[all][stable][ptl] Propose to EOL Rocky series
Hi, Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life: - gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail. Thanks, Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release [1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Thanks for doing all this cleanup work Elod. Ironic is OK with retirements of these shared resources up to Train. - Jay Faulkner On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Masakari is happy to EOL Rocky too. Radek -yoctozepto On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:59, Jay Faulkner <jay@gr-oss.io> wrote:
Thanks for doing all this cleanup work Elod. Ironic is OK with retirements of these shared resources up to Train.
- Jay Faulkner
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:12 AM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Hi Elod, The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]). We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and stein branches to EOL. [1] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43... [2] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef0585... [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba... [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a14... Thanks Rajat Dhasmana On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Hi, Updating cinder status here. We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM. So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL. [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-m... Thanks Rajat Dhasmana On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Elod,
The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43... [2] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef0585... [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba... [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a14...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Sorry, these 2 statements sound quite contradictory to me, as keeping branch in EM and EOLing them are 2 different things. According to the meeting logs I assume you wanted to say that there were no objections to EOL branches / no reasons provided to keep them in EM? чт, 2 февр. 2023 г., 19:01 Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com>:
Hi,
Updating cinder status here. We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM. So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-m...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Elod,
The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43... [2] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef0585... [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba... [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a14...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:24 PM Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, these 2 statements sound quite contradictory to me, as keeping branch in EM and EOLing them are 2 different things.
According to the meeting logs I assume you wanted to say that there were no objections to EOL branches / no reasons provided to keep them in EM?
Yes, correct. Sorry for phrasing it in a wrong/confusing way. Cinder team doesn't want to keep rocky and stein branches in EM anymore and is ready to EOL them. Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
чт, 2 февр. 2023 г., 19:01 Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com>:
Hi,
Updating cinder status here. We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM. So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-m...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Elod,
The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43... [2] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef0585... [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba... [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a14...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
Hi Előd, Horizon team discussed this topic in the horizon weekly meeting [1] and we are fine with moving the rocky branch to EOL. Thanks & regards, Vishal Manchanda [1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-horizon/%23openstack-horiz... On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:32 PM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:24 PM Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, these 2 statements sound quite contradictory to me, as keeping branch in EM and EOLing them are 2 different things.
According to the meeting logs I assume you wanted to say that there were no objections to EOL branches / no reasons provided to keep them in EM?
Yes, correct. Sorry for phrasing it in a wrong/confusing way. Cinder team doesn't want to keep rocky and stein branches in EM anymore and is ready to EOL them.
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
чт, 2 февр. 2023 г., 19:01 Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com>:
Hi,
Updating cinder status here. We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM. So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-m...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Elod,
The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and stein branches to EOL.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43... [2] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef0585... [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153 [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520 [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba... [6] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a14...
Thanks Rajat Dhasmana
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes@est.tech> wrote:
Hi,
Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
- gates are mostly broken - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL recently (like ironic, neutron, nova) - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public maintenance window date and hard to maintain
Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to this mail.
Thanks,
Előd Illés irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030....
participants (6)
-
Dmitriy Rabotyagov
-
Elõd Illés
-
Jay Faulkner
-
Radosław Piliszek
-
Rajat Dhasmana
-
vishal manchanda