RE: [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
Hello, You need an active subscription RHOSP for doing that , but Kolla was not supported by Redhat unfortunely ... Stéphane Chalansonnet -----Message d'origine----- De : openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org> Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 22:04 À : openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Objet : openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56 Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner@lists.openstack.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed (Jeremy Stanley) 2. Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for Zun containers? (Jason Anderson) 3. [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (Ildiko Vancsa) 4. Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (John Fulton) 5. [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:50:37 +0000 From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed Message-ID: <20210408165036.6tkcfwwix5ms3ig4@yuggoth.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On 2021-04-08 11:54:16 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote: [...]
I proposed a patch to move to nodejs10 all our projects that depend on nodejs:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/785353
When this patch will be merged I think that this job could be reenqueued.
I reenqueued the tag, but release-openstack-javascript failed on a different problem. NPM complains that there's already a eslint-config-openstack 4.0.1 published which can't be overwritten, but the tag is for 4.1.0... someone should probably update the version parameter in eslint-config-openstack's package.json file, which means it'll need another release tagged anyway (4.1.1?). -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210408/961aecf4/attachment-0001.sig> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:00:19 +0000 From: Jason Anderson <jasonanderson@uchicago.edu> To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for Zun containers? Message-ID: <0A70CB1A-35AA-4782-8BF3-496080E47341@uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" As usual, “rubber ducking” the openstack-discuss list yielded fruit. It turns out that I didn’t have the l2population mechanism driver enabled. I thought this was optional for some reason. It looks like enabling this and restarting the neutorn-openvswitch-agent has fixed connectivity! /Jason
On Apr 8, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Jason Anderson <jasonanderson@uchicago.edu> wrote:
Hello stackers,
I’m interested in using zun to launch containers and assign floating IPs via neutron to those containers. I am deploying zun, kuryr-libnetwork, and neutron with kolla-ansible on the Train release. I’ve configured neutron with one physical network and I’d like to use a VXLAN overlay for tenant networks.
What works: - I can launch containers on a neutron tenant network, they start successfully, they get an IP and can reach each other if they’re co-located on a single host. - I can create all my neutron networks, routers, subnets, without (obvious) errors. - I can update security groups on the container and see the iptables rules updated appropriately. - I can directly create Docker networks using the kuryr driver/type.
What doesn’t work: - I can’t see any vxlan ports on the br-tun OVS bridge - I can’t access the exposed container ports from the control/network node via the router netns - Because of that, I can’t assign floating IPs because NAT effectively won’t work to reach the containers
The fact that there are no ports on br-tun is supicious, but I’m not sure how this is supposed to work. I don’t see anything weird in neutron-openvswitch-agent logs but those logs are quite noisy and I’m not sure what to look for.
Has anybody deployed such a setup / are there limitations I should know about?
Thank you!
Jason Anderson
DevOps Lead, Chameleon
---
Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory jasonanderson@uchicago.edu
------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:18:54 +0200 From: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG Message-ID: <0A7B1EBD-0715-43ED-B388-A2011D437DD0@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi, I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks. We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors. We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most people who are interested in participating can join. Our available options are: * Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC __Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__ Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC ildikov on Freenode) ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:39:45 -0400 From: John Fulton <johfulto@redhat.com> To: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> Cc: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG Message-ID: <CAE66OMCQWZFB+7SM1amzRr1Vq3pOm=fEgtQTuHLh0=0PPXy-sQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors.
We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most people who are interested in participating can join. Our available options are:
* Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
I'm not available Monday but could join Tuesday. I'd be curious to hear what others are doing with Storage on the Edge and could share some info on how TripleO does it. John
__Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210408/ac34d099/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:04:04 +0000 From: Tony Liu <tonyliu0592@hotmail.com> To: "openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [kolla] RHEL based container image Message-ID: <MWHPR08MB2382486467C9EE24247052B9BD749@MWHPR08MB2382.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Given [1], RHEL based container is supported on RHEL 8 by Kolla. Where can I get RHEL based container images? I see CentOS and Ubuntu based images on docker hub, but can't find RHEL based images. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/ussuri/user/support-matrix.html Thanks! Tony ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ openstack-discuss mailing list openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss ------------------------------ End of openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56 *************************************************
I have RHEL subscription and I want to know if it's possible to use Kolla deploy OpenStack. It's supposed to be yes based on the doc. I just want to know where I can get container images. The container image on RedHat is only for TripleO. Thanks! Tony
-----Original Message----- From: CHALANSONNET Stéphane (Acoss) <stephane.chalansonnet@acoss.fr> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:29 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
Hello,
You need an active subscription RHOSP for doing that , but Kolla was not supported by Redhat unfortunely ...
Stéphane Chalansonnet
-----Message d'origine----- De : openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss- request@lists.openstack.org> Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 22:04 À : openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Objet : openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56
Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack- discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org
You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner@lists.openstack.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed (Jeremy Stanley) 2. Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for Zun containers? (Jason Anderson) 3. [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (Ildiko Vancsa) 4. Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (John Fulton) 5. [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:50:37 +0000 From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed Message-ID: <20210408165036.6tkcfwwix5ms3ig4@yuggoth.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 2021-04-08 11:54:16 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote: [...]
I proposed a patch to move to nodejs10 all our projects that depend on nodejs:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/785353
When this patch will be merged I think that this job could be reenqueued.
I reenqueued the tag, but release-openstack-javascript failed on a different problem. NPM complains that there's already a eslint-config- openstack 4.0.1 published which can't be overwritten, but the tag is for 4.1.0... someone should probably update the version parameter in eslint- config-openstack's package.json file, which means it'll need another release tagged anyway (4.1.1?). -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack- discuss/attachments/20210408/961aecf4/attachment-0001.sig>
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:00:19 +0000 From: Jason Anderson <jasonanderson@uchicago.edu> To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for Zun containers? Message-ID: <0A70CB1A-35AA-4782-8BF3-496080E47341@uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
As usual, “rubber ducking” the openstack-discuss list yielded fruit. It turns out that I didn’t have the l2population mechanism driver enabled. I thought this was optional for some reason. It looks like enabling this and restarting the neutorn-openvswitch-agent has fixed connectivity!
/Jason
On Apr 8, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Jason Anderson <jasonanderson@uchicago.edu> wrote:
Hello stackers,
I’m interested in using zun to launch containers and assign floating IPs via neutron to those containers. I am deploying zun, kuryr- libnetwork, and neutron with kolla-ansible on the Train release. I’ve configured neutron with one physical network and I’d like to use a VXLAN overlay for tenant networks.
What works: - I can launch containers on a neutron tenant network, they start successfully, they get an IP and can reach each other if they’re co- located on a single host. - I can create all my neutron networks, routers, subnets, without (obvious) errors. - I can update security groups on the container and see the iptables rules updated appropriately. - I can directly create Docker networks using the kuryr driver/type.
What doesn’t work: - I can’t see any vxlan ports on the br-tun OVS bridge - I can’t access the exposed container ports from the control/network node via the router netns - Because of that, I can’t assign floating IPs because NAT effectively won’t work to reach the containers
The fact that there are no ports on br-tun is supicious, but I’m not sure how this is supposed to work. I don’t see anything weird in neutron-openvswitch-agent logs but those logs are quite noisy and I’m not sure what to look for.
Has anybody deployed such a setup / are there limitations I should know about?
Thank you!
Jason Anderson
DevOps Lead, Chameleon
---
Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago Mathematics and Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory jasonanderson@uchicago.edu
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:18:54 +0200 From: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG Message-ID: <0A7B1EBD-0715-43ED-B388-A2011D437DD0@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors.
We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most people who are interested in participating can join. Our available options are:
* Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
__Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:39:45 -0400 From: John Fulton <johfulto@redhat.com> To: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> Cc: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG Message-ID: <CAE66OMCQWZFB+7SM1amzRr1Vq3pOm=fEgtQTuHLh0=0PPXy-sQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors.
We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most people who are interested in participating can join. Our available options are:
* Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
I'm not available Monday but could join Tuesday. I'd be curious to hear what others are doing with Storage on the Edge and could share some info on how TripleO does it.
John
__Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack- discuss/attachments/20210408/ac34d099/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:04:04 +0000 From: Tony Liu <tonyliu0592@hotmail.com> To: "openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [kolla] RHEL based container image Message-ID: <MWHPR08MB2382486467C9EE24247052B9BD749@MWHPR08MB2382.namprd08.prod .outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
Given [1], RHEL based container is supported on RHEL 8 by Kolla. Where can I get RHEL based container images? I see CentOS and Ubuntu based images on docker hub, but can't find RHEL based images.
[1] https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/ussuri/user/support- matrix.html
Thanks! Tony
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________ openstack-discuss mailing list openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
------------------------------
End of openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56 *************************************************
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 02:04, Tony Liu <tonyliu0592@hotmail.com> wrote:
I have RHEL subscription and I want to know if it's possible to use Kolla deploy OpenStack. It's supposed to be yes based on the doc. I just want to know where I can get container images. The container image on RedHat is only for TripleO.
Hi Tony, RHEL support is one of those things that was added a long time ago, but is not tested in CI. It is therefore likely to break at any point, especially now that Tripleo does not use Kolla images. I know that RH were pushing the UBI images, and I don't think we've actively done anything to move to those. We've added the future of RHEL support as a discussion topic for the PTG [1]. If you are interested, I recommend that you attend, or at least add some notes to the Etherpad. Thanks, Mark [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-xena-ptg
Thanks! Tony
-----Original Message----- From: CHALANSONNET Stéphane (Acoss) <stephane.chalansonnet@acoss.fr> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:29 PM To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: RE: [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
Hello,
You need an active subscription RHOSP for doing that , but Kolla was not supported by Redhat unfortunely ...
Stéphane Chalansonnet
-----Message d'origine----- De : openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss- request@lists.openstack.org> Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 22:04 À : openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Objet : openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56
Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack- discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openstack-discuss-request@lists.openstack.org
You can reach the person managing the list at openstack-discuss-owner@lists.openstack.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed (Jeremy Stanley) 2. Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for Zun containers? (Jason Anderson) 3. [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (Ildiko Vancsa) 4. Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge discussions at the PTG (John Fulton) 5. [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:50:37 +0000 From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> To: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed Message-ID: <20210408165036.6tkcfwwix5ms3ig4@yuggoth.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 2021-04-08 11:54:16 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote: [...]
I proposed a patch to move to nodejs10 all our projects that depend on nodejs:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/785353
When this patch will be merged I think that this job could be reenqueued.
I reenqueued the tag, but release-openstack-javascript failed on a different problem. NPM complains that there's already a eslint-config- openstack 4.0.1 published which can't be overwritten, but the tag is for 4.1.0... someone should probably update the version parameter in eslint- config-openstack's package.json file, which means it'll need another release tagged anyway (4.1.1?). -- Jeremy Stanley
participants (3)
-
CHALANSONNET Stéphane (Acoss)
-
Mark Goddard
-
Tony Liu