Re: [octavia] What is our next plan about 'l3-active-active' blueprint?
I have no new specs, I plan to follow the original blueprint. https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/contributor/specs/version1.1/activ... Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893@gmail.com> 于2019年1月5日周六 下午12:16写道:
I have no new specs, I plan to follow the original blueprint.
https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/contributor/specs/version1.1/activ...
Sa Pham <saphi070@gmail.com> 于2019年1月5日周六 上午11:58写道:
Hi Jeff,
Do you have design and specs for that.
Best,
Sa Pham Dang Cloud RnD Team - VCCLOUD Phone: 0986849582 Skype: great_bn
On Jan 5, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I want to reboot this work recently. And, I want to replace exabgp with os-ken, So I may need to rewrite some patches.
Michael Johnson <johnsomor@gmail.com> 于2019年1月5日周六 上午8:02写道:
Hi Jeff,
Unfortunately the team that was working on that code had stopped due to internal reasons.
I hope to make the reference active/active blueprint a priority again during the Train cycle. Following that I may be able to look at the L3 distributor option, but I cannot commit to that at this time.
If you are interesting in picking up that work, please let me know and we can sync up on that status of the WIP patches, etc.
Michael
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:19 PM Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Octavia team: The email aims to ask the development progress about
l3-active-active blueprint. I
noticed that the work in this area has been stagnant for eight months. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/l3-active-active I want to know the community's next work plan in this regard. Thanks.
participants (1)
-
Jeff Yang