Re: [all][stable][ptl] Propose to EOL Rocky series
Hi, I understand the gate is broken, however, Rocky is in Debian LTS, and I would like to keep the possibility to merge patches, even with the gate tests disabled. CVE-2022-47951 is an example why this is important... Thomas Goirand (zigo) On Jan 28, 2023 11:54, Radosław Piliszek <radoslaw.piliszek@gmail.com> wrote:
Masakari is happy to EOL Rocky too.
Radek -yoctozepto
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:59, Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:
Thanks for doing all this cleanup work Elod. Ironic is OK with retirements of these shared resources up to Train.
- Jay Faulkner
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
participants (1)
-
Thomas Goirand