OpenStack support for msgpack 1.0.0
Hi,
msgpack 1.0.0 was released last Sept. I'm being pressed by the rest of Debian people to upload 1.0.0 to Sid. I'm concern by it: will this break any of the OpenStack package, like oslo.messaging? Is there any plan to have support for 1.0.0 for Ussuri?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On 20-03-14 22:52:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
msgpack 1.0.0 was released last Sept. I'm being pressed by the rest of Debian people to upload 1.0.0 to Sid. I'm concern by it: will this break any of the OpenStack package, like oslo.messaging? Is there any plan to have support for 1.0.0 for Ussuri?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Openstack depends on salt Salt capped msgpack to not allow 1.0.0 https://github.com/saltstack/salt/pull/56009 Openstack can't use msgpack-1.0.0 this makes me sad iirc openstack tests passed with it, I just made a review to test https://review.opendev.org/713113
When I mentioned this to upstream salt people they said it'd be in a future release, I'd project after the openstack release (it's not part of 3000.1 which is being preparred now).
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jeremy Stanley fungi@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2020-03-14 17:23:45 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote: [...]
Openstack depends on salt
[...]
Out of curiosity, what in OpenStack depends on Salt these days? It's not just a holdover from back when we had an official deployment team for that, is it?
+1
I'm also curious why we're depending on it :>
-- Jeremy Stanley
On 20-03-14 22:31:19, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2020-03-14 17:23:45 -0500 (-0500), Matthew Thode wrote: [...]
Openstack depends on salt
[...]
Out of curiosity, what in OpenStack depends on Salt these days? It's not just a holdover from back when we had an official deployment team for that, is it? -- Jeremy Stanley
It's heat-agents, if we could get rid of the dep that'd be awesome, but based on the discussion when it was added they said they didn't want to shell out, not sure what's up with how they use ansible and the rest.
It's only used for tests though, so maybe it's not as needed now?
| openstack/heat-agents | test-requirements.txt | 11 | salt>=2017.7.4 # Apache-2.0 |
On 3/14/20 5:23 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 20-03-14 22:52:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
msgpack 1.0.0 was released last Sept. I'm being pressed by the rest of Debian people to upload 1.0.0 to Sid. I'm concern by it: will this break any of the OpenStack package, like oslo.messaging? Is there any plan to have support for 1.0.0 for Ussuri?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Openstack depends on salt Salt capped msgpack to not allow 1.0.0 https://github.com/saltstack/salt/pull/56009 Openstack can't use msgpack-1.0.0 this makes me sad iirc openstack tests passed with it, I just made a review to test https://review.opendev.org/713113
When I mentioned this to upstream salt people they said it'd be in a future release, I'd project after the openstack release (it's not part of 3000.1 which is being preparred now).
For convenience, here's the search for projects that explicitly depend on msgpack and might also be affected by this: http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=msgpack&i=nope&files=requirements...
For Oslo, it looks like the only changes we need should be in oslo.privsep[0]. oslo.serialization already got updated for it, and tooz has been running tests without upper-constraints all along so we've been using it there since it released. :-/
participants (5)
-
Ben Nemec
-
Jeremy Stanley
-
Matthew Thode
-
Mohammed Naser
-
Thomas Goirand