[ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings folks, During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments. As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads. Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time. I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday. Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction? Thoughts? -Julia
Definitely interested and flexible with scheduling. Bi-weekly might be preferred due to other obligations. -- James Denton Principal Architect Rackspace Private Cloud - OpenStack james.denton@rackspace.com From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 at 9:56 AM To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? CAUTION: This message originated externally, please use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments! Greetings folks, During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments. As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads. Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time. I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday. Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction? Thoughts? -Julia
Hi, Definitely interested to join, Wednesday 1500 UTC onward in a bi-weekly fashion would be preferred by me. What would be the format of the meeting IRC, meetpad, zoom or some other ? Br, Adam ________________________________ From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 2:55 PM To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Greetings folks, During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments. As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads. Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time. I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday. Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction? Thoughts? -Julia
Hi! Definitely interested. Tuesdays work better for me, Wed 1600 UTC is also possible. I don't think we have enough to discuss for a weekly meeting, I think biweekly is a good start. Dmitry On 10/29/24 3:55 PM, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Interested to join - proposed slots are Europe friendly, from my perspective it would be important that it doesn’t collide with Kolla meeting weekly slot, which is now 14:00 UTC on Wed. Michał Nasiadka mnasiadka@gmail.com W dniu wt., 29 paź 2024 o 15:56 Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> napisał(a):
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
I’m interested as well. Bi-weekly sounds good. Either Tuesday or Wednesday. Only conflict would be the TC on Tuesday at 1800 UTC. -- Doug
On Oct 29, 2024, at 9:56 AM, Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Hi, I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree. -- Harald On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Greetings everyone! It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started. Thanks! -Julia On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Greetings everyone! Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic. I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion. The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking -Julia On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Hi Julia, Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well. We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> Karl Kloppenborg Chief Technology Officer m: +61 437 239 565 resetdata.com<https://resetdata.com/> [cid:reset_69557fc2-1d63-4932-b5fd-93bd4f39ca7b.png] ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf<https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf> This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to contact@resetdata.com.au<mailto:contact@resetdata.com.au> ________________________________ From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Greetings everyone! Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic. I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion. The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking -Julia On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Greetings! Unfortunately 9 AM UTC would be 1 AM for me. What if we held two meetings with the same agenda and tried to facilitate some overlap between the two. Perhaps like 12:00 AM UTC which would be 4 PM for me 11 AM in Sydney? Thoughts? -Julia On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:37 AM Karl Kloppenborg < kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> wrote:
Hi Julia,
Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well.
We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Karl Kloppenborg
Chief Technology Officer
m: *+61 437 239 565* *resetdata.com <https://resetdata.com/>*
[image: reset.png]
*ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting*For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; *https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... <https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf>*
This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to *contact@resetdata.com.au <contact@resetdata.com.au>* ------------------------------ *From:* Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM *To:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings everyone!
Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic.
I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion.
The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking
-Julia
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the
current
state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different
wrote: threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That
being
said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Happy to coordinate something. Maybe the overlap would work. I think this is a very important topic to discuss and it’s also something we’re actively solving for as well. Thanks, Karl. Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:58:11 AM To: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> Cc: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Greetings! Unfortunately 9 AM UTC would be 1 AM for me. What if we held two meetings with the same agenda and tried to facilitate some overlap between the two. Perhaps like 12:00 AM UTC which would be 4 PM for me 11 AM in Sydney? Thoughts? -Julia On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:37 AM Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au<mailto:kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au>> wrote: Hi Julia, Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well. We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> Karl Kloppenborg Chief Technology Officer m: +61 437 239 565 resetdata.com<https://resetdata.com/> [cid:ii_1934069c67366256c4c1] ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to contact@resetdata.com.au<mailto:contact@resetdata.com.au> ________________________________ From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com<mailto:juliaashleykreger@gmail.com>> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Greetings everyone! Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic. I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion. The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking -Julia On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com<mailto:juliaashleykreger@gmail.com>> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com<mailto:hjensas@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
I would like to attend and be involved. I’m glad to see this is happening. I have at least one use case and possibly more. I can attend at either proposed time (1500 or 0000 UTC). -- Dan Sneddon On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:59 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings!
Unfortunately 9 AM UTC would be 1 AM for me.
What if we held two meetings with the same agenda and tried to facilitate some overlap between the two.
Perhaps like 12:00 AM UTC which would be 4 PM for me 11 AM in Sydney?
Thoughts?
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:37 AM Karl Kloppenborg < kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> wrote:
Hi Julia,
Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well.
We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Karl Kloppenborg
Chief Technology Officer
m: *+61 437 239 565* *resetdata.com <https://resetdata.com/>*
[image: reset.png]
*ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting*For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; *https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... <https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf>*
This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to *contact@resetdata.com.au <contact@resetdata.com.au>* ------------------------------ *From:* Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM *To:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings everyone!
Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic.
I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion.
The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking
-Julia
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the
current
state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare
*and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different
wrote: metal threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That
being
said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
I'd like to participate too if there is an alternate friendly time (I'm in New Zealand, UTC+12). Something like 9-10 UTC Wednesday or Thursday works for me On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:47 AM Karl Kloppenborg < kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> wrote:
Hi Julia,
Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well.
We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Karl Kloppenborg
Chief Technology Officer
m: *+61 437 239 565* *resetdata.com <https://resetdata.com/>*
[image: reset.png]
*ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting*For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; *https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... <https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf>*
This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to *contact@resetdata.com.au <contact@resetdata.com.au>* ------------------------------ *From:* Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM *To:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings everyone!
Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic.
I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion.
The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking
-Julia
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the
current
state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different
wrote: threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That
being
said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
Hey Steve, Would 0000 UTC work for you? What about 2300 UTC? That would be 11 AM for you, and 10 AM for Karl, and 3 PM for myself. As a facilitator of the meeting, it would be nice for me to be able to do 1500 UTC and then something like 2300 UTC as well on the same day to line things up as close as possible. I guess as long as as there are many notes, it might be okay, someone would just need to facilitate the meeting if we do 9-10 UTC. -Julia On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Steve Baker <sbaker@redhat.com> wrote:
I'd like to participate too if there is an alternate friendly time (I'm in New Zealand, UTC+12). Something like 9-10 UTC Wednesday or Thursday works for me
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:47 AM Karl Kloppenborg < kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> wrote:
Hi Julia,
Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well.
We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Karl Kloppenborg
Chief Technology Officer
m: *+61 437 239 565* *resetdata.com <https://resetdata.com/>*
[image: reset.png]
*ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting*For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; *https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... <https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf>*
This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to *contact@resetdata.com.au <contact@resetdata.com.au>* ------------------------------ *From:* Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM *To:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings everyone!
Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic.
I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion.
The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking
-Julia
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the
current
state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare
*and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different
wrote: metal threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That
being
said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
I think this could work well. From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, 20 November 2024 at 10:02 am To: Steve Baker <sbaker@redhat.com> Cc: Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au>, openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Hey Steve, Would 0000 UTC work for you? What about 2300 UTC? That would be 11 AM for you, and 10 AM for Karl, and 3 PM for myself. As a facilitator of the meeting, it would be nice for me to be able to do 1500 UTC and then something like 2300 UTC as well on the same day to line things up as close as possible. I guess as long as as there are many notes, it might be okay, someone would just need to facilitate the meeting if we do 9-10 UTC. -Julia On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Steve Baker <sbaker@redhat.com<mailto:sbaker@redhat.com>> wrote: I'd like to participate too if there is an alternate friendly time (I'm in New Zealand, UTC+12). Something like 9-10 UTC Wednesday or Thursday works for me On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:47 AM Karl Kloppenborg <kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au<mailto:kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au>> wrote: Hi Julia, Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well. We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> Karl Kloppenborg Chief Technology Officer m: +61 437 239 565 resetdata.com<https://resetdata.com/> [cid:ii_19346647e4066256c4c1] ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to contact@resetdata.com.au<mailto:contact@resetdata.com.au> ________________________________ From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com<mailto:juliaashleykreger@gmail.com>> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group? Greetings everyone! Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic. I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion. The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking -Julia On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com<mailto:juliaashleykreger@gmail.com>> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com<mailto:hjensas@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the current state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare metal *and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
0000UTC and 2300UTC are both good for me On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:00 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Steve,
Would 0000 UTC work for you? What about 2300 UTC? That would be 11 AM for you, and 10 AM for Karl, and 3 PM for myself.
As a facilitator of the meeting, it would be nice for me to be able to do 1500 UTC and then something like 2300 UTC as well on the same day to line things up as close as possible. I guess as long as as there are many notes, it might be okay, someone would just need to facilitate the meeting if we do 9-10 UTC.
-Julia
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Steve Baker <sbaker@redhat.com> wrote:
I'd like to participate too if there is an alternate friendly time (I'm in New Zealand, UTC+12). Something like 9-10 UTC Wednesday or Thursday works for me
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:47 AM Karl Kloppenborg < kkloppenborg@resetdata.com.au> wrote:
Hi Julia,
Thanks for setting this up, our teams at ResetData would be interested in getting involved in this as well.
We're unfortunately located down under, Is there anyway we could make this more like like 9-10 UTC? As 15UTC is 2am our time
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
Karl Kloppenborg
Chief Technology Officer
m: *+61 437 239 565* *resetdata.com <https://resetdata.com/>*
[image: reset.png]
*ResetData supports Mandatory Client Related Financial Disclosures – Scope 3 Emissions Reporting*For more information on the phasing of these requirements for business please visit; *https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-stat... <https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/c2024-466491-policy-state.pdf>*
This email transmission is intended only for the addressee / person responsible for delivery of the message to such person and may contain confidential or privileged information. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you, nor may you use, review, disclose, disseminate or copy any information contained in or attached to it. Whilst this email has been checked for viruses, the sender does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error please delete it and any attachments and kindly notify us by immediately sending an email to *contact@resetdata.com.au <contact@resetdata.com.au>* ------------------------------ *From:* Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:31:05 AM *To:* openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [ironic][networking] Interest in starting a baremetal networking working group?
Greetings everyone!
Sorry for the delay in getting back on this topic.
I think for the first meeting, let's treat this as a high bandwidth call. As such I've created a zoom link, and put together an agenda to help focus the discussion.
The agenda and zoom link can be found on the etherpad:
https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/ironic-networking
-Julia
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 7:44 AM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings everyone!
It seems like bi-weekly is the consensus. Does 1500 UTC starting next Wednesday work for everyone? Seems like it does. If we need to adjust we can figure that out once we get started.
Thanks!
-Julia
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 12:59 AM Harald Jensås <hjensas@redhat.com>
Hi,
I am interested, bi-weekly seems to be the consensus already and I agree.
-- Harald
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 07:55 -0700, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings folks,
During the PTG this past week, the Ironic community including developers and operators reached a conclusion that we need to start back up a networking focused working group to try and move the
current
state of capabilities forward when bare metal machines are involved. Specifically, management of physical switch connections to bare
wrote: metal
*and* programming DPU/IPU devices for networking attachments.
As we're all quite aware, it is a complex topic with many different threads.
Given resurgent interest and a mutual desire to find some better solutions, it just makes sense to have regular discussions. That being said we need to identify an ideal day of week, frequency, and preferred time.
I'd recommend sometime between 1500 UTC and 1800 UTC. Preferably a Tuesday or Wednesday.
Would every two weeks work? Or would folks prefer to meet weekly to try and build the most possible velocity through regular interaction?
Thoughts?
-Julia
participants (10)
-
Dan Sneddon
-
Dmitry Tantsur
-
Doug Goldstein
-
Harald Jensås
-
James Denton
-
Julia Kreger
-
Karl Kloppenborg
-
Michał Nasiadka
-
Steve Baker
-
Ádám Rozmán