[FFE][requirements][castellan] Critical bug found in Castellan 3.0.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exception for Requirements to remove Castellan 3.0.0 and use the soon-to-be-released 3.0.1 build. The Barbican team found a critical bug in the Castellan 3.0.0 release [1] that is currently breaking our gates. The Oslo team will be making a new 3.0.1 release as soon as the bugfix patch merges. [2] Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal Barbican PTL [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bug/1872480 [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718775 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwcapj5oGTj2zd3XogB6WFOq/OrcFAl6UhEgACgkQgB6WFOq/ Orfl1g/+Ll6Zw2LB6pQeDBdx/YLYcfyYZWol14Ye45wELMArUSwxwsI/Ekwdmtgo VfMgP8tg+OxiD6/I2Wx2S+a4Cys8/SiXCO7hMwUSoGDdthI2lB8ICUgPqaiUvrbe nKH7IW0niVKQW9ISBw2w5TrAaCf4vg1e8KDBDQE91d8wng3Sv/DPZsVFEcU+bixE ayr7LKlNrCpeSzHIZE1YOqAYGyL7NtvruzPdC52yz1lE/iNbJSQQpLjXTcr/E7gl KzBTj04VclFRz/ESS1/VaLHfnHjEW0UmeM7xmr5H/mncJgLF8lQttifVjHZ+cvsp QziIp87IOIeWGh7PYUAKwqWeh+WKYLghGrzsLc6LlHy+QRx5kUqlv/6XbPkXfsDh RmaOoCB3PkP0pStmbMNwfU6k9VWsa4K13ejOrDNZQfyHfcrzRfVFojcW7c+jRHZr R3Um4DP3LyozYA1c4U2WrHv5B+xO+e64LylNCt+mLQ+hoVUacrglA2PgMtak7pwe 5gJJTTLtJUXlwyoe2+iM4wu8JgKXOY3MuMh8R+e60/8U1IeAB2Meew6ec51qaNQ4 j9KCL3nopjpA/aJH1qCRjLqf2AslXFQ9XVtO9DmJ3MchDrqyVIKGDQk354AEUYvE o2zC1FVNNjmpsiam9QpNak+1D0IwxWXZBONjLD5K5R8cDBJMVBM= =6WW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 20-04-13 10:24:57, Douglas Mendizabal wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exception for Requirements to remove Castellan 3.0.0 and use the soon-to-be-released 3.0.1 build.
The Barbican team found a critical bug in the Castellan 3.0.0 release [1] that is currently breaking our gates.
The Oslo team will be making a new 3.0.1 release as soon as the bugfix patch merges. [2]
Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal Barbican PTL
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bug/1872480 [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718775 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwcapj5oGTj2zd3XogB6WFOq/OrcFAl6UhEgACgkQgB6WFOq/ Orfl1g/+Ll6Zw2LB6pQeDBdx/YLYcfyYZWol14Ye45wELMArUSwxwsI/Ekwdmtgo VfMgP8tg+OxiD6/I2Wx2S+a4Cys8/SiXCO7hMwUSoGDdthI2lB8ICUgPqaiUvrbe nKH7IW0niVKQW9ISBw2w5TrAaCf4vg1e8KDBDQE91d8wng3Sv/DPZsVFEcU+bixE ayr7LKlNrCpeSzHIZE1YOqAYGyL7NtvruzPdC52yz1lE/iNbJSQQpLjXTcr/E7gl KzBTj04VclFRz/ESS1/VaLHfnHjEW0UmeM7xmr5H/mncJgLF8lQttifVjHZ+cvsp QziIp87IOIeWGh7PYUAKwqWeh+WKYLghGrzsLc6LlHy+QRx5kUqlv/6XbPkXfsDh RmaOoCB3PkP0pStmbMNwfU6k9VWsa4K13ejOrDNZQfyHfcrzRfVFojcW7c+jRHZr R3Um4DP3LyozYA1c4U2WrHv5B+xO+e64LylNCt+mLQ+hoVUacrglA2PgMtak7pwe 5gJJTTLtJUXlwyoe2+iM4wu8JgKXOY3MuMh8R+e60/8U1IeAB2Meew6ec51qaNQ4 j9KCL3nopjpA/aJH1qCRjLqf2AslXFQ9XVtO9DmJ3MchDrqyVIKGDQk354AEUYvE o2zC1FVNNjmpsiam9QpNak+1D0IwxWXZBONjLD5K5R8cDBJMVBM= =6WW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Given gate times, would it be better to wait for the patch to merge and make a release than to wait on requirements gate to back it out? -- Matthew Thode
On 4/13/20 11:02 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 20-04-13 10:24:57, Douglas Mendizabal wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exception for Requirements to remove Castellan 3.0.0 and use the soon-to-be-released 3.0.1 build.
The Barbican team found a critical bug in the Castellan 3.0.0 release [1] that is currently breaking our gates.
The Oslo team will be making a new 3.0.1 release as soon as the bugfix patch merges. [2]
Thanks, Douglas Mendizábal Barbican PTL
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bug/1872480 [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718775 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwcapj5oGTj2zd3XogB6WFOq/OrcFAl6UhEgACgkQgB6WFOq/ Orfl1g/+Ll6Zw2LB6pQeDBdx/YLYcfyYZWol14Ye45wELMArUSwxwsI/Ekwdmtgo VfMgP8tg+OxiD6/I2Wx2S+a4Cys8/SiXCO7hMwUSoGDdthI2lB8ICUgPqaiUvrbe nKH7IW0niVKQW9ISBw2w5TrAaCf4vg1e8KDBDQE91d8wng3Sv/DPZsVFEcU+bixE ayr7LKlNrCpeSzHIZE1YOqAYGyL7NtvruzPdC52yz1lE/iNbJSQQpLjXTcr/E7gl KzBTj04VclFRz/ESS1/VaLHfnHjEW0UmeM7xmr5H/mncJgLF8lQttifVjHZ+cvsp QziIp87IOIeWGh7PYUAKwqWeh+WKYLghGrzsLc6LlHy+QRx5kUqlv/6XbPkXfsDh RmaOoCB3PkP0pStmbMNwfU6k9VWsa4K13ejOrDNZQfyHfcrzRfVFojcW7c+jRHZr R3Um4DP3LyozYA1c4U2WrHv5B+xO+e64LylNCt+mLQ+hoVUacrglA2PgMtak7pwe 5gJJTTLtJUXlwyoe2+iM4wu8JgKXOY3MuMh8R+e60/8U1IeAB2Meew6ec51qaNQ4 j9KCL3nopjpA/aJH1qCRjLqf2AslXFQ9XVtO9DmJ3MchDrqyVIKGDQk354AEUYvE o2zC1FVNNjmpsiam9QpNak+1D0IwxWXZBONjLD5K5R8cDBJMVBM= =6WW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Given gate times, would it be better to wait for the patch to merge and make a release than to wait on requirements gate to back it out?
The fix has merged and I've proposed a release: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/719596
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 4/13/20 11:02 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: [snip]
Given gate times, would it be better to wait for the patch to merge and make a release than to wait on requirements gate to back it out?
I think having a new release with the fix asap would be great. It would certainly allow us to unblock the Barbican gates. Maybe we can add a !=3.0.0 to the requirements file after the new release is out. - - Douglas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwcapj5oGTj2zd3XogB6WFOq/OrcFAl6UlUwACgkQgB6WFOq/ OreqGhAAgfSYir7f+vpuIt0fTGYaVpc8N6juinC9lv0LtGM9m203sezlML3SlbGT s0FArrCHYQDkjzHl1YqahXFj3nFl9a9YkVLRDYzCFKNktEOVmYu8F8fJxFT0TnZB k4oXYYv40iDV8Hv7OJALfoEo5/UEu9sAfVnnTfSDiBZfTpuDPzhkewEYbODTHPCG 5t0HCS97oJP1V59yOGavxD3qu4co31kER5pAZIKQk1R7pdV1BfNQSfFC+cEEHR7t wEhMFHyykrQOCeXviHJpVyLJWHB7LhA4SCGnxXBTjufQeCQMToJu8VNt9vqnkt6Y NpPsGSf/EhAvTAFAmzfHUJRDyxKCH7e0BYSpVUnIhan2Ct2Untk5WyP65fTUsn4u 9XgrF4TtDvhMvqaAUdMvZSyp35DKa7yMv0cKBqoPfRprO3aF09GebcnyaaRyxZRG ZowYS88lD4Vbp2E2qc9SZ4CEe5S8ETMEFNV3cm+lw+o0S8qFBUxgvH8DiW5lFz9F 6ZfSeRe8qyYBFy58w1kXZOgT+8PrHABybLZkd9zc2U7A9KvuQDsT+MUE2uDV//W9 luxbnmZXHPDiYy/FS/eXoX/TFtZPZKrX8VXUr0aypOaNOg2k7FG+al8KF8cRx4MG 1F/UuPsWamDcBXRs6qa+KfJOcmbfAhctYjbNzi2r6EsRHq+zVsI= =Pc3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Ben Nemec
-
Douglas Mendizabal
-
Matthew Thode