[resource-management-sig] Status of the "Resource Management" SIG
Hi,
I was wondering about the status of the Resource Management SIG... It's been "forming" according to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG since January 2018... And I could'nt find a reference or log to any meeting after that.
Does anyone have updated status on this one? Should it be removed from the list of active SIGs at https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ ?
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I was wondering about the status of the Resource Management SIG... It's been "forming" according to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG since January 2018... And I could'nt find a reference or log to any meeting after that.
I think it is fair to say that this has failed to launch. Jay's moved on to other things, I have maybe a pinkie toe of attention left to community things, and I'm unable to speak for Howard (which says something in itself).
Does anyone have updated status on this one? Should it be removed from the list of active SIGs at https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ ?
Unless we hear from Howard pretty soon I'd say, for the sake of tidying things up and accurately reflecting reality, it would be a good idea to remove it.
Which is unfortunate. I suspect that in mixed VNF and CNF environments or multi-cloud settings where both will be accessed, having a consistent overview and nomenclature for resources would be a good thing.
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 12:23 +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I was wondering about the status of the Resource Management SIG... It's been "forming" according to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG since January 2018... And I could'nt find a reference or log to any meeting after that.
I think it is fair to say that this has failed to launch. Jay's moved on to other things, I have maybe a pinkie toe of attention left to community things, and I'm unable to speak for Howard (which says something in itself).
Does anyone have updated status on this one? Should it be removed from the list of active SIGs at https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ ?
Unless we hear from Howard pretty soon I'd say, for the sake of tidying things up and accurately reflecting reality, it would be a good idea to remove it.
Which is unfortunate. I suspect that in mixed VNF and CNF environments or multi-cloud settings where both will be accessed, having a consistent overview and nomenclature for resources would be a good thing.
well to that point i think working to integrate os-traits and placmenet with kubernetes to allow both opentack and kubernetes to run on the same plathform to support miext vnf cnf deployment would be a great future use of placement and openstack/kubernetes collabaration.
we already have touch points with kuryr/neutron, cinder, nova/ironic and keystone integration with k8s i think placment would also be a strong candidate. for example i can see maping traits to kubernetes lables and using placemnt to track pod resouce garentees(i forget the k8s name for that).
that said while im moderatly interested in this topic its not what im currently working on so i have not been following the work or lack there of of the sig and im not sure if i would be able to if it was to continue. i will proably bring this topic up on the placment channel again at some point if i have more time to spend on it.
Hi Thierry,
Intend to launch the activity during Shanghai PTG via Cyborg sessions, for those you are interested in topics like Kubernetes, OCP OAI, RISC-V you are more than welcomed to reach out to me.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:19 PM Thierry Carrez thierry@openstack.org wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering about the status of the Resource Management SIG... It's been "forming" according to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG since January 2018... And I could'nt find a reference or log to any meeting after that.
Does anyone have updated status on this one? Should it be removed from the list of active SIGs at https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/ ?
-- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
Intend to launch the activity during Shanghai PTG via Cyborg sessions, for those you are interested in topics like Kubernetes, OCP OAI, RISC-V you are more than welcomed to reach out to me.
Was that effort successful? Should we keep the resource management SIG, with status:forming and removing the other chairs?
Yes we had a great session at Shanghai and Rico is working with me to update the tag to reflect the SIG status
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:55 PM Thierry Carrez thierry@openstack.org wrote:
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
Intend to launch the activity during Shanghai PTG via Cyborg sessions, for those you are interested in topics like Kubernetes, OCP OAI, RISC-V you are more than welcomed to reach out to me.
Was that effort successful? Should we keep the resource management SIG, with status:forming and removing the other chairs?
-- Thierry
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:57 PM Thierry Carrez thierry@openstack.org wrote:
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
Intend to launch the activity during Shanghai PTG via Cyborg sessions, for those you are interested in topics like Kubernetes, OCP OAI, RISC-V you are more than welcomed to reach out to me.
Was that effort successful? Should we keep the resource management SIG, with status:forming and removing the other chairs?
Agree with Thierry, the best status for Resource Management is forming. which (I hope) will also attract other people's attention.
-- Thierry
-- May The Force of OpenStack Be With You, Rico Lin irc: ricolin
participants (5)
-
Chris Dent
-
Rico Lin
-
Sean Mooney
-
Thierry Carrez
-
Zhipeng Huang