After merging, the proposed branch will be deleted. > > I have been testing branches in the Zanata test server for several days. > When I make sure it works fine, I will go to the production server. > > @Doug, please let us know which resources and which languages you > are going to propose ? > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> wrote on 09/16/2015 08:05:52 PM: > > > From: "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> > > To: "Openstack-i18n Openstack-i18n" <openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 09/16/2015 08:06 PM > > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] IBM translations to contribute: update > > > > Here's the revised approach we are taking to contributing our IBM > > translations to the community, based on feedback on suggestions: > > > > We are planning to make the proposed translations available for a > > pre-review as a separate branch in Zanata, but they are not there > > yet. While testing out this upload on the development server we > > discovered that uploading PO files caused the server to become > > unresponsive for a while. Thanks to pleia2 and the infra team for > > sorting that out and addressing the issue. We'll try the upload on > > dev again tomorrow and if it goes well we will make the translations > > available for pre-review in a separate Zanata branch. > > > > I had originally proposed ending the pre-review on Monday. Obviously > > that's not going to happen! I understand that different language > > teams have differing levels of readiness to accept these > > contributions. I understand some groups are ready at this time, > > while others would like to have more time, possibly even into Mitaka > > to review. We aren't going to upload PO files for any language were > > the team does not want them. > > > > Language coordinators, please let me know how you'd like to proceed > > with these contributions for your language. Do you want > > 1) us to upload them to Zanata's current master translations for > > normal review and editing as soon as we can, > > 2) us to upload them to Zanata as a separate branch for further > pre-review, or > > 3) hold off any submission or preview at this time. > > > > Please note that it important to us that we upload these > > translations. The translations are a valued IBM asset, it's > > important to us that they are recognized as contributed by IBM. > > > > I'll be at the Thursday i18n team meeting, and am available by IRC > > (doug-fish) or email if you have questions or further concerns. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Doug_______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n

6 17

Arabic Script mixed with Gurmukhi Script in Translation Memory
by ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Hi there, As I don't know how this mix up happened so someone please respond to this issue. After the migration has done and i am doing translation in Zanata I am quite surprised to see Arabic script in my Translation Memory of many projects. I have clarified before, and explaining again, that Punjabi has two entirely different scripts i.e. Gurmukhi (ਪੈਂਤੀ) and Shahmukhi (اردو), while former is widely used in Indian side of Punjab aka Eastern Punjab the latter is used in Pakistani side of Punjab aka Western Punjab. I guess while migration someone has mistaken both the scripts as one and joined them. As this is my assumption so it is you guys, will have to help me out. Thanks Amandeep Singh Saini Co-ordinator Punjabi Team (pa-IN)

3 5

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Russian translations with 4 pluralities?
by Douglas Fish 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

3 2

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Douglas Fish 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

2 2

Automatic copying of translations in Zanata?
by Andreas Jaeger 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Today the majority of the IBM translations got merged into the the normal versions since zanata by default searches at every upload with the zanata client for translation of untranslated strings and merges them [1]. So, when ceilometer got uploaded as master version, the IBM ceilometer strings where searched for already translated strings and untranslated ceilometer strings where automatically translated with the IBM version. Daisy, Clark, Lyz, and myself just had some discussion on #openstack-i18n and decided to disable for now the automatic copying of translations while we discuss what to do next. The question for me is, do we want this kind of automatic copying of translations - and if, how do we want it. Previously enabled was copying only in a project between versions. So, for example if there is a stable/liberty and a master version (or an IBM and a master version) of the same document, and one contains a translated string and the other gets updated, the translated string gets copied over if the string is not translated yet. This feature can also be enabled for copying between projects and files. So, we could enable it and then when a string gets translated in let's say nova and exactly the same string is in neutron and untranslated, the translation would be copied from nova to neutron. So, question to discuss: 1) Do we translators want such automatic translations? 2) And if yes, only between: a) versions of same document b) inside a project (so, only inside nova) c) across all projects and documents Note that this setting is the same for all languages. Note that there's an option as well to do this automatic translation manually, for example at project creation time. So, if a new project gets setup, Zanata could try to copy automaticly translations across projects for a quick start. What do you think? Do you want to translate each string manually - or let Zanata do the work and to which extend? I hope I summarized everything correctly, if not please correct my understanding, Andreas References: [1] http://zanata.org/help/copytrans-explained/ -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

1 0

Please review IBM translations in the master branch
by Ying Chun Guo 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Hi, friends Something unexpected happened tonight. IBM translations were copied into master branches. The copy action is triggered by uploading of pot files, which are executed by automatic Jenkins jobs when the source pot files in code repo are updated. Nobody expects it. Infrastructure team have figure out a way to stop auto copy while uploading pot files so this kind of things won't happen the second time. IBM translations only fill in blanks without overwriting the others. I hope translation teams could take a look at IBM translations in the master branches. IBM contributions could be located by searching "last-modified-after: 2015-09-21". You could * improve translations if they are easily to improve. Different terminologies could easily be fixed by "project-wide Search & Replace". ( in the Editor view, click the magnifying glass icon on the right top corner to open the search&replace view.) * reject some translations if you don't like. * If you don't like the whole translations at all, I may work out a way to revert it but it will cost time. The relevant translation teams include: de es fr it ja ko_KR pt_BR ru zh_CN zh_TW. The relevant documents are: nova.pot, glance.pot, swift.pot, ceilometer.pot, cinder.pot, heat.pot, ironic.pot, keystone.pot and neutron.pot. Sorry for the troubles and thank you for your work. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

IP capitalization change in nova - ok to merge?
by Andreas Jaeger 22 Sep '15

22 Sep '15

Translation team, I've just send a patch for review that fixes lots of user visible capitalization strings in nova as I noticed during translation that it should be "IP" and not "ip" for example in "fixed IP". Is it ok to get this patch in now - or should I wait after liberty and mark it as WIP for now? https://review.openstack.org/225923 Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

2 1

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Ying Chun Guo 22 Sep '15

22 Sep '15

Hi, Doug We need to consider it carefully. After working with Zanata dev team, I got to understand: 1. Zanata has its own plural forms. If po file has its own plural form, Zanata will use that. Otherwise, Zanata will use its own plural form. Pluralforms in Zanata: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2). So it looks like that OpenStack po files overrode the pluralforms in Zanata. 2. Zanata currently don't allow update of plural forms once the document has been uploaded to Zanata. Even with deletion of that source document and re-upload (in the same project-version, same doc name and same path), Zanata will still reuse the old pluralform. 3. If we want to update the pluralforms, we will need to do it in new project-version (don't use copy-from previous version function). I think we need to carefully design the steps to change pluralforms of Russian. At first, I want to confirm with you, are you sure this issue is caused by plural forms? Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM wrote on 2015/09/18 23:38:22: > From: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > To: guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Date: 2015/09/18 23:38 > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > Hi Daisy, > > Yes, I understand - I don't think I can even propose my branch > unless I am added as a translator by the Russian team. > > My proposal would include removing one plural form for > 4 messages in horizon django.po > 1 message in horizon djangojs.po > 144 messages in openstack_dashboard django.po > 0 messages in openstack_dashboard djangojs.po > plus the pluralization specification would be updated in all 4 files. > > Doug > > ----- Original message ----- > From: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com> > To: Douglas Fish/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 3:25 AM > > Are there a lot of changes in your proposed po files ? > I'm still waiting for Russian team's response. > > Best regards > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> wrote on 09/18/2015 05:37:07 AM: > > > From: "Douglas Fish" <drfish(a)us.ibm.com> > > To: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 09/18/2015 05:38 AM > > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819 > > > > Hi translation friends, > > > > I'd like to contribute 4 PO files for the Horizon Russian > > translation to correct the issue > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+bug/1494819 > > > > These uploads won't contain any new translations, but instead will > > be an adjustment to the PO files so they have 3 pluralities, which > is standard > > http://localization-guide.readthedocs.org/en/latest/l10n/pluralforms.html > > > > Specifically, I plan to remove the msgstr[2] translation from the > > files (because msgstr[2] is blank for many cases), rename the msgstr > > [3] translation to msgstr[2] and adjust the plurality specification to > > nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && > > (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2); > > > > As discussed in the team meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/ > > meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2015/openstack_i18n_meeting. > > 2015-09-17-13.00.log.html > > please create a Zanata branch so I can propose these corrections for review. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n

1 0

Translation of Nova
by Ying Chun Guo 21 Sep '15

21 Sep '15

Hi, John I put nova project as the first non-user interface project in Liberty translation. I set nova.pot as "required to be translated" and set nova-log-* as "optional to be translated". I understand nova.pot contains all user facing messages. But I don't clear what kinds of messages they are. Could you explain what kinds of messages nova.pot includes and how these messages are visible to end users ? There is another mail thread[1] discussing that python-openstackclient should be high priority to translate. And other clients such as python-novaclient are deprecating and should not be translated or lower priority to be translated. I know you are busy with the RC1 cut. When you are available, help to share some inputs. Thank you. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/2015-September/001389.h…

2 1

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Zanata, message to the team
by Akihiro Motoki 21 Sep '15

21 Sep '15

I see no technical reason. I am okay if we have a consensus that we can use various languages on the list to discuss topics specific to languages. Does everybody want this? I don't think it works if message in Frensh, Spanish, Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Korean, Turkish, Arabian and more on a single list. I might be missing something important. OpenStack foundation provides use the mailing list server under openstack.org domain and local communities can use it. Akihiro 2015-09-17 23:40 GMT+09:00 Douglas Fish <drfish(a)us.ibm.com>: > Can't other languages be used on the mailing list? Is this a technical > limitation? > > Doug > > > Akihiro Motoki <amotoki(a)gmail.com> wrote on 09/17/2015 09:08:26 AM: > > > From: Akihiro Motoki <amotoki(a)gmail.com> > > To: Openstack-i18n Openstack-i18n <openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 09/17/2015 09:09 AM > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Zanata, message to the team > > > > One thing to note is that each language team would like to discuss > > in its language in most cases. > > > We don't want to use English in translation discussion :p > > Thus I think this mailing does not work to address the original question. > > > > In Japanese case, we use a mailing list in the local community, > > but not all language team has such media and they might had Transifex > > messaging to communicate each other. > > > > 2015-09-17 22:50 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com>: > > On 2015-09-17 15:19, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2015-09-17 07:58:39 -0500 (-0500), Douglas Fish wrote: > > Can't the openstack-i18n mailing list be used for this? In the > > openstack-dev lists multiple teams use it and we just include [horizon] > or > > [keystone] or similar as appropriate to help sort out messages to > > interested parties. > > > > The nice thing about this is that it makes the discussion open to others > > who might take interest periodically. > > > > Not only that, the discussion is also archived and accessible > > anonymously over the Web. Any group contact mechanism built into > > Zanata as an afterthought is going to be inferior to proper mailing > > lists as a general discussion platform. > > > > > Challenge is that not every translator is subscribed here AFAIU. How > > can we encourage usage of this mailing list? > > > > Andreas > > -- > > Andreas Jaeger aj(a){suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi > > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > _______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > >

4 4

Liberty translation progress report
by Ying Chun Guo 21 Sep '15

21 Sep '15

Hi, team 10 days passed since we started Liberty translation. Now let's review the progress we made. 1. Horizon translations Till today, following teams have made amazing progress. Many thanks for their works. These teams could certainly finish Horizon translation on time. They are: Japanese 100.0% English (Australia) 99.63% French 98.61% German 98.51% Chinese (China) 97.56% Spanish 97.28% Turkish (Turkey) 96.76% Czech 96.55% Korean (South Korea) 96.0% Chinese (Taiwan) 95.12% Portuguese (Brazil) 93.13% Following teams have possibilities to catch the deadline too. They are: English (United Kingdom) 87.85% Russian 83.58% Polish (Poland)80.48% If coordinators of those language teams have difficulties to catch the goal, please let me know as soon as possible. 2. Horizon authorization page translations This is not a big resource. There are 12 languages 100% completed. They are: Chinese (China),Czech,English (Australia), English (United Kingdom),German, Japanese,Korean (South Korea), Portuguese (Brazil),Russian,Spanish,Spanish (Mexico), Turkish (Turkey). There are only a very few strings left in Chinese (Taiwan), Polish (Poland), and French translations. Please don't forget to finish them. 3. Nova translations nova.pot is included in Liberty translation plan. Following language teams have made good progress: Chinese (China) 100.0% Czech 99.63% Spanish 94.78% Turkish (Turkey) 94.1% Some others languages team might not have good progress. I understand some translators are not active in Nova translations. For those language teams, I will suggest to import IBM translations. While I did test, after merging IBM translations, the percentage will increase to 90% and even more. I hope coordinators could take a serious consideration of this suggestion. I appreciate very much your contributions in Liberty translations. I'm very sure we will get a good result in Liberty. Thank you. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

PTL Elections September 2015
by Ying Chun Guo 21 Sep '15

21 Sep '15

Hi, team We just became a official team in Liberty, I guess some of you are not familiar with PTL elections process. Every official project must elect a PTL. PTLs are elected for 6 months. All ATC's have the right to vote for your favorite PTL for a cycle. Refer to this wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September_2015 I have submitted my candidacy for I18n team just now. Hope to get your support for my PTL role for Mitaka. Thank you. Regards Daisy

2 2

Would like Zanata branch to correct 1494819
by Douglas Fish 18 Sep '15

18 Sep '15

2 2

Re: [Openstack-i18n] Zanata, message to the team
by Robert Simai 18 Sep '15

18 Sep '15

Hi Doug, I see one advantage in that approach, the list is already there. I see more disadvantages: - we'd need to make sure that all translators are subscribed. I don't think it's the case - for a regular translator many stuff discussed here may not be relevant or interesting - they will all have to setup proper email filtering and it needs discipline for the poster to stick to that. You'd probably need two tags, one for the project and one for the language - we can't use the local language to discuss language specific stuff but need to stick to English And there may be a few more. These however were my thoughts why I (still) think it should rather be a Zanata feature as there we have user/team information and could easily target messages to relevant people. -- Thanks, Robert On Thu Sep 17 2015 14:58:39 GMT+0200 (CEST) drfish(a)us.ibm.com wrote: > Can't the openstack-i18n mailing list be used for this? In the > openstack-dev lists multiple teams use it and we just include [horizon] > or [keystone] or similar as appropriate to help sort out messages to > interested parties. > > The nice thing about this is that it makes the discussion open to others > who might take interest periodically. > > Doug > > > Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> wrote on 09/17/2015 03:32:30 AM: > > > From: Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> > > To: Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com>, > openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > Date: 09/17/2015 03:33 AM > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-i18n] Zanata, message to the team > > > > Hi Daisy, > > > > On Thu Sep 17 2015 09:04:33 GMT+0200 (CEST) guoyingc(a)cn.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > Hi, Rob > > > > > > I didn't find the method to message team either. > > > I just find an instance messaging method to communicate with people who > > > are translating the same document. > > > > Yes, but that clearly has another purpose. > > > > > I think you might use email to talk with your team members. > > > I know it's not good. > > > > Frankly, it's less than not good as it means I (and whoever wants to do > > this) need to setup and maintain my own email distribution list all > > manually. > > > > > We could discuss how to add more communication ways. > > > Either ask Zanata to provide a feature, or we use a communicate method > > > on top of openstack infra. > > > > Well, I don't mind how it's done but would greatly appreciate if there's > > some easy way to send notifications to the specific language team. It > > probably should be a Zanata feature. > > > > > Best regards > > > Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) > > > > Thanks, > > Robert > > > > > > > > Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> wrote on 2015/09/16 23:38:10: > > > > > > > From: Robert Simai <robert.simai(a)suse.com> > > > > To: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > > Date: 2015/09/16 23:38 > > > > Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Zanata, message to the team > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > probably I simply don't see it but how would I - as coordinator or > > > > regular team member - send a message to the translation team for my > > > > language? The only message I can create is "contact coordinators", > > > > myself so to say. > > > > > > > > Do I overlook this feature or is it just missing? If the latter, I'd > > > > clearly like to have it as I'm not sure if we can expect to have all > > > > translators on the openstack-i18n mailing list. In Transifex we > had the > > > > "discussions" forum to reach out to all team members, that was very > > > helpful. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openstack-i18n mailing list > > Openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-i18n > > >

3 2

Zanata, message to the team
by Robert Simai 18 Sep '15

18 Sep '15

Hi, probably I simply don't see it but how would I - as coordinator or regular team member - send a message to the translation team for my language? The only message I can create is "contact coordinators", myself so to say. Do I overlook this feature or is it just missing? If the latter, I'd clearly like to have it as I'm not sure if we can expect to have all translators on the openstack-i18n mailing list. In Transifex we had the "discussions" forum to reach out to all team members, that was very helpful. -- Thanks, Robert

6 9

What's Up, Doc? 18 Sep 2015
by Lana Brindley 18 Sep '15

18 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, First of all, with PTL candidacy now closed, it appears that I will be continuing to hold the docs reins through to Mitaka. Thank you to all of you who contacted me personally over the last week or so, expressing their support. I'm very honoured to be leading such a great team, and I'm looking forward to continuing to serve you. As always, my door will continue to be open to ideas, comments, and criticism, so please keep telling me what you do and don't like! We're less than a month away from the Liberty release now, and with the Mitaka PTL question settled, I'll be working on Design Summit session planning over the next few weeks. I've created an etherpad to gather your ideas, more on that in this newsletter. In other news, testing is now well underway on the Install Guide, I've knocked our existing blueprints into order, been doing some thinking about the DocImpact script, and worked with the speciality teams on determining the final work items for Liberty. == Progress towards Liberty == 26 days to go 514 bugs closed so far for this release. * RST conversion: ** Done. * User Guides information architecture overhaul ** Underway. Some tasks to be held over to Mitaka. * Greater focus on helping out devs with docs in their repo ** A certain amount of progress has been made here, and some wrinkles sorted out which will improve this process for the future. * Improve how we communicate with and support our corporate contributors ** I'm still trying to come up with great ideas for this, please let me know what you think. * Improve communication with Docs Liaisons ** I'm very pleased to see liaisons getting more involved in our bugs and reviews. Keep up the good work! * Clearing out old bugs ** Great work this week, with two bugs from the last two weeks closed (thanks Deena and Tom!). Three new bugs this week. == Mitaka Summit Prep == The schedule app for your phone is now available. This is a great tool once you're on the ground at Summit: https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=98721 6292&mt=8 (Apple) and https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.sched.openstacksummitm ay2015vancouver (Android) Docs have been allocated two fishbowls, four workrooms, and a half day meetup, so now is the time to start gathering ideas for what you would like to see us cover. Add your ideas to the etherpad here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tokyo-DocsSessions == Outstanding Specs == * Third Party Driver Content: This spec has been outstanding for a while, and we've finally reached a consensus on how to move forward. Please take a moment to review the spec here before we go ahead merge it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191041/ * DocImpact: These are my ideas for reducing the noise from the DocImpact script, now up for discussion and ideas: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/224420/ == Doc team meeting == The APAC meeting was held this week. The minutes are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/MeetingLogs#2015-09-16 The next meetings are: US: Wednesday 23 September, 14:00:00 UTC APAC: Wednesday 30 September, 00:30:00 UTC Please go ahead and add any agenda items to the meeting page here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_ meeting == Spotlight bugs for this week == Let's show these three that we're never going to give them up, never going to let them down: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1293328 Review Identity & LDAP integration https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1294726 Update Cloud Administration Guide for OpenDaylight ML2 MechanismDriver https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1300960 Making DB sanity checking be optional for DB migration - -- Remember, if you have content you would like to add to this newsletter, or you would like to be added to the distribution list, please email me directly at openstack(a)lanabrindley.com, or visit: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/WhatsUpDoc Keep on doc'ing! Lana - -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV+5L5AAoJELppzVb4+KUyEUcIANEavuRkTwSC44KEMVCvdzBw Q/luFp6zO/mySSfys0mFnB3/3GmQFQqSqW3FqLc9hWHIQQxxmG8VW9/Bhym5GNmr UMveZw+0winC4y41en1ZFFBz03uiQTvHVAFDmqjFHtgvWd/L3O9isrCsP3hnQ3JK Dl4Huaw6ZowbRgYTK7Jaspuu/mS7Me8hUsvOCpBPvxQX3lYFBvOR93lwBEqNHp5B gu05Cy50KnwbrY+TQfrTEMiYxtyia1nf9SHF+9/5fxkzq9i4/Ine9WKIuYsOYI8u crJl9IPPKbgyMSp775RLQ9nFIXeh6cRDYWVVW29z1n1zYt9C7zcpZiDngkD8Zqg= =5yfK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

IBM translations to contribute: update
by Douglas Fish 18 Sep '15

18 Sep '15

Here's the revised approach we are taking to contributing our IBM translations to the community, based on feedback on suggestions: We are planning to make the proposed translations available for a pre-review as a separate branch in Zanata, but they are not there yet. While testing out this upload on the development server we discovered that uploading PO files caused the server to become unresponsive for a while. Thanks to pleia2 and the infra team for sorting that out and addressing the issue. We'll try the upload on dev again tomorrow and if it goes well we will make the translations available for pre-review in a separate Zanata branch. I had originally proposed ending the pre-review on Monday. Obviously that's not going to happen! I understand that different language teams have differing levels of readiness to accept these contributions. I understand some groups are ready at this time, while others would like to have more time, possibly even into Mitaka to review. We aren't going to upload PO files for any language were the team does not want them. Language coordinators, please let me know how you'd like to proceed with these contributions for your language. Do you want 1) us to upload them to Zanata's current master translations for normal review and editing as soon as we can, 2) us to upload them to Zanata as a separate branch for further pre-review, or 3) hold off any submission or preview at this time. Please note that it important to us that we upload these translations. The translations are a valued IBM asset, it's important to us that they are recognized as contributed by IBM. I'll be at the Thursday i18n team meeting, and am available by IRC (doug-fish) or email if you have questions or further concerns. Thanks! Doug

2 2

IBM translations to contribute
by Douglas Fish 17 Sep '15

17 Sep '15

Hi i18n Friends, I'm happy to share that we are proceeding with our plan to share our IBM translations with the OpenStack community. To review and follow up on what was shared in the 2015-08-20 i18n team meeting [1]: - We would like to contribute our IBM translations for projects ceilometer, glance, heat, nova, ironic, neutron, cinder, keystone, and swift. Note that Horizon is not in this list because the community has been focused on translating Horizon; I'm concerned there may be excessive terminology conflicts. - We have translations for de es fr it ja ko_KR pt_BR ru zh_CN zh_TW - These contributions are based on our Kilo translations. They have been reviewed and tested. - In order to facilitate an informal review by the translation teams before uploading I've made the translations available at https://github.com/doug-fish/openstack-translations . The repository is private. If you'd like access, just share your github id with me via email (drfish(a)us.ibm.com) or IRC (doug-fish) and I'll give you access. - Segments that have been updated with IBM translations have a comment "Contributed by IBM" added. This is to enable reviewing; I don't expect these comments to remain in Zanata after the upload. At a high level, our process is that we are extracting the existing PO files from Zanata, then using Babel based code to compare our IBM translations with the community ones and filling in any blanks. We've taken care not to overwrite any existing translations. These proposed files are based on what we extracted from Zanata recently (today). Our intent is to run this tooling again after the review period to pick up any community translations that have occurred. I'm aware that translations for Nova are not updated in Zanata yet, but again, I expect to handle this by re-running our tools. I'm working with Thomas Cocozzello (tjcocozz) and Lucas Palm (lapalm) who have coded our tools and scripts to handle this. They are requesting to join the language teams in Zanata so that if there are no concerns noted during the review they can upload translation contributions. I plan to ask Tom and Lucas to upload these files on 2015-09-14 unless there are concerns noted during the reviews. Please let me know if you have questions or concerns! Doug 1. http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n/2015/openstack_i18n.… Doug Fish

6 8

Migration to Zanata will start at 00:00UTC September 9th
by Ying Chun Guo 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

Hello, team I'm so excited that the migration to Zanata finally comes, officially. It will start at 00:00UTC Sep 9th, (~2 hour from now). Please STOP your translations on Transifex now, till infrastructure team makes the announcement that migration is completely done. Or else, it could cause problems and your work will be lost. Translations from September 8th UTC time will be included in the migration. When the switch is made, pushing to and pulling from Transifex will be stopped. Please NOTICE: Translations made in Transifex after September 8th UTC will NO LONGER be submitted to OpenStack. All the users information and teams information in translate-dev.openstack.org will be included in the migration too. Please STOP the registration and adding team members in translate-dev.openstack.org. When migration is done, you could use the official website: translate.openstack.org. Hope everything runs well. Thank you for your corporation. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

6 11

IRC meeting tomorrow
by Ying Chun Guo 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

Hello, team We will have the IRC meeting at UTC 1300 in the channel #openstack-meeting, on September 17th. Following topics will be covered: * Collect issues/questions for Zanata and Liberty translation * Discussion: IBM contributions * Open discussions If you have other topics, feel free to propose. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

am I getting it wrong?
by ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

check these strings in nova-log-warning please 1) - %(logprefix)sfile does not exist - Resource ID: 8b11140881a372e28617726d6551bf55 2) - %(logprefix)unexpected IOError when reading - Resource ID: cb2f6d7cc64d66e928c3d4bfc62fc2f0 3) - %(logprefix)sfailed to load json - Resource ID: 82759c0db94169cf8d6b3bf6d5bb28ae Am i getting these wrong or there are actually some blank spaces missing in the source strings? Sorry for spamming the mailing list :) Amandeep Singh

4 7

[all] New Gerrit translations change proposals from Zanata
by Elizabeth K. Joseph 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

Hi everyone, Daisy announced to the i18n team last week[0] that we've moved to using Zanata for translations for the Liberty cycle. Everyone should now be using Zanata at https://translate.openstack.org/ for translations. We're just now finishing up the infrastructure side of things with the switch from having Transifex submit the translations proposals to Gerrit to having Zanata do it. The Gerrit topic for these change proposals for all projects with translations has been changed from "transifex/translations" to "zanata/translations". After a test with oslo.versionedobjects last week[1], we're moving forward this Wednesday morning UTC time to have the jobs run so that all translations changes proposed to Gerrit are made by Zanata. Please let us know if you run into any problems or concerns with the changes being proposed to your project. The infra and i18n teams will have a look and provide help as needed. Thanks everyone, these are exciting times for the i18n team! [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/2015-September/001331.h… [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222712/ note that the topic: had not yet been updated at the time of this change, but it has now -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2

1 0

Usability problem for coordinators: managing join requests?
by Tom Fifield 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Hi, Please excuse me if I'm missing something obvious here - Zanata is quite new to me :) Based on my experience, it seems the process for approving a member request is very "manual" and could be quite frustrating for the large teams. 1. Email comes in: """ Dear Language Team Coordinator, Zanata user "Example Name" with id "example" is requesting to join the en (English) language team Roles requested: Translator Reviewer Coordinator Example Name has included the following message with this request: You can add user with username "Example Name" to the "en" team as translator using the "Add Team Member" action on the language team page. You can click the link below to go directly to the en-GB Language Team Page. Please reply to Example Name at example(a)example.org when you have finished processing this request. https://translate.openstack.org:443/language/view/en You are receiving this mail because: You are a coordinator in the "English" language team """ 2. Click the link to go to the Language Team 3. Can't do anything - need to login, so click login 4. After logging in, you are back at your personal profile page. Can't action the request here, so go back to the email and click the link again 5. Expect to see something about the new request on the language team page, but there's nothing there. Can't action the request, so go back and read the email again. 6. Click the plus button to get the "Add Team Member" dialogue and realise you need to copy and paste the username from the email into the box. 7. Realise you don't remember which roles the user applied for. Go back and check the email a fourth time, then enter the roles and click add. 8. Email says it's now up to you to manually email the user to let them know they were added :) Are any other coordinators having this experience? Transifex wasn't perfect in how it dealt with join requests, but at least you could easily see a list of all of the requests for your language and approve them with a single click. If I'm not missing something, and this really is the procedure we need to run through 50 times for the larger languages to on-board everyone, then doing it on an ongoing basis, it seems less than ideal :) Regards, Tom

4 4

Updating Translations documentation for Zanata
by Elizabeth K. Joseph 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Hi everyone, The documentation on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Translations is now out-dated with our switch to Zanata, and just this morning we had a question about it in the #openstack-i18n channel. For now, I've placed a heading on that page explaining that the Transifex information is now out-dated, but we will work to get this documentation updated over the next couple weeks. If there's other documentation out there about OpenStack Translations please let me know so I can make sure it's on my list to update. -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2

3 3

What Up, Doc? 11 September, 2015
by Lana Brindley 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, Things are really starting to heat up now! Summit preparations are well underway, PTL elections just opened, and testing is proceeding apace on the Install Guide. As well as preparing my candidacy for Mitaka Docs PTL, I've been continuing to sort out the outstanding blueprints, and also planning for some announcements in Tokyo. One of the interesting things I learned while compiling a list of Liberty achievements is that we have released fixes for nearly 500 bugs since Kilo was released. What an amazing achievement! == Progress towards Liberty == 33 days to go 496 bugs closed so far. * RST conversion: ** Done. * User Guides information architecture overhaul ** This is now well underway. * Greater focus on helping out devs with docs in their repo ** A certain amount of progress has been made here, and some wrinkles sorted out which will improve this process for the future. * Improve how we communicate with and support our corporate contributors ** I'm still trying to come up with great ideas for this, please let me know what you think. * Improve communication with Docs Liaisons ** I'm very pleased to see liaisons getting more involved in our bugs and reviews. Keep up the good work! * Clearing out old bugs ** We've had some solid progress on last week's bugs, with two assigned, and one of those in progress. Three new bugs this week. == Mitaka Summit Prep == The schedule has now been released, congratulations to everyone who had a talk accepted this time around: https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/schedule/ All ATCs should have received their pass by now, so now is the time to be booking your travel and accommodation: https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/tokyo-and-travel/ Docs have been given their design summit session allocation, so start thinking about what you would like to see discussed. I'll send out an etherpad to start planning in the next week or two. == Conventions == A new governance patch has landed which changes the way we capitalise service names (I know almost exactly 50% of you will be happy about this!): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions#Service_and_pr oject_names Please be aware of this when editing files, and remember that the 'source of truth' for these things is the projects.yaml file: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projec ts.yaml == Doc team meeting == The US meeting was held this week. The minutes are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/MeetingLogs#2015-09-09 The next meetings are: APAC: Wednesday 16 September, 00:30:00 UTC US: Wednesday 23 September, 14:00:00 UTC Please go ahead and add any agenda items to the meeting page here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_ meeting == Spotlight bugs for this week == Let's show these three how much we care: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1284301 Document Neutron SSL-VPN for cloudadmin https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1288044 Add user defined extra capabilities https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1292327 Make cors work better - -- Remember, if you have content you would like to add to this newsletter, or you would like to be added to the distribution list, please email me directly at openstack(a)lanabrindley.com, or visit: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/WhatsUpDoc Keep on doc'ing! Lana - -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV9km4AAoJELppzVb4+KUyr0kIALxedlQxY0jONXXD+xaPNW76 JPjpnBrBjGyIvq09qeqU4vYVkSq56eF2qPtY6YCKmu0nkjTxAoJX0JxqGyTq3J+H nPv/+Hyg/VOJaZmJ6Qs3Ij1w9759OLiovnUjh3IsjkkZOXN/uHxw5LZQ3oXhmK+j Ydui86STbM1OUtOeNcxgH5zGl4aj/SWCrOwARAKXs6K0JShUvvtYmxPnQwvX/Mgn uLy9976PoboOR6SCW052ZBNT1VKHPOjpCaK3xOf7JJZQYi1V1Uv7BJwpSTBiyYOv MFvHRETKiWvfbyDKvvR1tYxyQixGq/aQWWcxke14YugEjFZ3wUAoWdwiD0VfXsA= =52+9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[nova] [all] Updated String Freeze Guidelines
by John Garbutt 10 Sep '15

10 Sep '15

Hi, I have had quite a few comments from folks about the string freeze being too strict. It was noted that: * users will prefer an untranslated log, over a silent failure * translators don't want existing strings changing while they are translating them * translators tooling can cope OK with moved strings and new strings After yesterday's cross project meeting, and hanging out in #openstack-i18n I have come up with these updates to the String Freeze Guidelines: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StringFreeze Basically, we have a Soft String Freeze from Feature Freeze until RC1: * Translators work through all existing strings during this time * So avoid changing existing translatable strings * Additional strings are generally OK Then post RC1, we have a Hard String Freeze: * No new strings, and no string changes * Exceptions need discussion Then at least 10 working days after RC1: * we need a new RC candidate to include any updated strings Is everyone happy with these changes? Thanks, John

2 1

String Freeze Guidelines Update
by John Garbutt 10 Sep '15

10 Sep '15

Hi all, Daisy and I have been chatting about the String Freeze guidelines. After our conversations, and some discussion in the cross project meeting, I have updated them here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StringFreeze It seems the general string freeze got accidentally got made super strict. Hopefully this slight relaxing of the rules will work better for everyone, particularly for our users. Certainly right now we are only merging bug fixes, but they often include the need for extra log messages, or similar. Right now we are hiding logs as debug messages, etc, to try and get them merged during the freeze. The above changes should stop all that pain, and help our users too. Does this sound sensible? Thanks, John IRC: johnthetubaguy

3 4

Liberty translation, go!
by Ying Chun Guo 10 Sep '15

10 Sep '15

Hello, team As the new translation tool - Zanata is ready to use, let's kick off the Liberty translation from today. The Liberty translation plan includes Horizon translation and Nova translation. We are quite familiar with Horizon translations. Here are the Horizon documents to be translated in Liberty: https://translate.openstack.org/iteration/view/horizon/master/documents Since Kilo release, there are 500+ new introduced messages. Nova is the first time to be included in the translation plan. It could be regarded as a trial that I18n team would translate more kinds of user facing messages in the future. Here are the Nova documents to be translated: https://translate.openstack.org/iteration/view/nova/master/documents Document "nova" contains user facing messages, which is required to be translated. Documents "nova-log-*" contain different levels of log messages, which are optional to be translated. Whether to translate log messages and which levels to be translated could be the decision of each language team. In Liberty translation, we use two phases of string freeze: the soft freeze and the hard freeze[1]. Soft freeze is already happened at feature freeze time. Hard freeze will be happened in the week of 21st September. New strings will be added before the strict freeze while we are translating. After strict freeze there will be few strings added, and then we will get 10 days to finish up the translations. Oct 12-16 is the official Liberty release date. We have to finish all the translations several days before the final release, in order to give time to development team to import translations, package everything, and run final tests. So Oct 5 would be an appropriate deadline for translation. If you want your language pack to be included in Liberty release, work with your language team, finish these translations before Oct. 5. Zanata is a new tool for translation team. Wiki page [2] describes how to register and how to join a language team. Zanata translators guide [3] is helpful if you don't know how to use Zanata. If you meet with any issues or problems you cannot solve, ask for help through the IRC channel and the mailing list. There is a strong infrastructure team and a supportive Zanata team behind us. September is a busy time for translators. Let's start Liberty translation now. Any questions, please let me know. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StringFreeze [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/I18nTeam/become-a-official-translator [3] http://docs.zanata.org/en/release/user-guide/translator-guide/

1 0

Request for Assistance with OpenStack Diversity Survey
by Roland Chan 10 Sep '15

10 Sep '15

Hi All, As part of the OpenStack Foundation's Diversity Working Group. ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Diversity) I am coordinating a survey of the OpenStack community. The intent of the survey is the measure the diversity of the community in various areas to determine priorities for action. The survey covers a great number of topics: gender, sexuality, geography and language use. It would be of assistance if the survey could be translated into multiple languages to maximise the ease with which the people can respond. There are about 15 short questions that would need to be translated. I'm aware that additional work at this time of the cycle is probably the last thing anyone needs, but if anyone is free to assist for any language, please contact me. Even advice would be welcome if translation is not feasible. Also, if anyone is interested in participating in the Diversity Working Group, check out the link above and come to a meeting. Thanks! Roland Chan

1 0

[Openstack-infra] No encoding string on Zanata
by SungJin Kang 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

hi Today translation tool maigration to Zanata. I no see korean string. [1] .po file is show korean string. Maybe you want korean font. Using NanumGothic font [2]. Thanks, sungjin. [1]: http://imgur.com/Bu7IJH5 [2]: https://github.com/ujuc/nanum-font

1 1

Fwd: Final plans before translations switch to Zanata
by ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ 09 Sep '15

09 Sep '15

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Arvinder Singh Kang* <contact(a)arvinderkang.com> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Final plans before translations switch to Zanata To: Amandeep Saini <jimidar(a)gmail.com> pa-IN is flawed and Panjabi is not a proprietary language of India - but language is spread across the world.e.g. It is the third most spoken/written language in BC after English. Also pa-Arab is not appropriate because there is no direct connection between spoken Arabic and Punjabi. pa-Guru / pa-Shah would make a much better argument. On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:18 AM, ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ <jimidar(a)gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jimidar(a)gmail.com');>> wrote: What you think about suggested language codes for opensatck in zanata? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Sean Flanigan* <sflaniga(a)redhat.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sflaniga(a)redhat.com');>> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2015 Subject: [Openstack-i18n] Final plans before translations switch to Zanata To: ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ <jimidar(a)gmail.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jimidar(a)gmail.com');>> Cc: openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','openstack-i18n(a)lists.openstack.org');>, openstack-infra(a)lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','openstack-infra(a)lists.openstack.org');> On 5 September 2015 at 05:41, ਅਨਪੜ੍ਹ ਜਿਮੀਂਦਾਰ <jimidar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Please find my comments for bn and pa inline. > > Thanks > Jimidar > (Amandeep Singh) > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj(a)suse.com> wrote: > >> >> pa-IN >>> >> >> Rename to pa? > > > Punjabi (pa) has two scripts, one is Gurmukhi used in Indian side of > Punjab and the other is Shahmukhi (Urdu) used in Pakistan's Punjab, so > renaming to a generalized name wont do the justice to both entirely > different scripts. > Would "pa-Guru" work as a more general locale for Punjabi Gurmukhi? With "pa-Arab" for Punjabi Shahmukhi? -- Sean Flanigan Principal Software Engineer Globalisation Tools Engineering Red Hat

1 0

Final plans before translations switch to Zanata
by Elizabeth K. Joseph 08 Sep '15

08 Sep '15

Hi everyone, As I mentioned at the infrastructure meeting yesterday[0], we are almost ready to launch the production Zanata server (translate.openstack.org) I have a week long trip starting this Friday night so I'm sharing my plans here so clarkb, StevenK and others can continue the work while I'm gone. I'm Cc:ing the translations team on this message so they are kept in the loop. First of all, timeline-wise we're aiming to get this in the hands of the translators by the week of September 7th so they have time to do their work before the Liberty release. We have a few improvements to installation that we still need to work out: 1. Switch to archive module for server installation (change here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192901/) 2. Switch to archive module for client installation (I'll get that change proposed today) 3. Figure out why Wildfly 9.1 isn't being installed and used (instead of 8.1 that we began with), in spite of changing the download link (it's being downloaded) and upgrading the puppet-wildfly module (Steve: you've doven into the latest changes in the puppet-wildfly module, perhaps you're in a good place to look at this?) This should all be finished in the next couple days and we can then launch translate.openstack.org Beyond raw server launching, there are a few other things that we need to make sure happen: 1. Work with Carlos to get instructions for properly importing the user database to the new server (I've Cc:ed him here, we need this ASAP) 2. Work with Daisy to make sure there are cut-over instructions from Transifex to Zanata, and if there's anything we need to do (we should make a plan, even if the exact date is not clear) 3. Generally make sure everything on our script side of things is going well (StevenK has done an amazing job with these so I'm not worried) 4. Make sure we have imported everything we need. AJaeger will be traveling some too, but had the following to say: "First priority would be that the translators can translate. So, this means pushing source strings to Zanata (at least once initially) and getting them working is most important. Then the regular update after each change (which should be working fine already). Importing in the projects can wait a few days, there's no harm if that one stops for a week or two since we do not lose time this way. For translation the most important project is horizon with it's friends" I think that's it. I'll do my best to check in and reply to email and IRC pings while I'm traveling, but some things may need to wait until I'm back at my hotel in the [US east coast] evening. I'll be back the [US west coast] night of Sunday, September 6th. The 7th is a holiday in the US, but I'll be available if we have unexpected problems to work through. Thanks everyone. [0] Starting 19:19: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2015/infra.2015-08-25-19.00.l… -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2

10 19

Migrating to Zanata - Progress update
by Ying Chun Guo 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hello, team According to the update from infrastructure team, the migration will happen in this week, probably on late Tuesday PDT time. All the preparation work is done. Just need an appropriate time to kick off. Now there are 92 users registered in Zanata trial instance (i.e. translate-dev.openstack.org ). 8 language teams have coordinators. Comparing with 900+ translators and 80+ language teams in Transifex, there is still a big gap. More details about the translation teams in Zanata could be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/I18nTeam/Migration-to-zanata I'm going to use "messaging" in Transifex to inform the change to coordinators of some "important" language teams , one by one. If you have good suggestions to attract more translators from Transifex to Zanata, please let me know. Thank you. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

[nova][i18n] Is there any point in using _() in python-novaclient?
by Matt Riedemann 06 Sep '15

06 Sep '15

I noticed this today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219768/ And it got me thinking about something I've wondered before - why do we even use _() in python-novaclient? It doesn't have any .po files for babel message translation, it has no babel config, there is nothing in setup.cfg about extracting messages and compiling them into .mo's, there is nothing on Transifex for python-novaclient, etc. Is there a way to change your locale and get translated output in nova CLIs? I didn't find anything in docs from a quick google search. Comparing to python-openstackclient, that does have a babel config and some locale po files in tree, at least for de and zh_TW. So if this doesn't work in python-novaclient, do we need any of the i18n code in there? It doesn't really hurt, but it seems pointless to push changes for it or try to keep user-facing messages in mind in the code. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann

2 1

What's Up, Doc? 4 September, 2015
by Lana Brindley 04 Sep '15

04 Sep '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, This has been a fairly busy week, with Summit preparations beginning, more newly migrated RST books going live, and testing starting on the Install Guide. I've been spending time on sorting out the Liberty blueprints still outstanding, and also working on some old bugs. == Progress towards Liberty == 40 days to go! * RST conversion: ** Is now completed! Well done and a huge thank you to everyone who converted pages, approved reviews, and participated in publishing the new guides. This was a truly phenomenal effort :) * User Guides information architecture overhaul ** Some user analysis has begun, and we have a new blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/user-guides-reo rganised * Greater focus on helping out devs with docs in their repo ** A certain amount of progress has been made here, and some wrinkles sorted out which will improve this process for the future. * Improve how we communicate with and support our corporate contributors ** If you currently work on documentation for a company that would like to improve their upstream commits for documentation, please contact me! * Improve communication with Docs Liaisons ** I'm very pleased to see liaisons getting more involved in our bugs and reviews. Keep up the good work! * Clearing out old bugs ** The last lot of old bugs are still languishing. I'm assuming you all hate them so very much that I've decided to give you three more to pick from. Have at it! == Countdown to Summit == With the Liberty release less than two months away, that means it's nearly Summit time again: https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/ The schedule has now been released, congratulations to everyone who had a talk accepted this time around: https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/schedule/ All ATCs should have received their pass by now, so now is the time to be booking your travel and accommodation: https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/tokyo-and-travel/ == Conventions == A new governance patch has landed which changes the way we capitalise service names (I know almost exactly 50% of you will be happy about this!): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/Conventions#Service_and_pr oject_names Please be aware of this when editing files, and remember that the 'source of truth' for these things is the projects.yaml file: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projec ts.yaml == Docs Tools == openstack-doc-tools 0.30.0 and openstackdocstheme 1.2.1 have been released. openstack-doc-tools allows translation of the Install Guide. openstackdocstheme contains fixes for the inclusion of metatags, removes unused images and javascript files, and fixes the "Docs Home" link. == Doc team meeting == The APAC meeting was not held this week. The minutes from the previous US meeting are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/MeetingLogs#2015-08-26 The next meetings are: US: Wednesday 9 September, 14:00:00 UTC APAC: Wednesday 16 September, 00:30:00 UTC Please go ahead and add any agenda items to the meeting page here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_ meeting == Spotlight bugs for this week == Let's give these three a little love: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1280092 end user guide lacks doc on admin password injection https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1282765 Chapter 6. Block Storage in OpenStack Cloud Administrator Guide https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1284215 Driver for IBM SONAS and Storwize V7000 Unified - -- Remember, if you have content you would like to add to this newsletter, or you would like to be added to the distribution list, please email me directly at openstack(a)lanabrindley.com, or visit: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/WhatsUpDoc Keep on doc'ing! Lana - -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV6TlFAAoJELppzVb4+KUy/zkIAKYKbKdw78Nv8dpB8d9Rj4qh +JTK2rTlz/Up5F10OzIoJoNMIvySeKH+jHV1CP0qL9KigYaepkEeMn8RnNSayYww cgSmk/8gpzGTTd17JK0Rrn+RjOb3XMYeNH2d4OkvIQPGBAYsnerODrvEK3GG7YHO oo5xYSkLdYH54qnXhhvNZxjxDclT1P5QgpUP6M6KcB3bcKt4niHGLHnBHFoqvlMR gJA1BtKR6CackhZbkJpPFCpEHimm4xdWwF+q7xRezy599MbkkPAIxR/oMuEkqU2H zj+tm9sHDxOoH2j4Hfkbw7xxF+/NjvGtm41JCPsUVBxuAocaBbJ1kZRbbRzrafI= =2TAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

IRC meeting tomorrow
by Ying Chun Guo 02 Sep '15

02 Sep '15

Hello, team We will have the IRC meeting at UTC 0600 in the channel #openstack-meeting, on September 3rd. I will be there to answer any questions about Liberty translation and new translation platform. Join the meeting if you have any concerns and questions. Following topics will be covered: * Zanata status and QA * Liberty translation plan and QA * Open discussions If you have other topics, feel free to propose. Best regards Ying Chun Guo (Daisy)

1 0

Zanata migration on 9/7?
by Akihiro Motoki 01 Sep '15

01 Sep '15

Hi Daisy, I heard from other Japanese translators that we will move to Zanata on Sep 7. Is it officially decided? As far as I heard it was announced only on Transifex message [1]. After I heard that, I checked various place in Transifex but I could not find any announce. In addition, I completely disable Transifex message as almost of them are useless. Has it already been announced in this list? Don't we need to announce it in this list? I thought this list is the official place where this kind of important information is announced. Is my understanding wrong? Akihiro [1] https://www.transifex.com/openstack/teams/670/discussions/13508/

3 3