Hi all, Could I interest someone in reviewing the *bifrost* - *bug* https://bugs.launchpad.net/bifrost/+bug/2103448 and its - *proposed solution* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/944810 ? Many thanks and feel free to let me know how I can help. Cheers, Dominic ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Afonne-CID <2103448@bugs.launchpad.net> Date: Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 4:30 PM Subject: [Bug 2103448] Re: Extending `hosts` to also accept new `target_hosts` variable To: <dominic.dumrauf.git@gmail.com> Thanks for the bug and also proposing a change. You can get some eyes on your proposed change by asking about it in the #openstack-bifrost channel on IRC (if you haven't already). I personally think it LGTM. On the change, instead of "Bug #2103448: ", use 'Closes-Bug: #2103448' so that it directly references this report and gets automatically tracked and closed by the bot once resolved. ** Changed in: bifrost Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: bifrost Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: bifrost Assignee: (unassigned) => Dominic Dumrauf (dumrauf) -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103448 Title: Extending `hosts` to also accept new `target_hosts` variable Status in Bifrost: Triaged Bug description: Many thanks for providing a single `install.yaml` playbook which installs `bifrost` in one go. Great work! It seems the hosts are fixed to target in the playbook. Would it be possible to make the playbook work with other inventories by introducing a new variable `target_hosts` as in PR https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/944810 ? The proposed change should be backwards compatible. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bifrost/+bug/2103448/+subscriptions