[tc][freezer][watcher][release][requirement][oslo][ironic] projects need to refresh the DPL model for the next cycle
Hi All, As you know, we have six projects (listed below) in the DPL model. As per process[1], we need to reset the DPL model every cycle. The project team either needs to opt-in to the DPL model by -1 from all currently listed liaisons (refer to the document for exact steps[1]) or plan for the PTL election. 1. Freezer: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956918 2. Watcher: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 3. Release: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956916 4. Requirement: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956915 5. Oslo: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956912 6. Ironic: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956917 [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership... -gmaan
for watcher we ran out of time to discuss this in this week irc meeting but its on our agenda to do so for next week. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.d30930ede01bc78e0af2233cc8d41299#L30 depending on the out come of that discussion we will either continue with the DPL model or someone will send a nomination for the ptl elections before the deadline which i believe is the 20th currently we expect to continue the DPL model but i do expect some of the liaison to rotate or change. so like last year we will probably allow https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 to merge and have a followup patch with the new liaisons and reselection of the dpl mode since the listed liaisons will need to be updated. On 08/08/2025 16:32, Ghanshyam Maan wrote:
Hi All,
As you know, we have six projects (listed below) in the DPL model. As per process[1], we need to reset the DPL model every cycle. The project team either needs to opt-in to the DPL model by -1 from all currently listed liaisons (refer to the document for exact steps[1]) or plan for the PTL election.
1. Freezer: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956918 2. Watcher: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 3. Release: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956916 4. Requirement: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956915 5. Oslo: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956912 6. Ironic: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956917
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership...
-gmaan
---- On Fri, 08 Aug 2025 08:46:43 -0700 Sean Mooney <smooney@redhat.com> wrote ---
for watcher we ran out of time to discuss this in this week irc meeting but its on our agenda to do so for next week.
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.d30930ede01bc78e0af2233cc8d41299#L30
depending on the out come of that discussion we will either continue with the DPL model or someone will send a nomination for the ptl elections before the deadline which i believe is the 20th
currently we expect to continue the DPL model but i do expect some of the liaison to rotate or change.
so like last year we will probably allow https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913
to merge and have a followup patch with the new liaisons and reselection of the dpl mode since the
listed liaisons will need to be updated.
++, that sounds good and again good example of refreshing the DPL model with the latest liaisons. As you know, I am helping in watcher-tempest-plugins, feel free to add me in tact-sig liaisions (if this is the area you need help for DPL model). -gmaan
On 08/08/2025 16:32, Ghanshyam Maan wrote:
Hi All,
As you know, we have six projects (listed below) in the DPL model. As per process[1], we need to reset the DPL model every cycle. The project team either needs to opt-in to the DPL model by -1 from all currently listed liaisons (refer to the document for exact steps[1]) or plan for the PTL election.
1. Freezer: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956918 2. Watcher: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 3. Release: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956916 4. Requirement: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956915 5. Oslo: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956912 6. Ironic: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956917
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership...
-gmaan
I double checked; Ironic liaisons have all re-opted-in. We should be in good shape. Thanks! -JayF On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 9:11 AM Ghanshyam Maan <gmaan@ghanshyammann.com> wrote:
---- On Fri, 08 Aug 2025 08:46:43 -0700 Sean Mooney <smooney@redhat.com> wrote ---
for watcher we ran out of time to discuss this in this week irc meeting but its on our agenda to do so for next week.
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.d30930ede01bc78e0af2233cc8d41299#L30
depending on the out come of that discussion we will either continue with the DPL model or someone will send a nomination for the ptl elections before the deadline which i believe is the 20th
currently we expect to continue the DPL model but i do expect some of the liaison to rotate or change.
so like last year we will probably allow https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913
to merge and have a followup patch with the new liaisons and reselection of the dpl mode since the
listed liaisons will need to be updated.
++, that sounds good and again good example of refreshing the DPL model with the latest liaisons.
As you know, I am helping in watcher-tempest-plugins, feel free to add me in tact-sig liaisions (if this is the area you need help for DPL model).
-gmaan
On 08/08/2025 16:32, Ghanshyam Maan wrote:
Hi All,
As you know, we have six projects (listed below) in the DPL model. As
per process[1], we need to reset the
DPL model every cycle. The project team either needs to opt-in to the DPL model by -1 from all currently listed liaisons (refer to the document for exact steps[1]) or plan for the PTL election.
1. Freezer: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956918 2. Watcher: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956913 3. Release: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956916 4. Requirement: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956915 5. Oslo: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956912 6. Ironic: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/956917
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership...
-gmaan
participants (3)
-
Ghanshyam Maan
-
Jay Faulkner
-
Sean Mooney